16:00:13 #startmeeting fpc 16:00:14 Meeting started Thu Oct 18 16:00:13 2018 UTC. 16:00:14 This meeting is logged and archived in a public location. 16:00:14 The chair is geppetto. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 16:00:14 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #halp #info #idea #link #topic. 16:00:14 The meeting name has been set to 'fpc' 16:00:14 #meetingname fpc 16:00:14 #topic Roll Call 16:00:14 The meeting name has been set to 'fpc' 16:00:21 hey 16:00:27 #chair mhroncok 16:00:27 Current chairs: geppetto mhroncok 16:00:31 #chair ignatenkobrain 16:00:31 Current chairs: geppetto ignatenkobrain mhroncok 16:01:11 hi everybody 16:01:17 #chair decathorpe 16:01:17 Current chairs: decathorpe geppetto ignatenkobrain mhroncok 16:03:20 Hey, folks 16:03:33 I'm in a physical meeting right now as well. 16:03:44 #chair tibbs 16:03:44 Current chairs: decathorpe geppetto ignatenkobrain mhroncok tibbs 16:03:46 * geppetto nods 16:04:14 As I said in f-d … not much on the schedule anyway 16:04:53 hello - sorry I'm late 16:05:03 #chair redi 16:05:03 Current chairs: decathorpe geppetto ignatenkobrain mhroncok redi tibbs 16:05:05 no problem 16:05:11 I have something quick - what is this page https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Committee/ja ? 16:05:41 if it's just junk, should it be removed, or at least removed from the FPC category? 16:06:16 .hello2 16:06:17 ignatenkobrain: ignatenkobrain 'Igor Gnatenko' 16:06:36 https://fedoraproject.org/w/index.php?title=Packaging/Committee/ja&action=history 16:06:42 There have been sporadic attempts to translte various pages. 16:06:49 looks like somebody wanted to make a japanese version and gave up 16:06:51 oh it's a translation 16:07:20 (a very incomplete one) 16:07:34 redi: Looks like an old copy of https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging_Committee … maybe someone accidentally typed into the titlebar on save or something? 16:07:45 ahh 16:07:52 gepetto: that's what I thought at first too 16:08:08 should we remove it then? it's not been kept in sync with the proper one, and isn't in Japanese anyway 16:08:34 I'de remove it 16:08:44 it would be fairly harmless, but it's listed under https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Category:Packaging_committee 16:08:47 yep 16:08:58 ok I'll nuke it 16:09:04 Agreed. 16:09:08 #topic Schedule 16:09:10 https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/packaging@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/TCDBEO25XN5P3EX66REKMSWC3DPBP47H/ 16:09:50 Any updates on 719? 16:10:05 It's progressing. 16:10:10 #topic #719 Simplify packaging of forge-hosted projects 16:10:14 * geppetto nods 16:10:17 Fair enough 16:10:19 Some stuff has been merged, more is on the way. 16:10:34 ignatenkobrain and I need to look at the latest PR. 16:10:54 a new version of the macros landed in rawhide, and broke 20 of my packages :D 16:11:29 He said it would ned coordination, 16:12:00 But that cordination is with some other mcro packge that I don;t see, so I had assumed the coordination was happening. 16:12:02 decathorpe: was that a golang heavy change … or were a bunch of people affected? 16:12:21 yeah, but that coordination didn't work out, since AFAICT the changes to redhat-rpm-config were pushed to rawhide accidentally with an unrelated change. 16:12:26 I elieve it was just go. 16:12:48 no. it was forge macros in general, but not many packages used the %tag macro anyway 16:13:41 looks like I don't have privs to delete pages from the wiki, I can't see any "delete" option anywhere 16:13:59 redi: AFAIK you need to replace the text with empty 16:14:06 ok 16:14:30 from looking at the changes and from what nim said about it, it affects packages which use %tag where the tag starts with a "v", as is the case for many golang packages (e.g. "v1.0.0") 16:14:34 #topic Open Floor 16:15:15 did somebody have time to look at my first draft of a reworked RPMMacros page? 16:15:32 I can delete the page if it really needs to get deleted. 16:15:48 I can look at it once this terrible meeting is done. 16:16:24 decathorpe: I don't think so … you have a link? 16:16:35 decathorpe: I've read the render 16:16:35 decathorpe: not the diff 16:16:35 decathorpe: and the content looks resonable to me 16:16:35 I ahven't verieief all listed macros 16:16:55 just a sec 16:17:13 Yes, I did a quick look and it's certainly better. 16:17:24 diff: https://pagure.io/fork/decathorpe/packaging-committee/c/b744d9c29899006f2dc32c10eba5731a7276a323?branch=rpmmacros 16:17:36 render (not antora): https://decathorpe.fedorapeople.org/Packaging:RPMMacros 16:19:06 decathorpe: looks good 16:19:41 looks great 16:19:44 I didn't really know where to start, but I wanted to at least make it more useful than the current version ... 16:20:42 decathorpe: you did well ;) 16:20:55 much better explanations 16:21:34 digging through /usr/lib/rpm/macros, /usr/lib/rpm/platform/, and /usr/lib/rpm/macros.d/* was fun ... 16:26:43 tiem to end? 16:26:45 *time 16:27:06 I guess so 16:28:34 Yeh 16:28:38 ok 16:28:46 #endmeeting