17:00:20 #startmeeting fpc 17:00:20 Meeting started Thu Feb 13 17:00:20 2020 UTC. 17:00:20 This meeting is logged and archived in a public location. 17:00:20 The chair is geppetto. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 17:00:20 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #halp #info #idea #link #topic. 17:00:20 The meeting name has been set to 'fpc' 17:00:20 #meetingname fpc 17:00:20 #topic Roll Call 17:00:20 The meeting name has been set to 'fpc' 17:00:30 hey 17:00:34 hey 17:00:36 #chair mhroncok 17:00:36 Current chairs: geppetto mhroncok 17:00:46 I'm here o/ 17:01:05 .hello2 17:01:06 ignatenkobrain: ignatenkobrain 'Igor Gnatenko' 17:01:09 I'm partially here 17:01:38 .hello2 17:01:38 nim: nim 'None' 17:02:07 * limburgher here 17:02:37 #chair decathorpe 17:02:37 Current chairs: decathorpe geppetto mhroncok 17:02:41 #chair ignatenkobrain 17:02:41 Current chairs: decathorpe geppetto ignatenkobrain mhroncok 17:02:55 #chair limburgher 17:02:55 Current chairs: decathorpe geppetto ignatenkobrain limburgher mhroncok 17:05:48 Well we have quorum and I don't think tibbs will be here … so 17:05:51 #topic Schedule 17:05:55 #link https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/packaging@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/ZBANUQPPU3O3X6T2D7ELUTMW4JS4NCQ2/ 17:07:52 #topic #935 Fonts packaging policy rewrite 17:07:57 .fpc 935 17:07:58 geppetto: Issue #935: Fonts packaging policy rewrite - packaging-committee - Pagure.io - https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/issue/935 17:08:09 So by my count, decathorpe, mhroncok and myself are +1 17:08:34 So it'd be pretty cool if limburgher and ignatenkobrain could vote :) 17:08:54 yes! 17:09:22 or, alternatively, tell what they want to be changed 17:11:02 I'm +0 17:11:38 I’d like to get the basic packaging bit out of the way so people that want to work on console fonts can define their own guidelines 17:11:39 ignatenkobrain: any changes you'd like to see that would push you to +1 ? 17:11:50 and i can work with tagoh on the fontconfig part 17:13:13 ignatenkobrain, the rpm part in a thin layer over the macro core already used by go and forge macros 17:13:27 geppetto: just making the whole thing less magic :) but you can count me for +1 17:13:59 nim: by those overwngineered and magic macro which nobody except of you can maintain? 17:14:38 ignatenkobrain, it's just basic lua code 17:15:08 ignatenkobrain, if you want to document how to write the generated specs manually, be my guest 17:15:43 ignatenkobrain, the magic is here so contributors do not have to do things by hand 17:15:46 nim: no, we are working in RPM upstream on dynamic packages creation. 17:15:54 limburgher: I think that just leaves you then? 17:15:59 ignatenkobrain, and because everyone here hates to document how to do things by hand 17:16:12 I'm +1 17:16:27 Cool … 17:16:47 #action Fonts packaging policy rewrite (+1:5, 0:0, -1:0) 17:16:59 nim: Go forth and console font :) 17:17:08 thanks all! 17:17:24 I will create a review request for the macro package 17:17:42 the srpm part will need to be in the default buildroot like other srpm macro packages 17:18:28 nim: Ok 17:18:30 and then I guess I have to write a script to open review requests for all the font packages that were waiting on it 17:19:00 #topic #pr-938 Add Package Review Process page 17:19:12 #link https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/pull-request/938 17:19:23 geppetto, as for console fonts I don’t want to car about them at all but others do and may propose guidelines :) 17:19:43 nim: :) 17:20:22 I didn't have time to look at this PR yet, but I think this is something what should be in FPC docs 17:20:44 the wiki vs docs is a mess :( 17:21:04 and I love git and PRs, but working with this is so tedious 17:21:36 what's the progress of packaging antora for fedora? ;) 17:21:40 generally +1 to move it, but I haven't reviewed it yet 17:21:53 decathorpe: does it require gradle? 17:22:02 The PR seems fairly simple, and I can't see anything that would make me want to do anything but +1 17:22:20 We can spend a few minutes on this while people read it, as there's not much else pending 17:22:23 mhroncok: I hope not. it's NodeJS, IIRC 17:22:43 I like it. 17:23:13 sembr would be nice to have, though. it's hard to read it like this 17:24:24 yeh, reading markdown diffs isn't ftw 17:24:29 I relaize that asking contributors to do sembr is hard. we should do it instead 17:32:51 how relevant is this line: "* Packages merged from the old Fedora Core repository" 17:33:39 decathorpe: we can drop it later 17:33:51 decathorpe: I mean, perfect is the enemy of good 17:35:17 true 17:36:57 ship it +1 17:38:11 some "should" should be replaced by "SHOULD" or "MUST", but that's not important right now 17:40:02 I'm +1 17:41:45 yeah, looks good to me. +1 17:41:55 Official +1 17:42:51 ignatenkobrain: It's all on you :) 17:47:28 * mhroncok brb 17:47:32 puppy needs to go out 17:53:36 * mhroncok is back 17:54:50 I have a hard stop in 6min. 17:55:44 limburgher: You want to vote on the above? 17:56:03 Sorry … wrong person … who didn't vote 17:56:24 I mean, I *do* live near Chicago... 17:56:25 ignatenkobrain: It's you? 17:57:03 yeh, I got it right above … nevermind … we can pick it up next week, I know ignatenkobrain said he was only sort of here this week. 17:58:18 #topic Open Floor 17:58:28 Only got a couple of minutes … but anything pressing? 17:59:26 please vote on the python PR? 17:59:29 in the pr 17:59:45 #link https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/pull-request/940 17:59:46 That's #940 17:59:52 yeh, that one 18:00:23 oof I somehow missed that PR. I'll vote on the ticket 18:01:10 #endmeeting