16:00:08 #startmeeting fpc 16:00:08 Meeting started Thu Apr 25 16:00:08 2019 UTC. 16:00:08 This meeting is logged and archived in a public location. 16:00:08 The chair is geppetto. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 16:00:08 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #halp #info #idea #link #topic. 16:00:08 The meeting name has been set to 'fpc' 16:00:09 #meetingname fpc 16:00:09 #topic Roll Call 16:00:09 The meeting name has been set to 'fpc' 16:00:15 * limburgher here 16:00:22 #chair limburgher 16:00:22 Current chairs: geppetto limburgher 16:00:51 .hello2 16:00:56 ignatenkobrain: ignatenkobrain 'Igor Gnatenko' 16:01:06 #chair ignatenkobrain 16:01:06 Current chairs: geppetto ignatenkobrain limburgher 16:01:08 Hey. 16:01:10 hey. I am around, but I will not be available the entire time 16:01:13 #chair mhroncok 16:01:13 Current chairs: geppetto ignatenkobrain limburgher mhroncok 16:01:14 I'm attending Rust Meetup in Brno, So I can be slow with answers 16:01:27 I'm at home with the flu and likely to be mostly useless. 16:01:37 Ok, no new tickets this week anyway … so hopefully can make it short for you guys 16:01:40 #chair tibbs 16:01:40 Current chairs: geppetto ignatenkobrain limburgher mhroncok tibbs 16:02:54 I didnt have much time to look at Go stuff, but I did merge some parts for redhat-rpm-confog 16:03:04 cool 16:04:08 #topic Schedule 16:04:11 #link https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/packaging@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/KWKGHR54D4JW23VDL76G6VKQELUQ4EQ3/ 16:04:51 #topic #382 Go Packaging Guidelines Draft 16:04:55 .fpc 382 16:04:57 geppetto: Issue #382: Go Packaging Guidelines Draft - packaging-committee - Pagure.io - https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/issue/382 16:04:59 hi 16:05:08 sorry I'm late, was on another call 16:05:25 I'm here if you have any questions regarding the draft 16:05:27 #chair redi 16:05:27 Current chairs: geppetto ignatenkobrain limburgher mhroncok redi tibbs 16:05:35 eclipseo: thanks 16:05:57 So the last comment is eclipseo saying he thinks he's addressed all the comments made in the last meeting. 16:06:06 .hello decathorpe 16:06:07 decathorpe: decathorpe 'None' 16:06:12 #chair decathorpe 16:06:12 Current chairs: decathorpe geppetto ignatenkobrain limburgher mhroncok redi tibbs 16:06:14 still drunk ... 16:06:16 Just in time :) 16:06:27 hi, I'm None 16:07:52 decathorpe: at least you exist 16:08:33 I think the draft is up to date with our comments? 16:10:47 decathorpe: that's what eclipseo is suggesting 16:11:04 I'm not 100% sure … is there an easy way to see diffs etc.? 16:11:32 I squashed everything for the PR 16:11:56 the changes are regarding the generated buildrguires 16:12:02 buildrequires 16:12:08 to match the latest dev 16:12:18 is that live yet? 16:12:53 plus adressing some of the comments made diring the last meeting, for ex removing "if you're lucky" by a more descriptive wording 16:13:37 decathorpe: it's in progress, but the current code in the macros is planned to support it 16:14:46 so IIUC, RPM in fedora doesn't support it yet? 16:16:27 no, the bug is here: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/593 16:17:33 then I'd switch it around in the guidelines until it becomes available (i.e. make "manual" the default, and mention that automatic generation is being worked on) 16:19:43 In the current draft, I already add a condition "If automatic buildrequires are available in your platform" I think it's clear enough. I explain how to get the alternative, as in how to get the BR manually 16:20:18 I see that, but since there's no platform that supports it yet ... well, I think you get my point 16:25:32 Ok, anyone have any more comments … we have enough bandwith to vote on it or do we need to leave it for another week when a bunch of us have more time? 16:27:12 we can vote, if you want. I think the draft looks pretty good 16:27:40 decathorpe: I've switched the declarations about BR, automatic comes second now. 16:28:16 great, thanks! 16:28:28 decathorpe: it is not even in a upstream... But I'm working on it 16:30:16 so, should we vote? 16:30:39 decathorpe: We can … 16:30:49 I would prefer to take closer look 16:30:58 Proposal: Current draft, after automatic => manual default change. 16:31:01 +1 16:31:03 Since I didn't have much time to do so 16:31:59 ignatenkobrian: you can vote in the ticket after you've looked at it? 16:32:19 I'm +1, looks good, and I've been using most of it for my own packages already 16:32:43 I am OK either way 16:33:05 but ignatenkobrain promised to post inline comments. I think we can wait one extra week 16:34:19 * decathorpe shrugs 16:36:30 +1 16:37:53 #info mhroncok Wants to wait until ignatenkobrain comments. 16:38:13 #info Go Packaging Buidelines (+1:3, 0:1, -1:0) 16:38:22 #topic Open Floor 16:38:41 Anyone have anything else to talk about? 16:39:03 eclipseo: With luck we should talk about it next week, and get it passed :) 16:40:21 this might be off-topic, but what should I do when the email of the main admin for a package bounces? 16:40:37 start nonresponsive maintainer process? 16:41:36 Yeh, I think so 16:41:52 Maybe ask in fedora-devel if anyone knows how to contact them? 16:42:02 yeah, those were my thoughts too 16:42:26 working on the stewardship SIG packages gets you into the dark and dusty corners of fedora pretty quickly 16:45:35 I guess I'm +1 on the Go guidelines. gotta run now though 16:57:25 is the meeting still on? 16:57:53 maybe :D 16:58:14 is there a agenda for this meeting? 16:58:27 ish. 17:00:12 end meeting? 17:00:24 geppetto: can you #endmeeting please? 17:00:34 #endmeeting