13:00:54 #startmeeting CPE PO Office Hours 13:00:54 Meeting started Thu Jun 4 13:00:54 2020 UTC. 13:00:54 This meeting is logged and archived in a public location. 13:00:54 The chair is amoloney. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 13:00:54 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #halp #info #idea #link #topic. 13:00:54 The meeting name has been set to 'cpe_po_office_hours' 13:01:04 .hello nphilipp 13:01:05 nils: nphilipp 'Nils Philippsen' 13:01:17 .hello2 13:01:18 bcotton: bcotton 'Ben Cotton' 13:01:26 hi there 13:01:40 .hello siddharthvipul1 13:01:41 siddharthvipul_: siddharthvipul1 'Vipul Siddharth' 13:01:53 #info About the CPE Team https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/cpe/ 13:02:06 #topic open floor discussion 13:02:19 .hello defolos 13:02:20 Defolos_: defolos 'Dan Čermák' 13:03:41 any updates from GitLab beside what has been put into the ticket? 13:06:26 Hi Defolos_ not really no. Clement and I met with the community manager and they are interested in having an AMA session on IRC sometime later this year (most likely September given the data center move the CPE team are doing now) to talk to the Fedora community 13:06:48 Im going to talk more to them on arranging this 13:08:23 ie what exact date & time, if they want to use this time slot, what, if any pre-requsites they would like people to have tested/tried with GitLab CE to give them feedback on its services, etc and probably help them understand Fedora's technical community needs firsthand 13:09:16 This only came up last Thursday and we have had a company day of learning + an Irish bank holiday since, so it is still very much an idea that came up 13:09:31 Do you think people would be interested? 13:10:10 definitely, beforehand we will let folks on -devel and -infra know and I am sure we will have interested people joining 13:11:21 Hello 13:12:39 mboddu: welcome to the Fedora Project :) 13:13:19 siddharthvipul_: What is Fedora project? :P 13:13:38 amoloney: yes, I would be definitely interested 13:14:10 especially if we get some devs from GitLab as they could answer some technical questions that are currently still open 13:14:20 e.g. what Neal mentioned about the message bus 13:14:48 amoloney: Before doing so, ask them to have some answers to the gitlab ticket that cverna created. And we can discuss the answers rather than asking the same things over and over again 13:15:03 +1 mboddu 13:15:08 that makes a lot of sense 13:16:09 Defolos_: The gitlab ticket has all the technical questions, including the message bus IIRC 13:16:20 ticket needs to be updated for sure and I think it would also be a great addition to have GitLab devs/technical people + community managers on a panel during an IRC call later this year 13:17:13 at the very least its making sure we are keeping the conversations transparent and gives the community direct access to talk to GitLab without the middleman 13:17:26 or middlewoman in this case too :) 13:20:44 amoloney: Yeah, anyone who can answer the technical questions from gitlab side is what we are interested in talking to 13:21:14 +1 on the IRC session 13:27:13 cool, I will work on organizing a session with GitLab then. Just for expectations though, we might not see this session scheduled until around september to allow for the completion of the data centre move and maybe even a few days holidays before the summer is over 13:27:53 amoloney: thank you :) 13:28:11 this gives time to set a preliminary agenda of what the community would like to talk about, and if GitLab has any prerequisites for us to have tried/tested before the IRC session too 13:28:12 amoloney: thanks! As long as this is communicated, I doubt there will be an issue 13:28:53 Oh definitely! There is a saying of 'Once Bitten, Twice Shy' that comes to mind! 13:30:10 amoloney: Okay, never heard of that saying :). But thanks for planning this. 13:30:35 * Defolos_ never heard that as well 13:30:38 mboddu: because you are new in Fedora 13:30:43 :P 13:30:49 troll inside 13:33:24 siddharthvipul_: Oh, thats what fedora project is? Lot of unknowns :D 13:33:38 mboddu: ikr :P 13:35:08 I have opened https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/220309 a few hours ago. I think this is a blocker for dist-git on GitLab 13:35:29 cverna++ 13:35:40 I wonder how much code they need to change on their end to support it 13:35:58 will be waiting for GitLab's answer or work around for that 13:36:13 IIRC they cannot support it for some technical reasons (recollecting an article that I read a while back) 13:36:37 yeah let's wait and see 13:37:06 I ll create another issue for rabbitmq support also, which is also a blocker imo 13:37:23 but this is maybe something we can help to contribute upstream if needed 13:40:21 * mboddu thinking of rubygems now 13:53:51 mboddu: don't packaging ruby isn't too much fun 13:54:02 * Defolos_ is maintaining a whole lot of them in openSUSE… 13:58:15 2 minute warning folks! 14:00:29 thanks for your time today everyone, good feedback on having an IRC session soon w/GitLab 14:00:34 see you all next week! 14:00:39 cheers! 14:00:43 #endmeeting