15:10:27 #startmeeting Server Working Group Weekly Meeting (2014-07-08) 15:10:27 Meeting started Tue Jul 8 15:10:27 2014 UTC. The chair is mitr. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 15:10:27 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #halp #info #idea #link #topic. 15:10:32 #chair sgallagh mizmo nirik davidstrauss stefw adamw simo tuanta mitr 15:10:32 Current chairs: adamw davidstrauss mitr mizmo nirik sgallagh simo stefw tuanta 15:10:38 #topic roll call 15:10:41 Hello 15:10:54 .hellomynameis tuanta 15:10:56 tuanta: tuanta 'Truong Anh Tuan' 15:10:57 * nirik is here, but as usual trying to get stuff started for the day. 15:12:27 With adamw and davidstrauss that would seem to be a quorum? 15:12:45 #topic Release Media Status and Tasks 15:13:21 For my part, fedora-install-server.ks, still fighting the tools 15:13:32 .hellomynameis adamwill 15:13:33 adamw: adamwill 'Adam Williamson' 15:13:52 systemd replacing /etc/resolv.conf with a symlink has broken things left and right (lorax, anaconda post-install, and post-install system) 15:14:31 * danofsatx-work is listening 15:14:32 Except for that (i.e. except that anaconda crashes), the kickstart does produce a “working” netinstall image, but that’s really low bar 15:14:51 hey, it's pre alpha. 15:15:00 :) and thanks for working on it mitr 15:15:00 The DVD image doesn’t even boot at this point, I”m looking at that right now. 15:15:25 Then, the kickstart can still do with more cleanups (carries all of kde-l10n at this point). 15:16:07 AFAIK, we also don't have comps covered (e.g. even though cockpit will be on the DVD it won’t be installed by default) 15:16:24 And I don’t know about the fedora-release-$product packages, haven’t been following that conversation in sufficient detail. 15:16:27 * stefw apologizes for tardiness 15:16:28 (EOF) 15:17:00 nirik: Do you want the work in progress committed now, or after it is in a better shape? 15:17:08 I think dgilmore and sgallagh were taalking about the release stuff... but I didn't follow it closely either 15:17:09 early and often 15:17:15 yeah, go ahead I'd say. 15:17:37 OK, pushed. 15:19:21 nothing will use it until we point something to use it anyhow. 15:21:17 .hellomynameis davidstrauss 15:21:18 davidstrauss: davidstrauss 'David Strauss' 15:21:31 so in case anyone missed it on the list, i did a bunch of work on release validation yesterday 15:21:43 see https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/server/2014-July/001361.html 15:21:53 it could certainly benefit from other people taking a look at it 15:23:47 The top-level draft criteria they seemed fine to me (though based only on a very cursory read) 15:24:01 it would be nice if people could maybe, you know, look at it a bit more than "cursory" 15:24:08 since it'll be what decides if we release the product or not...:P 15:24:28 those paying close attention may note i fudged the server role issue for alpha; as written it doesn't actually require any server role functionality at all 15:24:57 it does encode the firewall configuration and cockpit requirements, though. 15:25:20 cool. Thanks for all that work adamw 15:25:29 which kind of implicitly requires whatever comps stuff is necessary to give us a forked core install 15:25:52 and, of course, requires that the product sort of, you know, exist. :P 15:27:58 yeah. 15:29:10 So can we collect a list of required/missing deliverables? 15:29:24 1.Finished kickstart 15:29:38 2. Comps updated to include Server packages, some by default 15:30:02 3. rolekit and plugins (not blocking image creation) 15:30:30 the stuff for the 2 roles would be in comps? 15:30:55 4. fedora-release-server (or whatever it ends up being) 15:31:07 (incl. systemd presets and other things where the configuration differs from other products) 15:31:56 nirik: ATM comps has two relevant "environments", web-server and infrastructure-server. Might make sense to merge them? I don’t know; and the roles should definitely be seletable in there as groups. 15:32:26 * nirik nods. 15:32:46 I guess I'd leave those other ones alone for now... and make new ones for the 2 roles. 15:33:17 This is blocked by rolekit anyway, at least for today/this week I guess 15:34:36 yeah 15:38:12 So… I'm working on 1; sgallagh promised to take a look at 2; twoerner is hacking on 3; do we have anyone owning 4? 15:39:11 beta and final release validation work still needs to be done, btw, i suppose i'll wind up doing that too. 15:39:17 I think dgilmore/releng wanted to own those 15:40:38 adamw: I think I could help with some of the testing if it doesn’t require too much specialized tool knowledge 15:40:53 #info Outstanding tasks 15:41:02 #info Finish kickstart: mitr 15:41:20 mitr: it's the test process design that i'm getting very little help with :/ testing itself i think (or at least i hope) more people will help out on... 15:41:40 #info Comps updated to include Server packages, selectable roles: sgallagh? 15:41:55 #info rolekit and plugins: twoerner and others 15:42:06 * sgallagh is here now. 15:42:07 some of the testing design we may only see needs adjustment when we start using it. 15:42:10 #info fedora-release-server: dgilmore/releng 15:42:16 (but of course it would be nice not to change things in the middle) 15:42:18 Sorry, appointment ran very long 15:42:42 nirik: yeah, that usually happens. 15:44:13 sgallagh: http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2014-07-08/fedora-meeting-1.2014-07-08-15.10.log.txt 15:44:58 mitr: Thank you 15:47:01 #action sgallagh to sort out comps changes 15:48:02 mitr: I think we want to be working with Infrastructure Server 15:48:35 sgallagh: oh of course 15:49:25 What I mean is for right now I'm going to focus on comps changes to Infra Server 15:49:52 What I mean is that I should have noticed the direct applicability to our target audience :) 15:50:39 I think we're in violent agreement and should move on :) 15:52:30 NO, I AGREE MORE!!!! 15:52:57 I still need to work out with dgilmore the creation of the release packages 15:53:13 Even if we just create some placeholder ones we can start using in Requires: 15:54:04 that seems the concrete step towards meeting the change freeze deadline 15:54:22 * sgallagh nods 15:54:35 * adamw really needs to catch up with that discussion 15:56:27 I'll prep a straw-man patch immediately after the meeting 15:59:45 #action sgallagh to provide a holdover fedora-release-$PRODUCT patch 16:02:08 nirik: Are you aware of other issues that we need to solve for the Alpha? 16:02:40 I think those are the biggies... we need to be able to compose something we can test. ;) 16:03:14 OK, so I've got most of those on my plate... that's going to be a bit heavy. 16:03:29 (Thanks mitr for jumping on the kickstart/compose tests) 16:04:22 I can't think of anything obvious I can hand off though. 16:04:38 OK, anything further on this topic, or shall we move on? 16:05:43 OK, we didn't have anything else on the agenda as far as I am aware 16:05:47 #topic Open Floor 16:06:01 Anything for Open Floor? 16:07:02 nope. 16:07:02 CentOS 7 was release yesterday...have we had any interaction with their SIG lately? 16:07:30 * danofsatx-work is installing right now to play with it 16:07:30 danofsatx-work: Not recently, now. 16:07:34 s/now/no/ 16:09:40 ok, just thought I would ask - we're all a bit busy at the moment ;) 16:09:44 No kidding. 16:09:55 Ok, I'm going to call the meeting to an end and get to work on those patches. 16:10:04 Thanks (and sorry I was so late!) 16:10:40 #endmeeting