17:00:29 #startmeeting FAmSCo 2012-12-27 17:00:29 Meeting started Thu Dec 27 17:00:29 2012 UTC. The chair is sesivany. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 17:00:29 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #halp #info #idea #link #topic. 17:00:36 #meetingname famsco 17:00:36 The meeting name has been set to 'famsco' 17:00:43 #topic Roll call 17:00:50 .fas eischmann 17:00:50 sesivany: eischmann 'Jiri Eischmann' 17:01:41 anyone up for the meeting? aeperezt_mb, cwickert, nb? 17:02:01 .fas cwickert 17:02:02 cwickert: cwickert 'Christoph Wickert' 17:02:44 two people to reach the quorum... 17:03:31 bckurera, tuanta and herlo seem to be offline, I cannot spot them anywhere 17:04:04 cwickert: I was a bit worried that it would end up like this. 17:04:09 never mind 17:04:16 we can still do something useful 17:04:20 cwickert: but I asked everyone if he could come or not. 17:04:24 like talk about the EMEA budget 17:05:38 cwickert: yeah, that's something I wanted to work on tonight or tomorrow. I've been sick since Dec 23rd, today I finally feel better. 17:05:54 uuh 17:05:57 good timing 17:06:54 .fas aeperezt 17:06:54 aeperezt_mb: aeperezt 'Alejandro Perez' 17:07:40 looking at the meeting agenda (https://fedorahosted.org/famsco/report/9), I see that there is a ticket about FADs open for a long time. That's something we should solve, too. 17:07:59 sorry i got stuck on something 17:08:02 well, we brought the issue up 17:08:31 sesivany: rbergeron did not seem to like our idea of letting FAmSCo handle FADs 17:08:36 so be here but kind of away 17:08:50 #topic Review process of FADS 17:09:22 cwickert: I understand her point, but currently it's pretty much in no man's land. 17:09:37 ..famsco 296 17:09:39 .famsco 296 17:09:39 https://fedorahosted.org/famsco/ticket/296 17:09:50 some fads are tracked in famsco tracker, some in in fudcon-planning... 17:10:21 that's just an technical problem, but we are facing a bigger social one: 17:10:31 there is nobody who can act as a budget owner 17:10:47 I mean, we want somebody who knows the global community 17:11:00 cwickert: well, guess the only one is FPL. 17:11:01 and who can make a decision whether or not something is worth funding 17:11:07 I don't see anybody 17:11:40 Ruth was hired to do *something*, not sure what exactly here job description is 17:12:06 but I don't think she knows the ambassadors or the community good enough yet 17:12:19 and I haven't seen much work from her anyway 17:12:37 and rbergero is busy as hell 17:12:44 so, who should do it? 17:12:51 cwickert: yeah, that's the problem. 17:13:17 cwickert: FPL is the most suitable person for that, but rbergeron is too busy for that. 17:13:26 and I am afraid there is not much we can do. we brought up our proposal, but the FPL was opposed 17:13:47 the only way to move forward: nag the FPL 17:14:05 either accept our proposal or come up with something better 17:14:34 cwickert: I'll most likely go to FUDCon, so I can nag her personally :) 17:14:48 that's definitely a topic we should discuss there. 17:14:48 * cwickert canot go to FUDCon this year :( 17:14:58 s/canot/cannot 17:15:37 cwickert: do you know if anyone else from famsco is coming? 17:15:44 don't know 17:16:05 nb is coming 17:16:35 herlo too according to the registration. 17:17:24 should we already look into a plan b? 17:17:36 plan b = alternate proposal 17:18:11 like, leave the process as it is currently but make it clear who is budget owner, where to file tickets etc 17:18:29 basically what rbergero wants 17:19:32 I see two possible solutions: we either get an annual budget for FADs and are the budget owner, or there is no budget and someone who knows the financials best has to handle it and approve fads based on what the budget situation is currently like. 17:20:25 I don't think that does fly 17:20:34 someone who knows the financial best == rbergeron or suehle 17:20:41 I mean, the person supposed to have a clue about the budget is suehle 17:20:51 but she cannot make decisions about people 17:21:01 at least I think so 17:21:45 she can always nag rbergeron about it 17:21:57 this will go nowhere 17:22:13 has anybody been reimbursed for FAD Rheinfelden already? 17:22:20 * cwickert doesn't think so 17:22:23 if suehle does all the bookkeeping hardwork and rbergeron only the decisions itself she might have time for it. 17:22:53 well, that's how it's probably supposed to work already and we all know it doesn't work 17:23:19 cwickert: my request hasn't even been approved yet. rbergeron assured me in a private mail that I would get paid, but no progress so far. 17:25:02 same for all the others 17:25:05 do you think creating another track for fads would help it at least from the technical point of view? 17:25:24 well, we could think about using fudcon-planning 17:25:38 or renaming it to premier-events to make it more clear 17:26:22 but still, events are somehow regional 17:26:39 and people who know best about the regions are the people from that region 17:26:58 I am not saying the FAD budget needs to go into regional support 17:27:11 but at least the decisions should be don't locally 17:27:42 I think there are two problems: 1. who does the decision if the FAD is worth and how much we can spend on it, 2. approving particular requests, reimbursements etc. we can't do much about 1. without rbergeron, but we can improve 2. 17:28:54 * cwickert fully agrees 17:29:09 but to be honest, I don't even know how 2 is supposed to work 17:29:21 I mean, take FAD Rheinfelden again 17:29:36 the person who is supposed to make the payments is probably kital 17:29:43 or not? 17:29:57 yes 17:30:01 he is 17:30:11 I mean, can a CC holder make payments for the premier events budget or only from regional support? 17:32:00 that's a question. I think he should be able to do both. It's just a tool to pay people and it shouldn't matter from what budget it goes. That's a different problem. 17:32:53 but then we need to do some internal accounting to tie cc holder's expenses to budgets they belong to. 17:33:40 I think there is nothing we can do here 17:33:52 we need to discuss this with rbergero and rsuehle 17:34:02 otherwise this will go nowhere 17:34:11 another problem is that kital's cc will expire very soon, and AFAIK he doesn't want to do it any more. I've been promised a community cc, but no progress so far. 17:34:36 * sesivany is making notes for his meeting with rbergeron and suehle at fudcon. 17:34:53 I don't think kital's cc expires soon 17:34:59 I think end of 2014 17:35:02 * cwickert looks 17:36:37 during 2014, but I don't know when 17:36:41 my card willexpire in 2013, i would not have hard feelings handing it over 17:36:52 I would take one 17:37:03 I had a big fight with kital about this last week 17:37:04 that's what he sent me, but it at least doesn't say he doesn't want to do it :) 17:37:21 well, he is not happy about the changes we made 17:37:44 but I think the biggest problem was he did not understand them 17:37:56 cwickert: what changes? the regional budgets? 17:38:01 yes 17:38:06 and that we want a budget 17:38:51 in emea-swag-tracking #193 I asked him to give us a budget 17:38:57 for the whole CLT event 17:39:16 he just calculated 400 EUR and he said he is able to make the decision 17:39:21 I think that's one of the best things we've done, and for example the approval process works better, famsco is not overwhelmed by tickets,... 17:39:34 yes, but he completely got it wrong 17:39:44 his impression was that FAmSCo wanted more power 17:39:58 instead we are giving up power by letting the ambassadors decide 17:40:15 yeah, I think FAmSCo has lost a lot of power :) 17:40:23 which is a good thing 17:40:26 and I'm happy about it 17:40:35 just what Max wanted to do 17:40:54 what Max did doesn't fly any more. 17:41:08 but kital insisted that Max had given the cc holders the power to make decisions up to a certain level 17:41:18 basically what the peer review level is 17:41:46 I told him there is nothing wrong with it, but if the requester is also the peer, it looks fishy 17:42:10 and the other misunderstanding was about the budget 17:42:32 I wanted a budget for the *whole* event, that includes the sponsoring for example 17:42:51 and kital claimed that 400 would be enough for CLT 17:42:59 and that he then could decide 17:43:17 but he doesn't include travel expenses, right? 17:43:36 well, he wants to have 4 people at the booth 17:43:41 that is him and 3 others 17:44:02 and he will stay with his parents and pay for himself 17:44:30 but it's not about power, it's about having an idea how much we're going to spend. 17:44:32 so, 400 EUR might be enough for 3 people, but not the total event for the budget 17:44:41 *amen!* 17:44:48 that's what he didn't understand 17:44:56 I said I don't care who makes what decision 17:45:06 but I want to know how much we spend in total 17:45:21 he didn't know about the whole budget planning thing 17:46:06 if he says he needs €1000 he'll get it and we trust him enough that he'll spend it wisely, but we need to know that we will need €1000 for this events. Nothing more nothing less. 17:46:31 yeah 17:46:45 we wrote some angry mails but I called him up the next morning 17:46:50 too bad he couldn't come to Rheinfelden, we could have explained him everything. 17:47:01 and we had a very good conversation 17:47:15 everything was fine after that 17:47:49 we agreed that he had USD 500 that he can spend as the event owner 17:48:07 means he can book rooms for the booth people and reimburse them for travel 17:48:42 everything else, like sponsoring or additional people will have separate tickets and will be handled by the ambassadors 17:49:00 so in the end, he still can make decisions within the peer review limit 17:49:13 I think it was just a big misunderstanding 17:49:31 but it shows that kital is not up to date with the latest developments 17:49:52 he is very busy with his dayjob and that's why he will probably give up cc in 2014 17:50:07 if $500 is not enough for him, we can discuss the limit, but I think the amount is just right and no one objected. 17:50:14 right 17:50:23 anyway, this case is closed 17:50:32 problem solved, everybody happy 17:50:48 but we probably need to explain our changes better 17:50:54 I think we need two cc holders in emea anyway. 17:51:00 ack 17:51:05 you or me? 17:51:27 how about you apply first and I take over when kital's card expires? 17:52:05 having two owners in EMEA and both in Germany is kind of unfair 17:52:14 I've already applied, AFAIK rbergeron even pushed that request, she asked the last week if I got it or not. But nothing so far. 17:53:08 ok, then I probably should apply already to get my card in 2014 ;) 17:53:47 it makes sense for rbergeron because there are a lot of contributors in Brno and she sometimes needs to pay them airfare, lodging. etc. It's better if it's done by someone on site. 17:53:59 ack 17:54:11 you being a RH employee makes many things easier 17:54:32 #action sesivany to nag rbergero about his CC 17:55:15 #action cwickert to apply for a CC *if* kital's expires and he doesn't want to do it any longer 17:55:45 back to premier events 17:55:51 how about we call for a meeting 17:56:09 the two of us plus rbergero and suehle 17:56:22 and everybody else who's is interested 17:57:27 do you want to do it before fudcon? 17:58:02 don't know 17:58:09 it sucks so hard I cannot come 17:59:36 maybe I can discuss it with them at fudcon to clear some things up and then call an irc meeting to include more people. But then we should at least be on the same page. 17:59:52 kinda prediscussion at fudcon and then at irc. 18:00:17 ok 18:00:34 I suggest the two of us make some suggestions by mail 18:00:42 ok 18:00:59 #action cwickert and sesivany to agree on FAD process before FUDCon 18:01:05 #undo 18:01:25 #action cwickert and sesivany to draft suggestions for improving the FAD funding process before FUDCon 18:01:29 sounds better 18:01:41 ok, that's all we can do here I think 18:01:48 what about budget? 18:02:00 I mean, we were supposed to draft something 18:02:09 but I haven't done my homework yet 18:02:25 I need to add the numbers we worked out at Rheinfelden to the wiki 18:02:42 this was in fact an action item from the EMEA meeting 18:03:04 yes, please do that, then I take them and add other figures such as media production. 18:03:28 ok, I'll let you know when I am done 18:03:39 I'll do it right after this meeting 18:03:54 the only action item I did not yet do, all others are resolved :) 18:03:57 I'll use this page for it: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Ambassadors/EMEA/Budget 18:04:50 ok 18:05:01 I'll just add my numbers there 18:05:01 then I'll track actual expenses and we'll have a clear overview of what we planned to spend and what we actually spent. 18:07:37 speaking of planning, any news about fosdem booth? 18:07:58 nope 18:08:32 I think they will be confirmed beginning of January 18:09:46 leslie promised me that she would let me know in a couple of days how many beds she's going to have for us in the apartments. No response from her either. 18:10:14 that's something we have to solve in the first week of Jan, too. 18:10:46 * cwickert is not surprised 18:11:11 * cwickert feels like fighting against windmills 18:11:52 do we have a backup plan? some hotel that is not very expensive? 18:12:11 in the past we always let people book for themselves 18:12:33 and I think we already have some people like GeroldKA and fab_a who booked the Renaissance again 18:12:58 I mean, it's not cheap, but they have good weekend specials 18:13:08 definitely worth it, good value for money 18:13:19 because the hotel is awesome 18:13:47 http://www.marriott.com/hotels/travel/BRUBR-Renaissance-Brussels-Hotel 18:14:09 I created a wiki page http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FOSDEM_2013 - please add yourself and take over the ownership. I'm a preliminary owner, but it should be owned by someone who's been at FOSDEM before. 18:15:37 * cwickert does it now 18:17:20 sesivany: ha, suehle is coming to FOSDEM 18:17:25 we can nag her there 18:18:22 rbergeron is not coming? 18:18:48 she's not in the list, but not everyone going is there yet. 18:20:27 lets hope she comes 18:21:27 ok, I changed the wiki page 18:22:02 if nothing more needs to be discussed, I'd like to end this meeting now because I need to leave 18:22:57 #endmeeting