15:00:39 #startmeeting Stewardship SIG Meeting (2019-07-09) 15:00:39 Meeting started Tue Jul 9 15:00:39 2019 UTC. 15:00:39 This meeting is logged and archived in a public location. 15:00:39 The chair is decathorpe. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 15:00:39 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #halp #info #idea #link #topic. 15:00:39 The meeting name has been set to 'stewardship_sig_meeting_(2019-07-09)' 15:00:46 #meetingname stewardship-sig 15:00:46 The meeting name has been set to 'stewardship-sig' 15:00:56 #topic Roll Call 15:00:59 hi guys :) 15:02:26 hello 15:03:05 #chair jstanek 15:03:05 Current chairs: decathorpe jstanek 15:05:51 okay, let's start ... 15:06:02 #link Agenda https://www.pagure.io/stewardship-sig/issue/36 15:06:19 #topic Open Floor 15:06:29 is there anything specific you want to talk about? 15:09:16 I have noticed new round of PRs ready for review; although I would still prefer a Java person to review them (they all seem to be Java related), I cat take look at them if no-one else volunteers. 15:09:56 right 15:10:14 some changes are more-or-less direct ports from the modular branches, so these should be fine 15:11:03 ok, I will take a look at the module branch where possible 15:11:12 thanks 15:11:34 well, and for all PRs I posted, I did successful rebuilds of dependent packages. that's something at least 15:12:07 I can post links to the relevant modular changes as comments on the PRs if that helps 15:13:40 decathorpe: Please do, it will save me some time 15:13:50 I'm on it 15:14:41 If it turns out that the links are easy to construct/deduce from the non-modular package, we can skip this next time 15:15:32 jstanek: it depends on where the changes come from - this stream branch or that, or from mbi forks 15:16:52 decathorpe: In that case, link away – this kind of code archaelogy is not particularly enjoyable 😁 15:17:11 jstanek: yeah. it really is not 😂️ 15:18:52 by the way, the only PR that's a bit more important is one that I haven't submitted yet, for xbean - it will fix build / installability issues on 32bit arches. the test rebuilds are still running though 15:22:31 I will probably get to it by the end of this week (or the beginning of the next one), so if you manage to submit it and add it to the list before that, I will take a look too; otherwise just remind me on next meeting 15:22:55 decathorpe: BTW if on of gil's packages really blocks thing, we can take them and retire them right away 15:24:46 mhroncok: yeah, I'll come back to that if anything urgent happens 15:24:56 #chair mhroncok 15:24:56 Current chairs: decathorpe jstanek mhroncok 15:36:28 jstanek: I've posted links on all PRs that have upstream or module branch equivalents 15:36:55 decathorpe: I'm seeing the notification e-mails; thanks 15:36:58 decathorpe++ 15:36:58 jstanek: Karma for decathorpe changed to 3 (for the current release cycle): https://badges.fedoraproject.org/tags/cookie/any 15:37:49 👍️ thanks for looking at them 15:38:07 well, I think there's nothing else to discuss, unless you have something 15:38:17 * jstanek has nothing 15:38:48 great, then thanks for showing up 👍️ 15:38:50 #endmeeting