19:06:00 #startmeeting Cloud WG 19:06:00 Meeting started Wed Dec 3 19:06:00 2014 UTC. The chair is roshi. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 19:06:00 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #halp #info #idea #link #topic. 19:06:06 #meetingname Cloud WG 19:06:06 The meeting name has been set to 'cloud_wg' 19:06:09 #topic Roll Call 19:06:18 .hellomynameis kushal 19:06:18 who's around for some cloud goodness? 19:06:19 kushal: kushal 'Kushal Das' 19:06:23 .hello roshi 19:06:24 roshi: roshi 'Mike Ruckman' 19:06:32 .hellomynameis dustymabe 19:06:33 dustymabe: dustymabe 'Dusty Mabe' 19:07:17 .hellomynameis jzb 19:07:18 jzb: jzb 'Joe Brockmeier' 19:08:04 alright, found logs 19:08:05 :) 19:08:14 roshi: were they hiding? 19:08:23 #topic Prev. Meeting follow-up 19:08:35 jzb will update fedora dockerfiles ticket (#84) in coming weeks with more plans 19:08:43 still on point with that jzb ? 19:08:49 roshi: yes 19:09:07 roshi: but last week being a holiday and all I partook in being slothful and didn't do anything. 19:09:26 no worries - it was a short week for most of us I think :) 19:09:42 roshi FYI https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/cloud/2014-September/004289.html 19:10:18 thanks dustymabe 19:10:21 dustymabe, Thank you :) 19:10:36 #topic Docker image page text (#85) 19:10:43 #link https://fedorahosted.org/cloud/ticket/85 19:11:27 argh. That's me. I will finish today. 19:11:37 sounds good 19:11:43 * scollier here 19:11:49 welcome scollier :) 19:12:40 #action jzb to get a draft together for the copy on the docker page 19:13:03 #action others to contribute to the draft once it's done 19:13:07 anything else for this? 19:13:25 I'll put new text in the ticket + forward to list 19:13:32 so if anyone has comments, put 'em there. 19:13:33 sounds good 19:13:36 please 19:13:38 :-) 19:13:55 #topic Publicize fedora-dockerfiles (#84) 19:13:57 #link https://fedorahosted.org/cloud/ticket/84 19:14:04 you again jzb :) 19:14:42 roshi: didn't we just do this ticket? 19:14:53 I feel a little Deja-Vu 19:14:53 Even I am supposed to do few more new blog posts on this, but this is a long running process. 19:15:06 last was docker download page, this is dockerfiles 19:15:19 yeah - it's not constrained to release time 19:15:20 roshi: scroll up ;-) 19:15:36 less of a priority 19:15:41 oh, prev followup 19:15:41 roshi: 19:08 < roshi> jzb will update fedora dockerfiles ticket (#84) in coming weeks with more plans 19:15:43 haha 19:16:02 yeah, having them split out like that in the minutes makes me do things twice some times :) 19:16:05 sorry 19:16:06 moving on 19:16:40 #topic Upload Criteria (#80) 19:16:45 #link https://fedorahosted.org/cloud/ticket/80 19:17:32 I still have to put this on the final release criteria 19:17:40 but we're on track to not violate it :) 19:18:16 sorry, been focusing on testing and other QA stuff atm 19:18:23 and it's going to be a long night it looks like 19:18:24 roshi: I think we're all in favor now - we can probably close it once you add to the criteria 19:18:30 yeah 19:18:35 that's what it's waiting on :-/ 19:18:42 once I get it in there I'll close the ticket 19:18:58 roshi: hang in there - we're in the home stretch! 19:19:06 roshi: you'll be able to sleep soon 19:19:12 #action roshi to update the criteria and close the ticket (#80) 19:19:18 lies :p 19:19:35 I checked my alcohol store, should be good to go :p 19:19:51 #topic OpenshiftCommons (#83) 19:19:54 #link https://fedorahosted.org/cloud/ticket/83 19:20:02 can I get a tl;dr on this? 19:20:39 I wasn't here for last meeting but from what I remember people were waiting to hear back from someone? 19:20:42 never looked into it really... 19:20:43 No updates on this yet. 19:20:46 pyhtondj or something like that 19:20:51 dustymabe: the board or the upstream, one. 19:21:01 jzb, both :) 19:21:38 kushal: or that 19:22:21 who were the people that send pythondj a note and are waiting to hear back? 19:22:25 I think number80 19:23:16 dustymabe: I sent her a note but it was more from the Project Atomic side. 19:24:09 dustymabe, even I sent one. 19:24:47 hey 19:24:51 here's a thought 19:24:56 * jzb goes to look in #openshift 19:25:10 dang 19:25:12 no such luck 19:25:41 Email it is. 19:25:50 yeah I donI would volunteer to head up the effort if I had spare cycles. 19:25:57 I don't really know what it is right now 19:26:01 dustymabe: it's not urgent anyway 19:26:08 I would volunteer to head up the effort if I had spare cycles. 19:26:52 doesn't look like much for us to do with this ticket until we hear back 19:27:04 #topic Open Floor 19:27:12 anyone have anything for open floor? 19:27:54 roshi: not right now. still working with DO. I am going to get our RC4 into their infra next and start working with that. 19:28:00 nice 19:28:04 We have a review request up for rocket. 19:28:13 that's what I was going to bring up 19:28:18 kushal: link, pls? 19:28:19 what's the plan with rocket? 19:28:34 #link https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1169966 19:28:40 roshi: we should plan on including it for F22, I think. 19:28:46 clearly it's too late for Fedora 21 19:28:46 roshi, First we should provide a package 19:28:49 will it be ready by then? 19:29:00 roshi: define "ready" ;-) 19:29:11 roshi, it is usable now 19:29:13 roshi: this is Fedora after all. "First" is part of our charter. 19:29:32 do we need a fedora-rocketfiles repo? for the manifest.json files? 19:29:42 lol 19:29:45 a fair point 19:30:22 What I understood, the developers should think clearly before writing an app for containers 19:30:31 you can build rocket images off of the fedora containers. and we have a large repo. 19:31:07 having said that, not 100% sure of the portability and level of effort required. 19:31:13 scollier: do you "lose" anything with Docker containers and rkt? 19:31:32 scollier, you can do that from a running containers 19:31:40 jzb, i'm experimenting now.. i can't really comment ATM. 19:31:43 kushal, you run the container, and then docker export that container. 19:31:54 that gets exported to a "rootfs" 19:32:00 yes 19:32:21 which, is added to the manifest.json file, and gets re-wrapped into a rocket .aci file. 19:32:21 which can then be, in theory, run. 19:33:22 I will try that tomorrow 19:33:48 i think it's worth looking into. and if there are no objections, we can create a fedora-rocketfiles (or w/e) repo, and start sharing. 19:34:02 sounds good to me 19:34:15 will atomic be able to run rocket containers? 19:34:31 scollier: no objections here 19:34:44 roshi, provided the package listed above is in the tree, and the rkt bin is there, yes. 19:34:51 cool 19:34:55 roshi: we haven't officially discussed this but once we've packaged it, I would like to include rkt in Atomic yeah 19:35:06 * roshi couldn't really tell how much different it was and whatnot 19:35:14 since I'm just starting to learn/get used to docker 19:35:18 though... here's a can o' worms 19:35:21 jzb: we would ship docker and rocket in the same tree? 19:35:31 should we worry about plain lxc containers? 19:35:50 dustymabe, i'd say, why not? 19:35:55 dustymabe: I think so? I don't think rkt will take up too much space, and I don't think they conflict 19:36:01 we need to make our naming more generic then 19:36:07 docker-host is not going to fly 19:36:13 ^ true. 19:36:14 dustymabe: yeah, container-host 19:36:27 or "super-awesome-host" 19:36:31 or just call it "transit" 19:36:35 or "ship" 19:37:42 continue on with the shipping container idea 19:37:46 * roshi doesn't know 19:37:57 https://github.com/fedora-cloud/Fedora-Rocketfiles 19:37:57 :) 19:38:20 that was quick :) 19:39:06 well, seems we're all on the same page 19:39:10 anything else? 19:39:12 scollier: could you add me to that repo? 19:39:16 or am I already 19:39:17 ? 19:39:27 scollier: I'm jzb on GitHub, btw. 19:40:03 jzb, you are already in that organization. 19:40:51 woohoo 19:41:58 scollier: is there a list of people who are? 19:42:05 should we make all of the WG be members? 19:42:09 click the org name 19:42:19 dustymabe, https://github.com/fedora-cloud 19:42:23 should show a list there. 19:42:35 it does 19:42:39 ahh. got it 19:42:40 dustymabe, but you don't have to be a member to fork and submit a PR 19:42:47 yeah 19:42:53 dustymabe, the "members" are admins of sorts. 19:42:56 scollier: yep. as I have learned :) 19:43:10 I don't see a ton of point in adding us all (even though I'd like the little badge thing under my profile :P) 19:43:38 roshi, i agree 19:45:53 well, anything else to discuss? or can we call it? 19:47:02 roshi: call it 19:47:02 * roshi gets the fuse out... 19:47:08 * roshi sets fuse 19:47:10 oh wait 19:47:10 3... 19:47:18 quick note - go look at the final release announcement on the wiki 19:47:26 !!DETONATION ABORTED!! 19:47:38 should be good, but if there are any comments, changes, the readiness meeting is tomorrow 19:47:42 that's all 19:47:45 sweet 19:47:47 please recommence detonation 19:47:58 !! RECOMMENCING !! 19:48:01 2... 19:48:14 1... 19:48:28 thanks for coming folks! 19:48:31 #endmeeting