15:01:06 #startmeeting Council (2020-01-08) 15:01:06 Meeting started Wed Jan 8 15:01:06 2020 UTC. 15:01:06 This meeting is logged and archived in a public location. 15:01:06 The chair is bcotton. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 15:01:06 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #halp #info #idea #link #topic. 15:01:06 The meeting name has been set to 'council_(2020-01-08)' 15:01:16 #meetingname council 15:01:16 The meeting name has been set to 'council' 15:01:17 #chair jonatoni riecatnor contyk dgilmore dperpeet langdon mattdm sumantrom tyll bcotton pbrobinson asamalik 15:01:17 Current chairs: asamalik bcotton contyk dgilmore dperpeet jonatoni langdon mattdm pbrobinson riecatnor sumantrom tyll 15:01:19 .hello2 15:01:20 asamalik: asamalik 'Adam Samalik' 15:01:26 Happy Wednesday! 15:01:26 #topic Introductions, Welcomes 15:01:30 .hello psabata 15:01:31 contyk: psabata 'Petr Ĺ abata' 15:01:31 hi 15:01:33 everybody is so excited for the council meeting! 15:01:43 .hello dperpeet 15:01:43 dperpeet: dperpeet 'None' 15:01:58 Everyone should be! It's an exciting fresh new decade! 15:02:04 And we have nothing on the agenda! 15:02:23 * pbrobinson is here 15:02:42 hi everyone :) 15:02:54 yay, all the problems are solved :-D 15:03:29 .hello till 15:03:30 tyll: till 'Till Maas' 15:03:39 tyll++ welcome! 15:03:39 bcotton: Karma for till changed to 1 (for the current release cycle): https://badges.fedoraproject.org/tags/cookie/any 15:03:48 bcotton: thank you 15:03:49 hey tyll 15:03:55 Hey! Welcome back! 15:04:02 tyll++ 15:04:02 dgilmore: Karma for till changed to 2 (for the current release cycle): https://badges.fedoraproject.org/tags/cookie/any 15:04:28 Oh hi tyll. 15:04:40 So, for topics of discussion since we don't have waiting tickets... 15:04:57 mattdm: want to give a rundown on the thread you started? 15:05:04 dgilmore: right, that 15:05:14 in fact, two separate threads! dgilmore, which one first? 15:05:25 mattdm: the council list one 15:05:31 ok :) 15:05:32 but the devel list one also 15:05:48 #topic Fedora/CentOS collaboration in the 2020s 15:06:09 I have been on the CentOS devel list since before I started at Red Hat :) 15:06:09 A ten year plan. 15:06:12 mattdm: also DevConf in person we have meetings scheduled, what do we plan to do and achieve there? 15:06:16 #link https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/council-discuss@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/7XKNPDBEVH62BDTVYSEZMHC6J2BUZHKM/ 15:06:21 .hello2 15:06:22 langdon: langdon 'Langdon White' 15:06:23 dgilmore: ok add to agenda :) 15:06:25 sorry im late 15:06:39 dgilmore: ack on devconf meeting 15:06:47 I noticed on that list that CentOS is looking at rethinking their charter and mission and goals and stuff 15:07:09 Which makes sense not just with the new decade but because they've been with Red Hat for 5 years 15:07:09 mattdm: I agree syncing and coming together would be great 15:07:27 To me, this plus CentOS Stream opens up a big opportunity to collaborate better 15:07:44 I suggested several specific things 15:08:23 1. Put CentOS Stream in the Fedora spotlight (basically replacing Fedora Server as an edition) 15:08:37 2. Merging Fedora teams and CentOS SIGs that overlap 15:09:04 3. Taking advantage of merged dist-git to provide faster packages in CentOS and slower ones in Fedora 15:09:31 None of these are do-it-this-year-or-die ideas 15:10:22 But I'd like to get talking and collaborating *now* rather than five more years of going in different directions 15:10:46 So, I dunno if we need to talk about that here at length but all of your thoughts are welcome in the thread 15:11:16 and, I've agreed with some of the CentOS folks that we'll find some time to meet during FOSDEM to make more concrete proposals 15:11:27 I have one concern over #1 I will raise it in the thread, but its not insurmountable 15:11:31 is there a plan for meetings to discuss? should we be having a fedora+centos leadership meeting regularl 15:11:37 *regularly 15:11:40 langdon++ 15:12:00 * dgilmore had no reason to go to FOSDEM this year and is not doing so 15:12:08 dgilmore: me either 15:12:14 and jinxed the pats 15:12:29 lol 15:12:37 langdon: I am good with jinxing the pats 15:12:47 dgilmore: :P 15:12:51 There isn't a plan yet. CentOS Board is just getting in the habit of meeting regularly themselves :) 15:13:00 But that seems like a good topic for FOSDEM 15:13:10 maybe you should explain "junkets" to them... 15:13:32 There was another proposal around recycling Fedora Server; it may or may not be compatible. 15:13:33 lol 15:13:39 * pbrobinson has no idea what "jinxing the pats" is 15:13:51 our first collaboration can be in the Seychelles 15:13:57 contyk: Yeah, the idea of an enterprise buildroot? I think that fits in 15:14:07 pbrobinson: the Patriots lost last weekend and got knocked out of the playoffs 15:14:07 mattdm: Yep. 15:14:12 I'm not super sold on calling that Fedora Server but I could be swayed 15:14:21 pbrobinson: the patriots, my local team, did not make the super bowl ... because I will be in the US for the game (not at fosdem) 15:14:35 I'm also worried about the marketing/legal aspect of that proposal. 15:14:45 But it's just a thought still. 15:15:04 ah, sports ball 15:15:06 fedora server and centos stream serve different roles though, no? 15:15:12 contyk: legal? 15:15:18 pbrobinson: and *american* sportsball at that 15:15:22 let's not invoke legal unless needed :) 15:15:28 and it's NOT EVEN A BALL 15:15:41 I think the enterprise buildroot is important, but that can be tied in with centos collaboration nicely, I think 15:15:48 mattdm: Trademarks and such. 15:15:50 sorry to pull away from sports again 15:16:00 dperpeet++ 15:16:00 langdon: Karma for dperpeet changed to 1 (for the current release cycle): https://badges.fedoraproject.org/tags/cookie/any 15:16:02 mattdm: E.g. having a system that identifies itself as EL and call it Fedora. 15:16:30 contyk: ah. yes, need to tread carefully. may need to avoid the E 15:17:27 mattdm: That might not be possible, depending on the goals; the idea was to have the same macros and strings, dist tags and basically everything. 15:17:44 contyk: dist-tags and functional things are distinct from the name 15:17:45 mattdm: So maybe just not calling it Fedora would be easier. 15:17:52 we just need to be careful with it 15:18:39 let's move to my next thread :) 15:18:56 #topic Fedora's next five years message on devel list 15:19:05 #link https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/ZBU4MYRMMAE2Z7DL4NPPECTMX2FBQAVL/ 15:19:08 I suggested three things here too :) 15:19:11 bcotton++ 15:19:15 ben is ON it :) 15:19:41 I actually don't want to talk about those things here. I want to suggest that you all add to the discussion 15:19:56 not necessarily on the down-in-the-weeds subthreads about at the top level 15:20:23 Because it's meant to be more of community brainstorming than a top-down pronouncement from me 15:20:31 (which is why I picked the devel list) 15:20:53 Maybe some of it should spill over to the council-discuss list, especially the non-technical aspects 15:21:49 mattdm agreed on bringing non-technical discussions off devel list 15:22:21 I can post a follow-up to the council list, and maybe to mindshare as well 15:22:30 #action mattdm will post a follow-up to the council list, and maybe to mindshare as well 15:23:07 Since I told people to not discuss here :) let's move on to the devconf topic :) 15:23:17 #topic Fedora Council at DevConf 15:23:26 I've been avoiding that thread, well mostly email in general if I'm honest, will take a look tomorrow 15:23:40 thanks peter! 15:24:14 For the first time in... six years, I think? ... I didn't submit a talk to DevConf. Because I was feeling very tired. :) 15:24:27 I'm more energized now but do not regret this choice. :) 15:24:40 #link https://pagure.io/Fedora-Council/tickets/issue/285 15:24:44 It will be nice to attend and hallway track and not stress about speaking, for once 15:25:34 As Ben links, at our big meeting (remember that?) we agreed that anyone at DevConf would join a face-to-face meeting the day after 15:25:45 Who all will be there? 15:25:52 (me!) 15:25:56 me! :) 15:25:57 * bcotton will 15:26:08 me 15:26:14 * tyll 15:26:48 I'll be there 15:26:48 I should be there by then 15:27:02 awesome. 15:27:06 although leaving the same day 15:27:48 As for agenda ideas: maybe try to build out a schedule for guests for video meetings 15:27:48 me 15:28:17 sorry, was busy logging in for the ticket :) 15:28:50 I mean, I'm sure just getting in a room to talk will be useful, but if people have more specific agenda ideas over the next few weeeks, put 'em in that ticket 15:28:55 *weeks 15:29:03 mattdm: I didn't submit anything either 15:30:14 pbrobinson: good for you :) 15:30:24 Okay, anything else for this meeting, everyone? 15:31:00 i guess not :) 15:31:03 I have agenda ideas, but I will add them to the ticket :) 15:31:07 riecat++ 15:31:15 thanks everyone! 15:31:29 thanks! 15:31:33 #endmeeting