20:00:47 #startmeeting Fedora Server SIG Weekly Meeting (2018-06-19) 20:00:47 Meeting started Tue Jun 19 20:00:47 2018 UTC. 20:00:47 This meeting is logged and archived in a public location. 20:00:47 The chair is sgallagh. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 20:00:47 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #halp #info #idea #link #topic. 20:00:47 The meeting name has been set to 'fedora_server_sig_weekly_meeting_(2018-06-19)' 20:00:47 #meetingname serversig 20:00:47 #topic Roll Call 20:00:47 The meeting name has been set to 'serversig' 20:00:54 .hello2 20:00:55 sgallagh: sgallagh 'Stephen Gallagher' 20:01:00 .hello2 20:01:01 mjwolf: mjwolf 'Michael Wolf' 20:01:08 morning 20:03:11 Not a lot of people around this week, which is fair because I didn't send an agenda. 20:03:29 is here 20:03:44 #topic Agenda 20:04:09 #info Agenda Item: Aging PRD and FreeIPA requirements 20:04:18 Anyone have another topic for this week? 20:04:45 I dont have any topics for this week 20:05:04 #topic Aging PRD and FreeIPA requirements 20:05:36 So, on the topic thread around new FreeIPA release criteria, it was pointed out that our criteria are all based around phrasing in the Server Edition PRD 20:05:56 Specifically around the concept of roles (and therefore by extension, implying a requirement of rolekit) 20:06:46 I think it's pretty clear that this document is out of date and no longer valid, so I'd like to raise a motion to annotate it as such and then deal with the requirements independent of it. 20:07:38 Proposal: Archive the current Server Edition PRD as a historical document and move our specific release criteria out of it and into the general Release Criteria wiki pages. 20:07:57 adamw, kparal: ping ^^ this is highly relevant to you 20:08:06 ab: you too 20:09:26 ... 20:09:33 seems fine. 20:09:37 seems fine 20:09:42 sync 20:10:39 I feel like the PRD right now is too far out of date to be served by a few updates and we have a perfectly good (and maintained) Release Criteria set that we could use instead. 20:11:12 I agree 20:11:28 I'm not sure we have sufficient representation to make this a binding decision in this meeting, so I'll move the proposal to the mailing list if those present agree with the general idea. 20:12:06 i can vote if you like.. if you think that would help.. but you probably should send to the ML anyway 20:12:14 * langdon was lurking 20:12:28 vote early, vote often 20:12:32 ha 20:12:38 im +1 for the record 20:12:38 langdon: Mostly I'm looking to see if anyone has a strong opposition to this approach 20:12:52 (And would by extension be volunteering to rewrite the PRD ...) 20:14:43 #info Those present generally agree with the proposal "Archive the current Server Edition PRD as a historical document and move our specific release criteria out of it and into the general Release Criteria wiki pages." but it will be sent to the mailing list for further discussion. 20:14:48 #topic Open Floor 20:14:53 Short meeting today? :) 20:15:13 guess so 20:16:21 OK, I'll close it out in two minutes if no one has anything else. 20:18:08 #endmeeting