20:07:35 #startmeeting Spins SIG meeting 20:07:35 Meeting started Mon Mar 21 20:07:35 2011 UTC. The chair is cwickert. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 20:07:35 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #halp #info #idea #link #topic. 20:07:47 #chair nirik brunowolff 20:07:47 Current chairs: brunowolff cwickert nirik 20:08:04 #topic F15 spins 20:08:24 #info no new spins were marked ready for SIG, so there is nothing to discuss today 20:08:47 #info we haven't heared back on spins that are going to be dropped either 20:09:13 #info brunowolff has updated the spins release list to include the ks only versions of Desktop and KDE spins 20:09:28 # link https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/15/Spins 20:09:33 #link https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/15/Spins 20:09:47 #topic Biarch spin 20:10:29 #info nothing new from the biarch spin and the spin owner jkratochvi is not around today, so we need to delay this topic once again 20:10:49 #topic Open floor 20:10:56 ok, one thing I had: 20:11:07 I am working toward doing the nightly composes in koji. 20:11:29 This has a number of advantages, and a few disadvantages. 20:11:52 Here's a mock up of them from yesterday: 20:11:54 http://www.scrye.com/~kevin/fedora/2011-03-20-nightly-spins.html 20:12:07 it's a simple page, but hopefully it will provide the links/info people need to get to the builds. 20:12:11 advantages of this: 20:12:24 * finishes in 30min instead of all day like the single threaded compose machine. 20:12:43 * Keeps 2 weeks (scratch build timelimit) of builds around, so you can go back and look at old ones. 20:13:03 * means we can not have to deal with the compose machine hanging on things or having issues. 20:13:08 Disadvantages: 20:13:23 * The size isn't obvious, you have to click down into the build to get the size. 20:13:38 * we can't add custom builds or things from testing. 20:14:02 So, just thought I would let everyone know and provide feedback if they wanted. ;) 20:14:31 It's odd that the alternate KDE spin is there, but the alternate Desktop spin isn't. 20:14:48 nirik: thanks a lot for your work 20:14:48 I would have expected both or neither. 20:14:51 they didn't ask me to ever compose it. 20:15:02 that was last cycle and they dropped the idea. 20:15:36 OK, maybe we'll end up dropping that KS file if we ever hear back from spin owners. 20:15:50 yeah, I think we could... but yeah. 20:16:01 * nirik has to step away for a bit... thats all I had. 20:16:08 I talked to QA about the QA Test Day spin ks file and they are using it. It should get some updates 20:16:33 though. As it refers to some stuff that is gone and the desktop icons won't work with gnome3. 20:16:55 It works as is, so no real hurry. 20:17:25 brunowolff: what is the 'alternate' desktop spin? 20:17:44 KDE and Desktop each have two ks files. 20:17:56 targeting different size? 20:18:12 As far as I know both are going to use the CD size ones for the ISOs at release. 20:18:20 Yes, different sizes. 20:18:29 huh? 20:19:03 Desktop has a 700MiB and a 1GB version of their spin. 20:19:12 ok, that was my question 20:19:18 KDE has a 700 MiB and a 2GB version of their spin. 20:19:33 which ones do the want to be composed? 20:19:46 nirik: what was your approach to find out which spins to do? 20:19:53 did you just mail people? 20:20:03 Desktop used 700 MiB for last release and we haven't heard anything to change that. 20:20:09 cwickert: yeah, basically just did the ones we did before + any that people asked me to. 20:20:22 but I can adjust to do just approved ones if you want. 20:20:25 or whatever we decide. 20:20:40 Kevin Koffler commented in email that KDE also is going to use the 700MiB for the release ISO. 20:20:52 nirik: ok, so people approached you. that is much better than having to ask each and every potential spin maintainer 20:21:11 yeah 20:21:19 For now we should keep doing the old ones, so breakage is easy to spot. But I think some will get 20:21:21 dropped. 20:21:28 * nirik has to step away again for a bit. 20:21:44 ok, thanks for your report, nirik! 20:22:03 brunowolff: I agree we should do the old spins for now 20:22:34 For example Design Suite is broken because it was not based on the Desktop spin and wasn't updated for gnome changes. 20:23:04 jepp 20:23:11 I need to poke them 20:23:23 lets summarize 20:24:39 #info nirik has been working on the nightly composes. They are now using koji instead of a homebrew script. This has many advantages such as faster creation and an archive of the last two weeks of composes 20:25:19 #link http://www.scrye.com/~kevin/fedora/2011-03-20-nightly-spins.html 20:26:29 brunowolff, nirik: so we agree to switch to niriks new compose method? 20:26:56 +1 20:26:59 +1 20:27:18 #agreed the spins SIG agreed to use niriks new compose method 20:28:03 #agreed to compose all the old spins for now even if we haven't heared back from their owners in order to spot problems in the spins 20:28:16 When the change actually happens we should advertise it on at least one list and update the Spins SIG page. 20:28:17 brunowolff: ok, anything more from your side? 20:28:24 yupp 20:28:34 That's it. 20:29:09 #action cwickert to poke all spins maintainers once again. a lot of spins are broken ATM because of the GNOME changes and we are not sure all spin maintainers are aware of it 20:29:25 #topic Open Action items 20:29:44 we have two open action items from previous meetings 20:30:05 from last week we have: rdieter and the KDE SIG to make a formal spins page for the KDE spin 20:30:48 and from the week before we have: cwickert to contact the desktop folks and ask them about the size they are targeting 20:31:00 this is what I will do together with the other mail just now 20:31:13 and we have a third action item which is not in the meeting minutes 20:31:49 it was: jsmith to ask rel-eng for info about the compose process 20:31:58 Related to this the Cloud guys had a draft spin page as well, that they are reviewing. 20:32:14 Don't think it was ready for us just yet. 20:32:17 I will do my part and poke the owners of the action items once again 20:32:23 you have the url? 20:32:53 Just a min... 20:32:55 #action cwickert to poke the owners of previous action items once again 20:33:31 #link http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EC2_unspin 20:33:48 I suggested not using unspin as part of the name. 20:33:53 * cwickert looks 20:34:32 I think they wanted to indicate it's not a spin and doesn't need to follow the guidelines 20:34:55 not sure about this but I do know that I dislike the name as well 20:35:15 ok, I think that's all for today 20:36:03 the 'unspin' page is way from complete, lets wait until it's finished and they come back at us 20:37:05 * cwickert will end the meeting in 3 mins 20:40:33 #endmeeting