15:01:13 #startmeeting Stewardship SIG Meeting (2019-06-11) 15:01:13 Meeting started Tue Jun 11 15:01:13 2019 UTC. 15:01:13 This meeting is logged and archived in a public location. 15:01:13 The chair is decathorpe. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 15:01:13 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #halp #info #idea #link #topic. 15:01:13 The meeting name has been set to 'stewardship_sig_meeting_(2019-06-11)' 15:01:22 #meetingname stewardship-sig 15:01:22 The meeting name has been set to 'stewardship-sig' 15:01:29 #topic Roll Call 15:05:22 decathorpe: hey 15:09:50 * jstanek also lurks here for the stewardship mtg 15:11:02 whoops, sorry 15:11:09 #chair mhroncok 15:11:09 Current chairs: decathorpe mhroncok 15:11:18 #chair jstanek 15:11:18 Current chairs: decathorpe jstanek mhroncok 15:11:55 alright, let's start 15:12:08 anything important you guys want to open with? 15:13:06 I have nothing; I'm mostly here in order to know what is going on 15:14:20 #topic Open Floor 15:14:45 I know that mhroncok and I have been working on some pull requests (some fixes and some minor version updates) 15:15:05 it would be great if we could get a second opinion on these 15:15:50 #link https://www.pagure.io/stewardship-sig/blob/master/f/PENDING_UPDATES.md 15:16:05 see the "Good updates with PR"s section 15:18:00 decathorpe: well, they look like Java; I can review them only from packaging perspective, since I do not know any Java 15:18:47 that should be enough. I did test rebuilds of dependent packages, they are linked in the pull requests 15:19:13 ok, I will try to take a look at them tomorrow 15:19:43 jstanek++ 15:19:44 mhroncok: Karma for jstanek changed to 1 (for the current release cycle): https://badges.fedoraproject.org/tags/cookie/any 15:20:24 great :) 15:20:45 I've been trying to get things into better shape 15:21:06 so I started with minor version updates, and am working my way upwards ;) 15:21:40 decathorpe: I won't have time to help this effort, I'm burried undeer python 3.8 problems 15:21:55 decathorpe: but I can have a look in august :D 15:25:34 decathorpe_: still with us? 15:26:15 argh. sorry for the disconnects. university WiFi doesn't like me today 15:27:29 decathorpe: can we discuss log4j? 15:27:33 mhroncok: I'll wait with requesting the new jboss orphan packages until we reve merged your log4j PR, it should cut down the number of things wee need 15:27:42 I'll look at your PR when I'm home 15:28:01 it actually could reduce the number of thing we maintain significantly 15:28:14 that would be great, yeah 15:28:57 we could also consider dropping the JPA backend, it would reduce things further and fix installability issues on 32bit 15:28:59 actually, 32 sig ackages have bconds 15:29:11 we should probably go trough them and maybe minimize some packages 15:29:38 yeah, that's probably worthwhile 15:34:56 decathorpe: I'll open a ticket 15:42:39 by the way, I also plan on reducing our package set soon - via unresponsive maintainer / long term FTI/FTBFS processes ;) 15:42:50 decathorpe: for depndent packages? 15:43:07 yes 15:43:17 some are hilariously broken 15:43:28 or not built since f21 or something 15:44:11 decathorpe: and why do we care for them? 15:44:31 decathorpe: we generally drop SIG leaves, right? 15:44:51 so I don't really undertand how this helps, do you have an example? 15:44:58 it helps my conscience ;) 15:45:26 and yes, the SIG leaf package removal is the primary way to do it 15:46:19 once the script has finished generating the correct / complete report, I will resume that procedure 15:48:25 decathorpe: thanks 15:49:49 once the results are correct, I'll work on making the script faster ... right now it runs for half a day :( 15:51:50 decathorpe: the orphaned packages looking for miantainers runs for 5 hours 15:52:12 that's bad too :D 15:54:43 alright. let's close this meeting. thanks for showing up! 15:54:45 #endmeeting