16:29:42 #startmeeting fedora_atomic_wg 16:29:42 Meeting started Wed Apr 18 16:29:42 2018 UTC. The chair is miabbott. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 16:29:42 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #halp #info #idea #link #topic. 16:29:42 The meeting name has been set to 'fedora_atomic_wg' 16:29:52 #topic roll call 16:29:58 .hello miabbott 16:29:59 miabbott: miabbott 'Micah Abbott' 16:30:09 .hello2 16:30:10 lorbus: lorbus 'Christian Glombek' 16:30:39 .hellomynameis kushal 16:30:40 kushal: kushal 'Kushal Das' 16:30:48 .hello jberkus 16:30:49 jberkus: jberkus 'Josh Berkus' 16:31:17 #chair lorbus kushal jberkus 16:31:17 Current chairs: jberkus kushal lorbus miabbott 16:31:20 .hello sayanchowdhury 16:31:21 sayan: sayanchowdhury 'Sayan Chowdhury' 16:31:34 .hello sinnykumari 16:31:35 ksinny: sinnykumari 'Sinny Kumari' 16:31:46 .hellomynameis sanja 16:31:47 sanja_: sanja 'Sanja Bonic' 16:32:20 * sanja_ double-booked but other meeting should be over in 10-15 16:32:26 .hello2 16:32:27 dustymabe: dustymabe 'Dusty Mabe' 16:32:34 hi everyone 16:32:48 #chair sayan ksinny sanja_ dustymabe 16:32:48 Current chairs: dustymabe jberkus ksinny kushal lorbus miabbott sanja_ sayan 16:33:43 hi o/ 16:34:27 * x3mboy just lurking to see what's new? 16:34:46 dang this is a low turnout even for us 16:35:01 #topic previous meeting action items 16:35:07 * cverna to open additional tickets for implementing container release 16:35:07 changes 16:35:23 i think i saw that cverna when afk a bit ago 16:36:12 skimming the issues, i don't see any new ones from cverna, so i will just re-action that 16:36:32 #action cverna to open additional tickets for implementing container release changes 16:36:42 .hello2 davdunc 16:36:42 davdunc: davdunc 'David Duncan' 16:36:49 #chair davdunc 16:36:49 Current chairs: davdunc dustymabe jberkus ksinny kushal lorbus miabbott sanja_ sayan 16:37:06 #topic Evaluate podman for inclusion in atomic host (422) 16:37:09 #link https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/422 16:37:22 just added a comment to the ticket 16:37:33 always with the last minute changes... 16:37:58 thanks dustymabe 16:38:06 #topic coordinate Project Atomic-related talks for devconf.in (447) 16:38:16 #link https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/447 16:38:45 * ksinny needs to submit one, haven't submitted yet 16:38:49 ksinny did you get any feedback from the APAC meeting? 16:39:49 miabbott: we were only two people in last meeting. I tried to the other guy him to submit , he might submit one 16:40:00 ah, ok 16:40:14 yeah, I've read the email notes, thanks for that again ksinny :) 16:40:23 sanja_: do you think emailing the atomic-devel list might help generate some submissions? 16:40:28 sanja_: no problem 16:40:39 * cverna around again :) 16:40:41 miabbott yeah I'll do that right now, no need to action it 16:40:47 thanks! 16:40:55 * cverna waves at the crowd 16:41:00 hey cverna 16:41:03 cverna: \o/ 16:42:00 #topic F28 Atomic Beta and Openshift Origin 3.9 results in nodes NotReady (452) 16:42:03 #link https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/452 16:42:09 I really can't personally do more than one trip to Asia this year 16:42:16 dustymabe: care to give a summary about this issue? 16:42:34 miabbott: sure 16:42:56 basically where we are now is to ask systemd to revert the change that broke assumptions runc/kube/openshift was making 16:43:13 systemd maintainer seemed on board. I need to grab him again to see if we made any progress 16:43:47 and there is a Freeze Exception for the systemd bug, correct? 16:44:22 there is. 16:44:29 but that assumes systemd is willing to make the change 16:44:51 zbyszek was going to try to convince other maintainers it was the right thing to do 16:45:10 do we have a fallback in case the systemd revert doesn't happen? 16:45:13 so, we are not moving reverting back to previous working systemd? 16:45:53 we don't really have a fallback other than "if you run kube/openshift then don't use this first release of F28 AH" 16:45:57 ah ok, we are talking hee about systemd revert 16:46:02 here* 16:47:05 that's all I have 16:47:22 thanks dustymabe 16:47:25 maybe walters or someone could give us a scratch build with the change reverted 16:47:35 so we can at least test 16:47:43 #topic open floor 16:47:58 i know jberkus wanted to talk about RH Summit Demos 16:48:28 yes! 16:48:59 mo ment, talking on conf call 16:49:35 * kushal has one item. 16:49:35 sayan: can you give us an update on fedimg 16:49:44 dustymabe: yes 16:50:18 Last week I released fedimg==1.2.0 16:50:49 which fixes a bunch of issues, primarily the authorization issues with AWS 16:51:10 ok, back, sorry, bad agenda timing 16:51:10 changelog: https://github.com/fedora-infra/fedimg/blob/develop/CHANGELOG.rst#120 16:51:23 sayan: and we're still working through issues 16:51:44 so we'll be delaying f27AH release until those issues are resolved 16:51:45 and there are few issues still left, so we are working on it 16:51:54 dustymabe: yes 16:52:04 thanks sayan 16:52:17 #info F27AH release will be delayed until fedimg issues are resolved 16:53:10 jberkus i think you are up again 16:53:20 ! 16:53:55 yes: 16:54:02 https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/118H3-d30FK1PFwlKV5DaZ7pFiTD-4mY0LD6pOQkIoeI/edit#gid=0 16:54:13 we unexpectedly now have our own pod at Summit 16:54:20 for Atomic/general container stuff 16:54:30 which means that we need folks to demo things! 16:54:44 buildah, workstation, system containers, ostree, etc. 16:55:12 so 1. who will be at summit? 16:55:16 if you will be at Summit please sign up to give your demo 1-2 times. Repeating the demo from your talk is 100% OK, even desireable 16:56:43 jberkus: asking for the crowd 16:56:47 where can everyone sign up 16:56:56 should we make an issue to track? 16:56:57 * jbrooks has developed a late-to-this-meeting-condition 16:57:15 dustymabe, I will be at summit 16:57:33 dustymabe: on that google doc 16:57:41 the one I linked 16:57:48 ahh. darn. missed the link 16:58:02 jberkus: that link is RH only 16:58:04 jberkus: I'll be there.. 16:58:17 dustymabe: oh, good point 16:58:25 davdunc: really? Awesome! 16:58:38 davdunc: lemme PM you, I really want an AWS+atomic demo 16:58:50 yes. do! 16:58:58 I have credits this time jberkus 16:59:24 that's really cool davdunc 17:00:58 #info if you are going to be at RH Summit and want to do an Atomic/container demo, contact jberkus 17:01:01 davdunc: are you doing a session? 17:01:18 I have a BOF on hybrid cloud, but no session. 17:01:43 As always I'm coming from marketing to request your help with the Talking Points: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_28_talking_points 17:01:45 dustymabe: I'll make an issue as well. Unforutnately that spreadsheet has to be RH-only because I realized that we will have some demos related to not-yet-announced stuff 17:01:55 I get it. 17:02:00 jberkus: sure 17:02:12 #action jberkus to create issue related to RH Summit demos 17:02:57 x3mboy: i think we have an existing issue for the talking points that we were going to reuse...lemme find it 17:03:08 Cool! 17:03:12 miabbott, thanks a lot 17:03:19 #link https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/445 17:03:32 its the one we used for beta talking points, but most of it can be reused, i believe 17:03:36 Oh there is a question for me 17:03:42 Cool! I will work from there 17:03:46 Thanks again 17:03:49 excellent 17:04:02 I will have an issue in ~~ 3 min 17:04:18 over in #atomic, jdoss wanted to make sure we had visibility on the issue he filed about the F28 Beta AMIs 17:04:25 #link https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/456 17:05:07 May I go next? 17:05:28 oh sorry kushal, please go ahead 17:05:35 I am working on PoC to demonstrate how can we deploy SecureDrop (https://securedrop.org ) on a custom Fedora Atomic ostree. But, I will need help from community in testing+debugging. 17:05:44 The current productions are on Ubuntu. 17:06:09 17:06:17 cool! 17:06:34 kushal++ 17:06:34 lorbus: Karma for kushal changed to 1 (for the f27 release cycle): https://badges.fedoraproject.org/tags/cookie/any 17:06:36 very cool! 17:06:40 #info kushal working on PoC to demonstrate how can we deploy SecureDrop (https://securedrop.org ) on a custom Fedora Atomic ostree 17:07:08 i guess keep us updated kushal when you have something we can poke at 17:07:40 miabbott, yes, I am having trouble to ssh into the first build of the tree, I would love to have some help to debug that part :) 17:07:50 ah yes, i saw that in #atomic 17:07:52 We can talk about it after meeting. 17:08:26 cverna if you are still around, did you have any updates related to the container release changes? 17:08:34 issue for Summit demos: https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/458 17:09:17 miabbott: I am working on a plugin for atomic-reactor to automatically populate the container tags from a primary rpm 17:09:23 thanks jberkus 17:09:47 https://github.com/projectatomic/atomic-reactor/issues/963 17:09:55 #info cverna working on a plugin for atomic-reactor to automatically populate the container tags from a primary rpm 17:10:02 #link https://github.com/projectatomic/atomic-reactor/issues/963 17:10:11 But my main focus is to update OSBS so that we can generate flatpak 17:10:20 cverna: you had an action about creating tickets for the changes...have you done that yet? 17:10:33 or do you think it is still necessary? 17:10:34 no :( 17:10:49 you can close the action, I will do that now 17:11:17 hmm...i don't think there is an unaction command... 17:11:26 I wanted a ticket about dropping the /fxx/ in the registry path 17:12:03 ok then action done :) 17:12:11 i guess the action will remain and we can tick it off next meeting 17:12:25 thanks cverna 17:12:26 sounds good to me 17:12:41 anyone else have anything for open floor? 17:14:05 that's the end of the meeting, then 17:14:09 #endmeeting