19:02:25 #startmeeting Fedora Cloud SIG 19:02:25 Meeting started Wed Jan 14 19:02:25 2015 UTC. The chair is kushal. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 19:02:25 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #halp #info #idea #link #topic. 19:02:45 .hellomynameis jzb 19:02:49 jzb: jzb 'Joe Brockmeier' 19:02:49 .hello roshi 19:02:50 #meetingname Fedora Cloud SIG 19:02:50 The meeting name has been set to 'fedora_cloud_sig' 19:02:52 roshi: roshi 'Mike Ruckman' 19:02:57 #topic roll call 19:03:02 .hellomynameis kushal 19:03:03 kushal: kushal 'Kushal Das' 19:03:08 .hellomynameis hguemar 19:03:09 number80: hguemar 'Haïkel Guémar' 19:03:09 .hellomynameis lsm5 19:03:12 lsm5: lsm5 'Lokesh Mandvekar' 19:03:14 .hellomynameis scollier 19:03:15 scollier: scollier 'Scott Collier' 19:03:26 .hellomynameis langdon 19:03:30 langdon: langdon 'Langdon White' 19:03:47 * langdon needs to step away for 10 mins.. but will be back 19:04:07 Anyone else? 19:04:19 rtnpro, jsmith ? 19:04:30 .hellomynameis jsmith 19:04:31 jsmith: jsmith 'Jared Smith' 19:04:36 Sorry I'm late... 19:04:40 ... busy day today :-( 19:04:47 jsmith, not started fully yet :) 19:05:00 dustymabe, yay, you are here. 19:05:09 kushal: only in spirit :) 19:05:10 even though you said you will not be :p 19:05:20 * gholms takes a seat in the bleachers 19:05:22 I probably won't be engaged much 19:05:24 gholms, :D 19:06:03 #topic Action items from last week's meeting 19:06:12 * oddshocks will update #68 when he has something to test. 19:06:12 * jzb write "how to use dockerfiles" by next Cloud SIG meeting 19:06:12 * Kushal will send CI details to scollier and langdon 19:06:12 * Kushal to test the patch from lsm5 on docker image timezone. 19:06:16 I will go first. 19:06:40 About CI whatever I found, I sent it to both scollier and langdon. 19:06:53 * kushal and lsm5 are working on the timezone patch. 19:06:53 kushal: still in progress 19:07:06 kushal, i got it. Thanks. 19:07:10 oddshocks, you there? 19:07:21 kushal: would be great to have scratch builds going on real koji if possible 19:07:37 lsm5, yeah, I just wish. 19:08:11 lsm5, build is successful btw :) 19:08:28 kushal: ooh nice .. 19:08:31 lsm5, I will pass you the details after the meeting. 19:08:37 kushal: wonder what's messed up on my system 19:08:39 kushal: thanks 19:09:38 Moving to current items. 19:09:49 #topic support HVM instances in EC2 (#68) 19:09:59 It is on oddshocks. 19:10:38 According to the ticket the image is out. 19:11:21 next 19:11:31 #topic publicize fedora-dockerfiles (#84) 19:11:40 jzb, already informed worked is going on. 19:11:46 s/worked/work 19:12:28 jzb, feel free to add an action item :) 19:12:40 kushal: still in progress from last week 19:12:53 kushal: so we'll hold pat on that one. 19:13:40 * langdon back 19:14:00 jzb, Okay. 19:14:03 kushal, just as FYI, we should prob publicize the images on docker hub as well 19:14:15 kushal, to date, not including the base image, we have ~ 30k downloads. 19:14:25 scollier, cool. 19:14:52 scollier, I never managed to write anything on them yet, can you please write some posts too? we all can share them. 19:15:38 kushal, sure. also, i posted: http://www.colliernotes.com/2015/01/flannel-and-docker-on-fedora-getting.html which is flannel on fedora, but should be a quick start for folks evaluating the tech. 19:15:59 kushal, that was posted yesterday 19:16:37 scollier, ah, I read that post, but never read who wrote it. Stupid me :( 19:16:44 #link http://www.colliernotes.com/2015/01/flannel-and-docker-on-fedora-getting.html 19:17:11 scollier: why not on Fedora Magazine? :-) 19:17:41 jzb, good question. i should do that more often. sry. 19:18:22 jzb, do we have a wiki page which explains how one can start writing on Fedora magazine? 19:18:49 kushal: most likely 19:19:13 kushal, jzb: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Magazine/Howtopost 19:19:26 yeah, that 19:19:32 scollier beat me to it 19:19:42 http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Magazine/Howtopost 19:19:43 scollier, jzb Thanks :) 19:19:51 jzb: we should have a magazine post that tells users about that page :) 19:19:54 (so its get added to the minutes) 19:21:05 dustymabe: I am pretty sure there has been one. 19:21:16 dustymabe: aren't you not here? 19:21:27 * dustymabe vanishes 19:22:34 moving nect 19:22:37 * next 19:22:57 #topic Update Timezone for the docker images (#91) 19:23:29 I just now tested a patch which will update the timezone to UTC, I will commit it after the meeting. 19:23:33 lsm5, thanks for the help.l 19:23:41 oops, too many typos tonight. 19:23:44 kushal: np :) 19:23:57 After that I will update the ticket. 19:23:57 kushal: so it works?? 19:24:04 lsm5, as it seems. 19:24:08 \m/ 19:24:17 anaconda showed that while installation. 19:25:01 jzb, should we repaste the dockerfile related tickets here? we already discussed them. 19:26:19 I guess we can skip them as already discussed. 19:26:49 sorry 19:26:57 Fedora Magazine Post: How to Use Dockerfiles (#87) and Social Media for Dockerfiles (#88) 19:26:58 kushal: I don't think so 19:27:07 jzb, okay :) 19:27:08 * oddshocks late 19:27:23 oddshocks, thanks for the HVM images :D 19:27:41 #topic Decide whether to update cloud image to not include ruby (#90) 19:27:54 Sure thing, hope there haven't been any issues :) 19:28:07 less is better here 19:28:09 I just updated the ticket that we do not have ruby in the nightly cloud base builds anymore. 19:28:25 number80, yeah, it got automatically removed. 19:29:09 # Open floor 19:29:14 #topic Open floor 19:29:33 The deadline for the feature proposal coming, 20th of this month. 19:29:42 jzb, kushal i would like to propose that fedora-cloud build an "official" vagrant box 19:29:53 langdon: +1 19:29:54 langdon, Please go ahead. 19:29:56 jzb, not sure if you filed a ticket 19:30:11 langdon: you mean feature request/proposal/whatever? 19:30:24 langdon: I haven't yet, I can take that I guess 19:30:29 jzb, honestly.. no clue.. what do i do to propose it? 19:30:36 langdon: I'll take it and add you 19:30:38 i can do it if i know where/how 19:30:41 ahh ok 19:30:46 langdon, I am going to drop a mail to the list about that in few minutes. 19:30:47 #action jzb propose the Vagrant feature for F22 19:30:50 langdon: does that require that we get chef in packages repo ? 19:30:59 number80, no 19:31:23 number80, not proposing we "ship" vagrant (although that is in the works) this is just an "iso" for use in vagrant 19:31:55 langdon: we already ship vagrant (with kvm plugin) but vagrant image used to require chef installed in the image 19:32:06 and we don't have chef in our repositories 19:32:10 from an effort perspective, ian mcleod has written an image factory plugin for it that should be consumable by koji 19:32:32 number80, i don't think that's still required 19:32:37 there's that "S" word :p 19:32:42 we also really need to get our **** together and actually ship vagrant 19:32:45 scollier: if that's the case, then it's ok 19:32:51 langdon, http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Policy 19:33:00 jzb, jstribny is working on it.. along with vondruch... 19:33:11 number80, i just looked at a fedora box running on fedora with vagrant / libvirt, the fedora box doesn't have chef 19:33:16 * number80 more worried about providing good experience with an official vagrant image 19:33:18 i think that's what you are referring to 19:33:23 number80, im confused.. so fedora ships a vagrant box somewhere? 19:33:38 langdon: no, I meant we ship the vagrant software 19:33:46 number80, ahhh.. ok 19:34:15 coprs for f20 and f21 exist.. working on unbundling to get in fedora main.. or thinking playground.. 19:34:43 vagrant ships bundling ruby.. so .. not chef .. but ruby instead :) 19:35:10 kushal, so.. i wasn't sure if this was a "feature" or a fed-cloud ticket 19:35:21 langdon, put it as feature 19:35:26 at some point, it used chef for provisionning inside the virtual machine 19:35:27 fesco can decide more :) 19:35:47 roshi, you will also file a proposal 19:35:52 so are we pushing the Features bit for getting mentions in release notes and whatnot? 19:35:59 number80, yeah.. chef is now an option but not default.. (i believe).. it just uses shell/ssh by default now.. 19:36:00 roshi, Yes. 19:36:05 roshi, we will do that. 19:36:06 http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Policy/Definitions 19:36:25 for testcloud, I'm still not convinced it meets the criteria 19:36:42 so, jzb, you will file feature? 19:36:44 roshi, It does. 19:36:55 under which bit of the checklist? 19:37:20 just the publicity one? 19:37:22 roshi, I personally think so for developersl. 19:37:27 eeee 19:37:34 roshi, developers. 19:37:48 i.e. users. 19:38:12 kushal, roshi arguably.. testcloud and vagrant boxes are being shipped by cloud but consumed by workstation... so it should really appear in their notes as well 19:38:23 langdon, Yeah. 19:38:57 hrm 19:39:00 langdon: yes 19:39:08 jzb, cool, thanks 19:39:25 roshi: what's the worst that could happen? ;-) 19:39:37 roshi: if you file as a feature and they say "not needed" no biggie. 19:40:01 roshi: though if you file as a feature and it makes the list it will also help us remember to put it into marketing materials. 19:40:07 but if they say "Yeah, looks good." then there's another meeting and stuff I have to track :p 19:40:34 roshi, lol 19:40:56 tbh though, I have no idea what "attending feature status meetings" looks like 19:41:31 * langdon guesses it probably isn't an excuse for more beer 19:41:39 jzb, what about Bare metal installer for Atomic? 19:41:46 langdon: you need an excuse? 19:41:47 lsm5, you should file one on rocket? 19:41:51 kushal: that's on my list 19:42:26 jzb, who is going to do the feature on Flannel? 19:43:11 also "Overlay packages for rpm-ostree" 19:43:25 kushal: is one needed? 19:43:31 kushal: flannel is already packaged for F212 19:43:33 er, F21 19:43:43 presumably it'll be in F212 if we get that far. 19:43:48 jzb, I got that from your reply to the thread. 19:43:57 jzb, haha 19:44:11 kushal: Yeah, I thought it hadn't made it - but it did. 19:44:24 jzb, and the os-tree one? 19:44:46 kushal: I'll check in with Colin on that to make sure it's something he (still) feels good about. 19:44:57 jzb, Okay, thanks. 19:45:02 kushal: sorry got distracted ... 19:45:26 kushal: file ticket you mean? 19:45:41 lsm5, not ticket but a feature proposal 19:45:51 lsm5, http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Policy 19:47:13 kushal: i'll take a look at this (haven't filed such a thing before) 19:47:42 lsm5, if you need help then you can ping us. 19:48:19 kushal: sure thing 19:48:24 lsm5, :) 19:48:36 Anything else for the open floor? 19:49:16 just, jzb, feature for vagrant-fedora-cloud and vagrant-fedora-atomic, right? 19:50:02 langdon: right 19:50:08 cool 19:52:45 anything else? 19:52:52 or we can close this meeting. 19:53:33 * roshi doesn't have anything 19:53:39 #endmeeting