16:00:05 #startmeeting fpc 16:00:05 Meeting started Thu Aug 17 16:00:05 2017 UTC. The chair is geppetto. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 16:00:05 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #halp #info #idea #link #topic. 16:00:05 The meeting name has been set to 'fpc' 16:00:05 #meetingname fpc 16:00:05 The meeting name has been set to 'fpc' 16:00:06 #topic Roll Call 16:00:14 Hi 16:00:17 hello 16:00:18 Hey 16:00:19 hi 16:00:24 #chair mbooth 16:00:24 Current chairs: geppetto mbooth 16:00:27 #chair orionp 16:00:27 Current chairs: geppetto mbooth orionp 16:01:47 #chair racor 16:01:47 Current chairs: geppetto mbooth orionp racor 16:08:06 Well number 5 is not looking good 16:08:21 Just old tickets again this week, so not the end of the world. 16:08:31 * limburgher here 16:08:36 h aha 16:08:41 #chair limburgher 16:08:41 Current chairs: geppetto limburgher mbooth orionp racor 16:08:52 55555! 16:09:16 \o/ 16:09:23 #topic Schedule 16:09:25 https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/packaging@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/4WKJS4LQHF2KJRCBOX7JAWKTV3POWFM7/ 16:10:23 #topic #654 glibc file triggers 16:10:26 .fpc 654 16:10:29 geppetto: Issue #654: glibc file triggers - packaging-committee - Pagure - https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/issue/654 16:12:39 So … not much to discuss … big update from tibbs. Does anyone want to help out? 16:12:50 Anyone have any comments/suggestions? 16:13:23 would be nice if tibbs were here - but it seems reasonable to require that symlinks are packaged. Somewhat surprised that they aren't if that's the case 16:13:33 yeh 16:14:08 I think the difference might be between "they should/must be there" in the policy … and failing the build if they aren't there 16:16:37 Nods 16:17:18 can you run ldconfig for libs installed into %{buildroot}? 16:17:44 inside the chroot, yeh 16:18:20 I don't think ldconfig has it's own chroot option, if that's what you mean 16:20:05 I guess it would run ldconfig -n %{buildroot}%{_libdir} 16:20:55 maybe … -N too? 16:21:12 there is a -r option 16:22:06 -n implies -N, not sure about processing files that might not end up in the search path 16:22:59 ahh 16:23:14 hmm, yeah -r might be good - might process installed /etc/ld.so.conf.d files 16:23:25 so "ldconfig -r %{buildroot}" I guess 16:23:33 * geppetto nods 16:23:46 except that might create a cache, which we don't want 16:24:07 ldconfig -rN hten 16:25:45 sounds fine 16:26:28 #info ldconfig -Nr %{buildroot} … seems like it should be the command to run. 16:28:36 Ok … moving on. 16:28:45 #topic #696 Packages not following the Guidelines for bundled libraries 16:28:48 .fpc 696 16:28:49 geppetto: Issue #696: Many packages are not following the Guidelines for bundled libraries - packaging-committee - Pagure - https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/issue/696 16:30:42 With the typo fix I'm happy to +1 … the last comment seems redundant as it already mentions what to do if a version can't be found. 16:30:55 But if anyone has some gnulib generic wording, I'm happy to listen 16:31:36 I'm +1 now and in the ticket 16:31:52 limburgher: mbooth: racor: vote? 16:32:09 +1 16:32:15 reading 696 ;) 16:32:53 Yeah +1 16:32:59 * geppetto nods … no problem, this is the last ticket so feel free to take your time 16:33:56 +1 16:33:58 * mbooth wishes people would type these ticket very slowly because I only read very slowly :-p 16:34:25 #action Update for Guidelines on bundled libs. (+1:5, 0:0, -1:0) 16:34:34 mbooth: +1 :) 16:34:41 #topic Open Floor 16:34:59 Ok, that's it for tickets that have changed … anyone have anything? 16:35:53 mbooth: #thestruggleisreal 16:36:02 Nope. 16:38:15 * geppetto nods … ok, I'l close in a minute or so then. Unless anyone shouts :) 16:38:42 Remember next week will be Wednesday again, and two weeks from now will be flock so I probably won't be here. 16:41:10 #endmeeting