19:02:54 #startmeeting 19:02:54 Meeting started Wed Dec 17 19:02:54 2014 UTC. The chair is kushal. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 19:02:54 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #halp #info #idea #link #topic. 19:03:13 #meetingname Fedora Cloud Sig 19:03:13 The meeting name has been set to 'fedora_cloud_sig' 19:03:21 #topic roll call 19:03:27 .hellomynameis dustymabe 19:03:28 .hellomynameis 19:03:30 er 19:03:30 dustymabe: dustymabe 'Dusty Mabe' 19:03:33 .hellomynameis jzb 19:03:33 jzb: (hellomynameis ) -- Return brief information about a Fedora Account System username. Useful for things like meeting roll call and calling attention to yourself. 19:03:36 jzb: jzb 'Joe Brockmeier' 19:03:42 jsmith, agrimm roshi ping 19:03:49 .hellomynameis kushal 19:03:50 kushal: kushal 'Kushal Das' 19:05:03 Anyone else here? 19:05:16 .hellomynameis soumya 19:05:17 number80, 19:05:17 soumyaC: soumya 'Soumya Kanti Chakraborty' 19:05:27 oddshocks: ? 19:05:59 jzb, I think people are in holiday mood :) 19:06:03 soumyaC, Welcome :) 19:06:04 kushal: I concur. 19:06:22 i think roshi said he wouldn't be around today 19:06:23 kushal: maybe first order should be cancelling next week's meeting and possibly the week after. 19:06:40 Yeah 19:06:43 dustymabe, Okay. 19:07:04 #topic No meeting on 25th and 1st January. 19:07:34 Ah, that is IST :( 19:07:52 Should be 24th and 31st 19:08:04 :) 19:08:05 That means next meeting should be on 7th. 19:08:14 Is that okay with everyone? 19:08:20 sounds ok to me 19:08:45 jzb, ? 19:08:46 kushal, here. 19:08:58 kushal: +1 19:09:06 scollier, thanks for coming down. I missed to ping you, sorry for that. 19:09:23 scollier, Discussing the next meeting date. 19:09:29 7th January. 19:10:11 kushal, kk, +1 19:10:23 #info Next Cloud SIG meeting will be on 7th January 2015 19:10:31 kushal, sorry, I can't be here today. leaving for the airport right now 19:10:47 agrimm, No problem, have a safe trip and great holidays :) 19:11:06 what kushal said 19:11:14 #topic Previous action items 19:11:54 There was none as I can see in http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2014-12-10/fedora_cloud_sig.2014-12-10-19.02.txt 19:12:11 We can move to tickets. 19:12:39 #topic publicize fedora-dockerfiles (#84) 19:13:01 that'd be mine. I broke it down into sub-tickets 19:13:05 listed in the ticket 19:13:07 I think Fedora Magazine Post: How to Use Dockerfiles, https://fedorahosted.org/cloud/ticket/87 will also come into this. 19:13:13 haven't made much progress aside from that. 19:13:39 jzb, Okay, no hurries. 19:13:41 yeah, I will try to get that up on Fedora Magazine soon 19:13:53 jzb, happy to review as you make progress. 19:13:55 #action jzb work on Ticket 87 (Fedora Magazine Post on Dockerfiles) 19:14:12 scollier, I am also supposed to write one and show you :) 19:14:19 scollier: I have a new agenda item about Dockerfiles I wanted to get your feedback on, actually :-) 19:14:23 happy to review that too 19:14:29 jzb, ok 19:15:32 kushal: EOF 19:15:59 jzb, Do you want to discuss the new idea here or during open floor? 19:16:38 kushal: oh, I was going to wait but I can do it now 19:16:57 jzb, discuss it now :) We anyway have very less items to discuss :) 19:16:57 basically, the CentOS folks were asking about merging the Dockerfile repos 19:17:03 scollier: ^^ 19:17:06 jzb, hmm 19:17:09 ok 19:17:17 they'd like to have one repo for both, combine efforts 19:17:28 jzb, what would name of said repo be? 19:17:59 i'm def open to help on fedora-dockerfiles and contributing to their stuff as well 19:17:59 scollier: TBD - I didn't get that far into the details, but I think it'd make sense if we collaborated on them. 19:18:31 jzb, just off the top of my head, would there be instances where packages wouldn't be avail in cent that would in Fedora? 19:18:39 scollier, correct 19:18:40 jzb, that def exists with RHEL 19:18:43 scollier: yeah 19:18:55 scollier: jperrin had talked about having a CentOS / Fedora branch 19:18:57 so that would have to be coordinated somehow to let people know what they are getting 19:19:15 jzb, that would work 19:19:28 jzb, other thing is, we'd need to make sure that works to generate images on the docker hub 19:19:37 i _think_ you can off branches, but i haven't tried 19:19:46 so we'd need to keep that functionality 19:20:03 scollier: sure. I think the main thing was to establish if we were interested in doing it. 19:20:14 jzb, i'm interested. 19:20:20 scollier: awesome. 19:20:40 #action jzb create ticket for defining dockerfile collaboration 19:20:48 scollier: I'll CC you on that? ^^ 19:20:57 jzb, yup 19:21:11 kushal: OK, that's all on that for now. 19:21:30 jzb, scollier Thanks :) 19:21:38 #topic participation in OpenShift Commons (#83) 19:22:11 As we discussed, it is now out of our hand and waiting on board and others (iirc). 19:22:35 If no other comments, we can move to open floor. 19:23:47 #topic Open Floor 19:23:58 dustymabe, Any update from digital ocean? 19:24:02 kushal: yep 19:24:12 working diligently with their team this week 19:24:25 hoping to have something by friday/monday 19:24:55 do I have anybody in here with a digital ocean account that we can share some images with to help out testing? 19:25:13 I don't 19:25:28 They should give us a test account :) 19:27:18 kushal: they offered 19:27:28 the problem is with legal right now 19:27:43 accepting the TOS when you create an account 19:27:53 still working with mattdm, etc.. on that 19:28:02 which reminds me that I should send an email 19:28:08 dustymabe, Okay. 19:28:27 anywho I'll send an email to the list to ask for some help testink 19:28:37 testing.. I know roshi and oddshocks have DO accounts 19:29:12 #info dustymabe will ask for help on list to test DO Fedora image. 19:29:42 kushal: I don't expect too much to be broken. I just want to make sure there aren't some things in there infra that would cause issues. 19:30:22 kushal: I guess we can move on 19:30:36 should we discuss the ec2 images.. did anyone else see the emails on the list? 19:30:37 Anyone else any point for Open Floor. 19:30:47 mattdm did you get up with oddshocks ? 19:30:51 dustymabe, oh, let me check. 19:33:24 dustymabe, both oddshocks and mattdm are missing from here as it seems. 19:33:38 kushal: yeah.. I guess I will trust they have it handled for now 19:33:43 #info AMI(s) are asking minimum 12GB space. 19:33:59 will poke in due time if it isn't fixed 19:34:24 if we release an image in january it would be good to have that fixed 19:34:26 dustymabe, yeah 19:35:35 I guess I can close the meeting now. 19:35:44 If nothing else comes up in 5. 19:35:46 4 19:35:50 3 19:35:54 2 19:35:59 1 19:36:04 #endmeeting