15:00:00 #startmeeting FESCO (2018-07-09) 15:00:00 Meeting started Mon Jul 9 15:00:00 2018 UTC. 15:00:00 This meeting is logged and archived in a public location. 15:00:00 The chair is nirik. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 15:00:00 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #halp #info #idea #link #topic. 15:00:00 The meeting name has been set to 'fesco_(2018-07-09)' 15:00:01 #meetingname fesco 15:00:01 The meeting name has been set to 'fesco' 15:00:01 #chair nirik, maxamillion, jsmith, jwb, zbyszek, tyll, sgallagh, contyk, bowlofeggs 15:00:01 Current chairs: bowlofeggs contyk jsmith jwb maxamillion nirik sgallagh tyll zbyszek 15:00:02 #topic init process 15:00:18 morning everyone. Lets see if we have quorum today. ;) 15:00:29 .hello psabata 15:00:30 contyk: psabata 'Petr Šabata' 15:00:55 .hello kevin 15:00:57 nirik: kevin 'Kevin Fenzi' 15:01:08 .hello2 15:01:09 zbyszek: zbyszek 'Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek' 15:01:24 .hello2 15:01:25 bcotton: bcotton 'Ben Cotton' 15:03:10 hi 15:03:24 nirik, maxamillion, jsmith, tyll, sgallagh, contyk, bowlofeggs ? 15:03:39 well, thats 4... need one more. 15:03:40 .hello till 15:03:41 tyll: till 'Till Maas' 15:03:46 hurray. :) 15:03:50 welcome ;) 15:04:07 Hi there! 15:04:10 lets go ahead and get started... 15:04:13 #topic #1917 F29 System Wide Change: Make BootLoaderSpec-style 15:04:14 configuration files the default 15:04:14 .fesco 1917 15:04:14 https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/1917 15:04:16 nirik: Issue #1917: F29 System Wide Change: Make BootLoaderSpec-style configuration files the default - fesco - Pagure - https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/1917 15:04:16 o/ 15:05:01 There was a bit of discussion about this last week when we didn't have quorum... 15:05:11 The discussion has died down mostly on fedora-devel 15:05:49 I think there's general consensus that this is the right direction, even if some details might still change 15:05:52 I'm +1 to the change now. I think the discussion was mostly about unrelated things. 15:05:59 Yeah, +1 too 15:06:07 +1 here, too 15:06:31 the other issues can still be addresses separately afaiu 15:06:39 I'd like to see as much compatiblity with the systemd interpration of the spec, but the change process is not the venue for that 15:07:03 * nirik nods. 15:07:23 getting rid of grubby will be a nice win 15:07:31 FWIW, systemd now has boot counting (in a PR), so the next version of systemd, the one in F29, should be able to do fallback-to-previous-boot-entry 15:08:14 awesome 15:08:36 .hello2 15:08:36 maxamillion: maxamillion 'Adam Miller' 15:08:46 sorry, I was sitting in #fedora-meeting waiting for it to start 15:08:54 welcome maxamillion. 15:09:10 sorry. ;( anyhow, we are voting on/discussing the /topic item... 15:09:28 also, sorry for my absence in recent meetings ... my wife has been in and out of the hospital for the last three weeks (she's home and getting better now) 15:09:53 the log so far: https://meetbot-raw.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2018-07-09/fesco.2018-07-09-15.00.log.txt 15:09:53 hope she gets better soon 15:10:17 maxamillion: family comes first. :) Hope for a good recovery... 15:10:51 so, contyk, jwb, maxamillion: votes? or discussion items? 15:11:02 a little distracted +1 15:11:12 javier__: are you around to answer questions if anyone has any? 15:11:46 nirik: yes, I'm here 15:12:17 yeah, I'm +1 to the change ... was just reading a little 15:12:20 has this already landed in rawhide? 15:12:36 nirik: yes 15:12:55 * nirik makes a note to switch his laptop after the meeting. 15:13:18 nirik: if you're not online tomorrow, we'll know why :) 15:13:20 maxamillion: hope she gets well, soon 15:13:27 thank you 15:14:01 #agreed The Change is approved (+5,0,0) 15:14:08 #topic Next weeks chair 15:14:13 who wants it next week? 15:14:34 * zbyszek can do it, hasn't done it in a while 15:14:58 thanks! 15:15:07 thank you 15:15:08 #action zbyszek to chair next week 15:15:13 thanks zbyszek! 15:15:14 #topic Open Floor 15:15:20 Anyone have anything for open floor? 15:15:21 I'll take it the week after that because I've also not done it in a while 15:15:21 I have something 15:15:55 zbyszek: go ahead 15:16:04 * mhroncok too 15:16:08 So... as you might have seen, I filed a bunch of needinfos on the FTBFS-F28 tickets 15:16:25 I screwed up a bit because some of the people got 1, some 2, and some 3 notifications 15:16:32 But apart from that, I think it's OK 15:16:41 A bunch of bugs got handled today already 15:16:52 awesome. 15:17:02 Some packages were orphaned, a bunch were rebuilt, some very already building but my koji queries failed to find the builds 15:17:03 zbyszek++ 15:17:04 Thanks very much for doing that 15:17:06 tyll: Karma for zbyszek changed to 7 (for the f28 release cycle): https://badges.fedoraproject.org/tags/cookie/any 15:17:12 zbyszek++ 15:17:19 So I think the needinfo process is good enough for this 15:17:32 We'll need to send a separate mail before doing any orphaning of course 15:17:57 zbyszek: is there script for it published somewhere? 15:17:59 I hope we can get the whole process working smoothly, because right now there's so many rough edges 15:17:59 no objection here. 15:18:13 zbyszek: I've set my blocked bug to assigned to avoid the orphanning, but shoudl the policy cover this? i.e. the bug is blocked by another bug? 15:18:18 Sorry for being late -- jet-lag got the best of me 15:18:40 tyll: https://pagure.io/ftbfs/blob/master/f/ftbfs.py 15:19:00 So I had one issue I wanted to at least note... 15:19:05 mhroncok: Yeah, I think setting it ASSIGNED is good enough in this case 15:19:10 ok 15:19:29 mhroncok: it's just a marker that the issue is being handled in this case 15:19:45 nirik go ahead, I think that's all from my side 15:19:58 The mass rebuild is 2018-07-11 (in two days) and there's some grumbling on the devel list about anonobin. Should we reach out to maintainers and make sure it's ready for mass rebuild? 15:20:16 Definitely 15:20:27 nirik: it got fixed today 15:20:27 It seems that starting the rebuild with annobin broken doesn't make much sense 15:20:32 Ah, OK. 15:20:48 let me comment ont he releng issue 15:20:49 mhroncok: great! 15:21:55 I don't know of anything else off hand thats blocking the mass rebuild... 15:22:47 ok, if nothing else will close out in a minute and give people some time back. ;) 15:22:53 I have something 15:23:00 1) python 3.7, just info 15:23:01 oh, ok, go ahead 15:23:15 #info Python 3.7: 106 FTBFS, 63 blocked, 149 broken deps (not all packages that BR python3 require it) 15:23:26 * mhroncok cannot do #infos I guess 15:23:41 2) is about comps 15:23:45 #info Python 3.7: 106 FTBFS, 63 blocked, 149 broken deps (not all packages that BR python3 require it) 15:24:00 #info annobin issue that was causing build failures in rawhide koji is resolved, https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1598961#c5 15:24:05 who "maintains" comps, who has teh power to decde? 15:24:13 #chair mhroncok 15:24:13 Current chairs: bowlofeggs contyk jsmith jwb maxamillion mhroncok nirik sgallagh tyll zbyszek 15:24:36 mhroncok: I think any fedora maintainer can change comps 15:24:37 mhroncok: it's a collective type package. Usually big changes are discussed on the devel list. 15:24:42 I'd liek to see https://pagure.io/fedora-comps/issue/291 fixed for F29, but I'm not sure whether it requires change proposal, or not 15:25:00 I can post an e-mail to devel 15:25:15 https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_use_and_edit_comps.xml_for_package_groups 15:25:36 mhroncok: My best guess is that yes, that should go through the Change proposal process, as it sounds substantial 15:26:11 jsmith: +1 15:26:15 will do 15:26:29 +1 for change process 15:26:32 mhroncok: Thanks :-) 15:26:40 I hope it will classify as self contained 15:26:41 changes never hurt :) 15:26:43 yeah. Would we allow a late change for f29 for this? 15:26:58 as it only changes the comps :D 15:27:09 oh, self contained deadline is the 24th. ;) 15:27:13 exactly 15:27:20 great 15:27:21 that's why I hope for that :D 15:27:45 ok, thank you 15:28:08 thanks mhroncok 15:28:18 anything else? 15:28:30 o/ 15:28:48 I wonder, do you have a good workflow to find issues you still need to vote on? 15:29:08 do you just click through all open issues and check? 15:29:09 not really, I was wondering if we should tag them somehow. 15:29:09 tyll: I gave up and just open all of them in tabs and go on-by-one ;( 15:29:31 tags sound like a good idea 15:29:33 like 'voting open' and remove that when it's decided 15:30:27 iirc sgallagh proposed to use "notification pending" when it is done, however, I was also wondering about finding issues that I did not yet vote on 15:31:24 but I guess there is no nice solution, just wanted to make sure that there is not a tampermonkey script or so to help here 15:31:44 yeah, will have to ponder on the best workflow here. 15:32:11 ok, thanks everyone for coming! 15:32:15 #endmeeting