#fedora-meeting-1: Prioritized bugs and issues

Meeting started by bcotton at 14:01:34 UTC (full logs).

Meeting summary

  1. Purpose of this meeting (bcotton, 14:01:49)
    1. The purpose of this process is to help with processing backlog of bugs and issues found during the development, verification and use of Fedora distribution. (bcotton, 14:02:00)
    2. The main goal is to raise visibility of bugs and issues to help contributors focus on the most important issues. (bcotton, 14:02:01)
    3. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Program_Management/Prioritized_bugs_and_issues_-_the_process (bcotton, 14:02:02)

  2. Roll call (bcotton, 14:02:07)
  3. Nominated bugs (bcotton, 14:07:50)
    1. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/buglist.cgi?bug_status=NEW&bug_status=ASSIGNED&bug_status=POST&bug_status=MODIFIED&bug_status=ON_DEV&bug_status=ON_QA&bug_status=VERIFIED&bug_status=RELEASE_PENDING&classification=Fedora&keywords=Triaged&keywords_type=nowords&list_id=9195844&product=Fedora&query_format=advanced&status_whiteboard=PrioritizedBug&status_whiteboard_type=allwords (bcotton, 14:07:51)
    2. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1026119 (bcotton, 14:07:57)
    3. this bug was originally filed in 2013 (bcotton, 14:08:35)
    4. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1563674 (bcotton, 14:12:01)
    5. this one is NEEDINFO for almost 2 months (bcotton, 14:12:27)
    6. BZ includes a candidate patch to fix the issue (bcotton, 14:13:09)
    7. ACTION: bcotton to nudge owner about the proposed patch (bcotton, 14:13:31)
    8. AGREED: accepted as a PrioritizedBug (bcotton, 14:15:42)
    9. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1575281 (bcotton, 14:16:40)
    10. this bug was originally reported in 2014 (bcotton, 14:17:23)
    11. AGREED: 1098749 rejected as a PrioritizedBug (bcotton, 14:23:56)
    12. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1575281 (bcotton, 14:24:24)
    13. AGREED: 1575281 is deferred pending input from the Workstation team (bcotton, 14:31:21)
    14. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1573873 (bcotton, 14:32:09)
    15. this bug was rejected as a blocker for F29: ""As things stand, nothing is broken for F29 Beta. There is no blocker bug here. If the 10-bit support is reintroduced in Mesa without affected applications being fixed, we will revisit this." (bcotton, 14:34:04)
    16. AGREED: bug 1573873 is rejected as a PrioritizedBug (bcotton, 14:37:23)
    17. ACTION: bcotton to ask Christian to retest on a fresh F28 install (bcotton, 14:44:38)

  4. Accepted bugs (bcotton, 14:46:10)
    1. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/buglist.cgi?bug_status=NEW&bug_status=ASSIGNED&bug_status=POST&bug_status=MODIFIED&bug_status=ON_DEV&bug_status=ON_QA&bug_status=VERIFIED&bug_status=RELEASE_PENDING&classification=Fedora&keywords=Triaged&keywords_type=allwords&list_id=9195442&product=Fedora&query_format=advanced&status_whiteboard=PrioritizedBug&status_whiteboard_type=allwords (bcotton, 14:46:11)
    2. ACTION: bcotton to follow up with owners of existing PrioritizedBugs (bcotton, 14:51:04)


Meeting ended at 14:55:24 UTC (full logs).

Action items

  1. bcotton to nudge owner about the proposed patch
  2. bcotton to ask Christian to retest on a fresh F28 install
  3. bcotton to follow up with owners of existing PrioritizedBugs


Action items, by person

  1. bcotton
    1. bcotton to nudge owner about the proposed patch
    2. bcotton to ask Christian to retest on a fresh F28 install
    3. bcotton to follow up with owners of existing PrioritizedBugs


People present (lines said)

  1. bcotton (70)
  2. mattdm (28)
  3. jsmith (13)
  4. zodbot (6)
  5. mclasen (3)


Generated by MeetBot 0.1.4.