17:00:11 #startmeeting fpc 17:00:11 Meeting started Thu Nov 14 17:00:11 2019 UTC. 17:00:11 This meeting is logged and archived in a public location. 17:00:11 The chair is geppetto. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 17:00:11 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #halp #info #idea #link #topic. 17:00:11 The meeting name has been set to 'fpc' 17:00:11 #meetingname fpc 17:00:11 #topic Roll Call 17:00:11 The meeting name has been set to 'fpc' 17:00:29 * decathorpe is here 17:00:30 #chair decathorpe 17:00:30 Current chairs: decathorpe geppetto 17:00:31 hey 17:00:43 good morning / evening :) 17:00:58 * limburgher is here 17:01:03 #chair limburgher 17:01:03 Current chairs: decathorpe geppetto limburgher 17:01:14 But I have to go in 15. 17:01:27 could be a short meeting then :) 17:01:45 the only real new thing is I put the fonts policy rewrite on the agenda 17:01:48 o/ 17:01:54 #chair mhroncok 17:01:54 Current chairs: decathorpe geppetto limburgher mhroncok 17:02:04 Ineed 17:02:12 d--^ 17:02:14 But that was mainly so everyone took a look at it, I don't expect us to vote it in today 17:05:30 geppetto, it should be good and mature, given it took 2 years to write 17:06:02 geppetto, but yes I don't expect a decision today either 17:06:49 * geppetto nods 17:07:33 Yeh, I'm not saying I saw anything wrong with it … just that FPC is generally closer to a geriatric hedgehog than usain bolt 17:08:24 As it is we only have 4, and limburgher has to leave in 5 minutes or so … 17:08:25 hedgehog? given that we don't have any enforcement power, I'd say ... turtle? 17:09:06 #topic Open Floor 17:09:10 decathorpe: fair enough :) 17:09:12 :) 17:09:15 :) 17:09:18 Fonts issue: https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/issue/935 17:09:21 but yeah, it'll take a while to read through the 1000+ line dfif 17:09:42 decathorpe, you can just read the new file 17:09:56 I confes. I have procrastinated and haven't read that ticket yet 17:09:57 Yeh, if everyone can just put it on their TODO list to read through it this week … hopefully we'll have a meeting next week, as the one after that is a def. no. 17:09:57 decathorpe, its started from the old foile, but not much remains 17:10:11 nim: I know, I was just being overly dramatic :P 17:10:34 mhroncok: I doubt that you even have time for procrastination recently 17:11:10 Anyone have anything else to talk about in the couple of minutes we have left? 17:11:11 geppetto: what's on Nov 28? 17:11:18 decathorpe: thanksgiving 17:11:27 ah, you Americans ;) 17:11:31 * geppetto bows 17:11:59 but good point. I'll try to read the fonts stuff until next week 17:12:17 decathorpe: I hardly have time to work. the modularity dicussions are like hydras. as soon as you answer something, another 2 heads appear 17:12:36 mhroncok: ugh, yeah that's true ... 17:12:54 BTW; does FPC have any "jurisdiction" over modular packaging? 17:13:07 no 17:13:15 oh great :D 17:13:17 same as with non-modular 17:13:29 :D 17:13:38 👍 17:14:07 ok, jurisdiction was the wrong branch of government, I mean legislative power :) 17:14:29 the guidlelines apply to modular packages the same way they apply to non-modular 17:14:46 i.e. past the review, anybody can do whatever they want 17:14:58 ha 17:15:07 right. I was thinking more about the whole "filtering" and "shadowing" stuff 17:15:08 I mean, you're not wrong but … 17:15:46 I mean, if some modular package cleary does something forbidden, you can ask the maintainer to stop a smuch as you can do it in non-modular fedora 17:16:26 about filtering and shadowing, I don't think FPC should make policies 17:16:44 or we would have 3 groups that do them 17:16:59 that's true 17:17:33 alright, I have no more things to say today 17:18:06 Eh, eventaully I think the the guidelines for the module metadata should just be policies like for specfiles … and be under FPC … but I don't enough FPC people know wtf they are atm. … and those that do are invovled anyway 17:18:11 * geppetto nods 17:18:26 right 17:18:52 Ok, see you next week 17:18:57 #endmeeting