18:30:14 #startmeeting docs 18:30:14 Meeting started Wed Jun 15 18:30:14 2022 UTC. 18:30:14 This meeting is logged and archived in a public location. 18:30:14 The chair is bcotton. Information about MeetBot at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Zodbot#Meeting_Functions. 18:30:14 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #halp #info #idea #link #topic. 18:30:14 The meeting name has been set to 'docs' 18:30:26 #chair pboy darknao 18:30:26 Current chairs: bcotton darknao pboy 18:30:27 #topic Roll call 18:30:29 hi. 18:30:34 .hi mateusrodcosta 18:30:35 mateusrc: Sorry, but user 'mateusrc' does not exist 18:30:39 .hi 18:30:40 .hi 18:30:40 pboy: pboy 'Peter Boy' 18:30:43 darknao: darknao 'Francois Andrieu' 18:30:59 .hello mateusrodcosta 18:31:01 mateusrc: mateusrodcosta 'Mateus Rodrigues Costa' 18:31:56 I'm here for once. 18:34:01 we have a great party going :-) 18:34:58 Yes, it will blow up my meeting statistic. 18:35:33 #topic Agenda 18:35:36 #info Announcements 18:35:37 #info Review action items 18:35:37 #info Revitalization status 18:35:54 #info Open floor 18:35:55 #topic Announcements 18:35:56 #help Some release notes still need written: https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/how-to-write-fedora-release-notes/38311 18:36:02 #info We're using the docs-fp-o repo to track meta-work 18:36:02 #link https://pagure.io/fedora-docs/docs-fp-o/issues 18:36:16 any other announcements to make? 18:36:52 #topic Previous action items 18:36:54 #info pbokoc to finally add a relnotes guide to the contributor docs 18:37:26 still todo, pbokoc? 18:37:41 bcotton, Grrr, yeah, I keep forgetting about it. Still todo :) 18:38:35 it's all good, we'll get there 18:38:35 #action pbokoc to finally add a relnotes guide to the contributor docs 18:38:43 #info bcotton to close F34 release notes issues 18:38:47 done! 18:38:59 #info pboy to update the docs team page with his revised content 18:39:00 also done! 18:39:09 #info bcotton to draft Docs Team Charter 18:39:10 not done 18:39:16 #action bcotton to draft Docs Team Charter 18:39:31 #info darknao to find out if we can use SAML groups on Fedora Docs GitLab group and still grant additional access to individual repositories 18:39:45 darknao is still still a todo or did i forget to remove it from my script after last week? 18:40:07 it's done 18:40:22 we can do that 18:40:31 yay 18:40:32 #info darknao to configure the docs repos in GitLab with CI to run builds on MRs (we can add additional checks later) 18:40:44 how about that one? 18:40:45 we can even add other saml group link to sub-group of the docs namespace 18:40:55 that also done, kinda 18:41:47 done enough or should we keep tracking it? 18:41:54 for now, it's only deployed on the contributors-guide repo 18:42:12 but it seems good enough to use it on other repositories as well 18:42:35 #info CI is deployed on contributors-guide repo but seems good enough to use on the rest 18:42:43 and include it in the repository template too 18:42:53 #action darknao to configure the remaining repos in GitLib for CI 18:43:54 unfortunately, i don't have any PR open to showcase it 18:44:42 but basically, it'll build the docs, and provide a preview instance to show all the changes in the PR 18:46:23 awesome 18:46:24 and maybe later, I'll see if I can add some xref links checks, adoc linter and so on 18:46:35 that'd be great 18:46:48 #topic Revitalization status 18:46:55 #link https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/a-brief-resume-2-months-after-the-revitalization-session/38795/ 18:46:55 #link https://hackmd.io/ZIrWEjFKQEW7GdU0aonofw 18:46:55 #link https://pagure.io/fedora-docs/docs-fp-o/issue/189 18:47:13 i feel like we had open questions from last week's meeting 18:47:38 unfortunately, for personal reasons, i haven't been able to start on the draft of the charter. i'm hoping to have that done by the end of this week 18:48:35 Independently from the charter we should consider how to continue to improve our revitalisation 18:49:36 One idea: conceptalise a commblog in about 4 weeks about one task we are doing. 18:50:11 Another: enlarge our "footprint", i.e. more info on our team page. 18:51:16 i like the commblog idea. that will help get us in front of a wider pool. i'm not sure how many people visit our team page to begin with, so it might not be very effective to put a lot of effort into it 18:51:55 yes, commblog has an immediate wider impact. 18:53:23 One idea: just we start soon with our restructuring, we can present one reworked or have reworked article (either abound Installation or about DNF) and ask for feedback, that way trying to involve more people 18:53:46 that's a good idea 18:54:16 i was talking with Anushka Jain earlier today and presenting her work on redesigning the front page is another good article idea 18:55:07 Yes, agreed. 18:55:19 Do we have something to look at? 18:56:24 Hi, how is the current status of permissions? 18:56:53 pboy: The entire documentation is here- https://www.figma.com/file/7nsbTWEsQGZQQOLD8xg8Fd/Fedora-Docs--Outreachy-Contribution-Phase?node-id=0%3A1 18:58:11 It's a lot an hard to look at :-) 18:59:06 Without an account, how can I enlarge it? 19:00:36 I guess the +/- keys should work for that, or you can press alt and scroll your mouse up/down( windows) and zoom in/out on your trackpad ( mac) 19:02:07 I've an iMac, without trackpad though. Works with mouse. Thanks. 19:04:10 Looks nice! 19:04:29 Thankyou:) 19:05:04 Is the 3rd week a modification or alternative to our curent box design? Or is it more conceptual? 19:07:04 I'm seeing some PatternFly inspiration here, I really like it :p 19:07:36 The grey boxes are supposed to be a placeholder for images, I couldn't get the right ones just yet, so I left it at that. Other than that I feel it to be a concept! 19:08:29 darknao: Oh yes, I didn't know about the library till today, now I have it on my system. While creating this I just looked at Fedora Design styleguide:) 19:09:35 AnushkaJain[m]1: Also in week 3 there are 2 concepts, I tried to go with one of them in week 4😅 19:10:49 Oh, I see. Looks really promising! 19:11:35 Much more informative but still "pretty". 19:13:47 our two main goals :-) 19:14:28 Yeah, but Before we run out of time: mateusrc and I are in the starting blocks to work on content. 19:14:39 pboy: haha, there might seem to be an information overload without illustrations for sure! 19:14:41 When and how can we start so that we have some "fodder" for a commblog? 19:15:05 I already connected my FAS to Gitlab 19:15:39 So, I'm ready to start whenever I have a task and permissions 19:16:07 AnushkaJain[m]1. Yes, the images take off the threatening 19:16:22 * So, I'm ready to start as soon as I have a task and permissions 19:16:35 mateusrc: +1 19:17:12 mateusrc: you should be able to open PR without any specific permissions 19:17:43 .hi 19:17:44 py0xc3[m]: Sorry, but user 'py0xc3 [m]' does not exist 19:17:45 Sure, so my task was something related to LiveCD, right? 19:17:47 sorry for being late :( 19:17:58 Soemthing about the live session? 19:18:00 btw, pboy, I think I fixed the permission settings on the doc namespace, so you should be able to commit, and merge PR now 19:18:15 darknao: I think, we first need a repo for the dnf guide (that's he will begin with) 19:18:44 pboy: Oh, yeah, now I remember, a DNF guide 19:18:49 darknao yes, it works, much to my surprise earlier today. 19:18:56 Thanks a lot. 19:20:26 I wasn't aware of that and asked Ben to merge it. But it was already and I didn't notice. :-) 19:22:21 Well, in a first step we need to know, where to put the text of the reworked anaconda guide und the reworked dnf guide. How could we handle that? 19:22:52 for the new repository, I can either create it now, or you can create your own using the doc template, and once you have something ready, we can move/copy it to the docs namespace 19:23:47 darknao: I must admit, I would rather you created it. 19:24:05 I have still to become familiar with gitlab. 19:24:47 And would grant mateusrc and me commit permissions. 19:24:47 ok, then just tell me how you want to call it, and where you want it 19:25:52 Well, the titles would be Anaconda Guide and DNF Guide. You seem to habe some naming convention in mind. 19:25:59 So it is best you decide that. 19:26:23 And I think it should be in the docs namespace, or? 19:27:12 I don't think there is any naming convention right now :) 19:27:46 I guess it will go in the Fedora Linux Documentation sub-group then 19:27:55 OK, then simple AnacondaGuide and DNFGuide? 19:28:12 Linux sub-group sounds fine. 19:29:07 Can be Anaconda Guide or maybe Fedora Linux Anaconda Guide if we want to keep the implied naming convention 19:29:41 That's OK 19:30:00 I mean, I'm quite open to the naming right now, but it's best to agree on something sooner than later 19:30:21 I mean Fedora Linux [Anaconda|DNF] Guide 19:31:41 Yeah, I think Matthew is emphasizing Fedora Linux. :-) 19:31:58 ok, done 19:33:23 mateusrc: could you send me a contact mail to pboy@uni-bremen.de, so I have your mail and we can contact indpendently from the time zone? 19:34:00 pboy: Sure, but I guess my fedoraproject email redirects to the real one anyway, so maybe you could use that? 19:34:19 In any case I will check later 19:34:37 okay, we're over time. anything else that can't wait? 19:34:39 Last time I checked I didn't find it. 19:35:03 Ok, I will send it later then 19:35:32 thanks 19:35:50 Okay, time is up, indeed! 19:36:11 thanks everyone! 19:36:13 #endmeeting