14:00:26 #startmeeting Council (2019-10-02) 14:00:26 Meeting started Wed Oct 2 14:00:26 2019 UTC. 14:00:26 This meeting is logged and archived in a public location. 14:00:26 The chair is bcotton. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 14:00:26 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #halp #info #idea #link #topic. 14:00:26 The meeting name has been set to 'council_(2019-10-02)' 14:00:27 #meetingname council 14:00:27 The meeting name has been set to 'council' 14:00:36 #chair jonatoni bexelbie contyk dgilmore dperpeet langdon mattdm sumantrom tyll bcotton pbrobinson asamalik 14:00:36 Current chairs: asamalik bcotton bexelbie contyk dgilmore dperpeet jonatoni langdon mattdm pbrobinson sumantrom tyll 14:00:37 #topic Introductions, Welcomes 14:00:50 .hello2 14:00:51 asamalik: asamalik 'Adam Samalik' 14:00:57 i know mattdm and bexelbie are out for training or something, but who *is* here? 14:01:00 hi asamalik 14:01:06 hi bcotton 14:01:20 * pbrobinson o/ 14:01:26 ahoj, pbrobinson! 14:01:39 hi bcotton 14:02:02 こんにちわ pbrobinson 14:02:40 asamalik: no idea what that means 14:02:47 .hello2 14:02:48 langdon: langdon 'Langdon White' 14:03:21 pbrobinson: I believe it means hello in Japanese, since we're greeting each other in various languages 14:03:44 * asamalik wonders what language langdon is going to choose 14:04:14 asamalik: "believe" :-P 14:04:17 hi langdon! 14:04:27 yo 14:04:29 aloha 14:04:31 shalom 14:05:21 contyk dgilmore dperpeet jonatoni sumantro tyll? 14:05:48 contyk is in meetings 14:05:54 not allowed 14:05:57 #topic Today's agenda 14:05:58 1. #267—Planning Hackfest 2019 14:05:59 2. #274—Next phase of minimization objective 14:06:03 3. #254—Close out current modularity objective. Consider and potentially approve next phase. 14:06:04 4. #272—Websites team needs revitalizing 14:06:06 5. Open floor 14:06:16 #topic Planning Hackfest 2019 14:06:17 #link https://pagure.io/Fedora-Council/tickets/issue/267 14:06:19 #info 18-20 Nov in Prague 14:06:21 #action members to reply to bex's email if they haven't already 14:06:38 so bex conveniently did not provide me a way of knowing who had replied when he asked me to help make sure people reply quickly 14:06:46 so everyone reply if you haven't 14:06:54 * asamalik did! 14:06:57 #action mattdm to develop a draft schedule 14:07:00 asamalik++ 14:07:04 me too 14:07:08 langdon++ 14:07:18 ooo is zod back? 14:07:24 someone broke the mirror? 14:07:28 langdon: zod loves me better than you 14:07:33 apparently 14:07:49 #topic Next phase of Minimization Objective 14:07:50 #link https://pagure.io/Fedora-Council/tickets/issue/274 14:07:57 asamalik: the floor is yours 14:08:18 bcotton: thank you! 14:08:27 #link https://asamalik.fedorapeople.org/fedora-minimization-logic-model.pdf 14:08:47 I have put together a logic model to help me explain the plans 14:09:02 I'm yet to write down the specific proposal 14:09:27 but the primary focus will be on use cases 14:09:45 by use cases I basically mean "groups of packages in specific context" 14:10:17 wait.. where on the use cases? 14:10:47 s/on/are 14:10:50 oops 14:11:38 by focusing on use cases as opposed to individual packages — because that's hard to approach 14:12:04 there are conflicting requirements on individual packages, because they can be often used in many different ways 14:12:23 that sounds familiar! 14:12:26 langdon: some of them are here: https://minimization.github.io/reports/view--use-cases-on-bases.html 14:12:52 asamalik: but they aren't in the logic model, right? thats why i am confused ... cause I read it as they are in there (somehow) 14:13:21 langdon: that's correct 14:13:52 the goal for the next phase will be more building the capability to define and track use cases rather than minimizing them 14:14:27 and to monitor them for size changes 14:14:57 can i propose that you team that up with adamW and think about using use cases as "acceptance criteria for release" as well? 14:15:07 and to potentially be able to potentially get bugs automatically reported to packages that introduce significant size increases to the use cases we care about 14:15:08 like if we cna make the format work for both, thta might be handy 14:15:49 so basically focusing on *keeping* things small and being able to express what and how we want to focus on 14:15:50 hi all 14:16:08 langdon: I talked exactly about this with bcotton a while ago! 14:16:19 having the use cases defined, we can test them as use cases in CI 14:16:23 BDD FTW! 14:16:33 ...we can somehow use that for the project to define priorities 14:16:50 but that's a wider topic and I'll have that prepared for the hackfest 14:17:16 hackfest? 14:17:24 anyway, a proper proposal is coming and will be ready by I believe next Friday 14:17:53 langdon: the council hackfest... sorry I need to formulate that better probably for it to make sense 14:18:20 soryr.. i should have guessed ... but wondered if you were having one for minimization 14:19:57 bcotton: that's all from my side at this moment 14:20:09 #action asamalik to draft a proposal for the next phase by 11 October 14:20:17 awesome. any more questions, langdon? 14:20:46 no... im good... 14:21:23 asamalik: defining small is hard. 14:21:25 good, then it's your turn... 14:21:35 #topic Close out current modularity objective. Consider and potentially approve next phase. 14:21:36 #link https://pagure.io/Fedora-Council/tickets/issue/254 14:21:37 #link https://pagure.io/Fedora-Council/council-docs/pull-request/61 14:21:39 #info Community comment period ends on Friday 14:21:51 dgilmore: and keeping it useful at the same time, for everyone, is also tricky :) 14:21:55 \o/ 14:22:06 langdon: have you been editing based on community feedback or will you do that at the end? 14:22:56 bcotton: mostly due to conflicts, i have not.. there was meant to be some discussion of the feedback at last week's meetgin but I haven't followed up on it.. .ill probably update it before the end though 14:23:03 okay, cool 14:24:16 anything else on this? 14:24:55 #topic Websites team needs revitalizing 14:24:56 #link https://pagure.io/Fedora-Council/tickets/issue/275 14:25:07 since mattdm isn't here, i'm not sure there's much to say 14:25:16 but uh, yeah. we need webz 14:26:04 webz++ 14:26:22 #topic Next meeting 14:26:23 #info The next Fedora Council meeting is 16 October 14:26:29 #action mattdm to chair the 16 October meeting 14:26:40 #topic Open floor 14:26:55 anything else we want to talk about this week? 14:27:19 do we have an eta on the hackfest agenda? 14:28:28 have you met matthew? ;-) 14:28:40 bcotton: i have met *you*!! :) 14:28:56 langdon: when would you like to have it? 14:29:17 me? morning of the event... but im pretty seat of the pants :) 14:29:38 let's say, it woul dbe reasonable to have it before the meeting after next 14:30:02 okay, i'll push to have it by 30 October 14:30:10 we can always throw it away, after all :-D 14:30:19 like the best made plans 14:30:30 also, do we have any progress on more cake? aka new fcaic? 14:30:56 #agreed We would like a draft agenda for the Council Hackfest by the 30 October meeting 14:31:43 the FCAIC 3.0 process is underway. that's about all i can say at this point. it is not progressing as quickly as some had perhaps hoped 14:32:09 hiring is normally sooooo easy! 14:32:48 right? 14:33:49 okay, last call! 14:34:08 * tachoknight raises his hand 14:35:06 i mentioned it in the flock channel, but was wondering who/when/where Flock locations are discussed; had a proposal for 2020 14:35:49 welcome, tachoknight! 14:36:18 thank you 14:36:19 last year, the council agreed to let Red Hat's community events team do site selection and management, since that's their area of expertise 14:36:49 so Flock 2020 will be North America somewhere, but the where is not yet set 14:36:56 ah, okay, then i'll throw the proposal their way (Chicago for 2020 is my suggestion) 14:37:21 I think that was one of the cities on the list. I'm 2.5 hours away, so I'm in favor of it :p 14:37:31 im pretty sure as well.. 14:37:51 tachoknight: would you be willing to be on the ground support? and when you say "chicago" where do you actually mean? 14:38:10 cause I don't think the south loop is gonna happen 14:38:15 yes, i would be happy to provide ground support, and i mean actual downtown Chicago 14:38:25 langdon: does Gary count? 14:38:26 in August 14:38:30 or near O'Hare i suppose 14:38:36 tachoknight: that seems like 20x the normal price of flock :) 14:39:12 when i heard chicago mentioned i thought i heard "near subrubs" .. aurora for example 14:39:13 hmm, i figured Flock was always in ritzy places, cost was no problem ;) 14:39:20 right? 14:39:39 * bcotton is still holding out for charting a cruise ship 14:39:43 well, i'd be happy to work with the RH folks 14:39:51 well we can do downtown Chicago in August if we get a place without air conditioning 14:40:00 smooge++ 14:40:13 hmm, my apartment is too small for everyone, sadly 14:40:18 * tachoknight doesn't have air conditioning 14:40:36 that won't be cool 14:40:36 that will be in our price range though we may need to throw in near a place where they are digging up the old bone yards 14:40:47 #action bcotton to follow up with events team on Flock 2020 site selection 14:41:38 * tachoknight sits down and resumes listening 14:41:49 tachoknight++ for coming and proving suggestions 14:41:49 bcotton: Karma for tachoknight changed to 1 (for the current release cycle): https://badges.fedoraproject.org/tags/cookie/any 14:41:54 anything else for this week? 14:42:03 my brother's place is pretty big.. we could just get like 5 people to donate places and have a talk in each.. use the l to get between talks 14:42:04 * asamalik has nothing more 14:42:43 I was at a conference where one of the "rooms" was actually a boat! 14:43:16 * langdon thinks all the rooms should be boats.. 14:43:18 okay, thanks everyone! 14:43:21 #endmeeting