16:00:05 #startmeeting FAmSCo 2013-06-03 16:00:05 Meeting started Tue Jun 3 16:00:05 2014 UTC. The chair is cwickert. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 16:00:05 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #halp #info #idea #link #topic. 16:00:18 #meetingname FAmSCo 2013-06-03 16:00:18 The meeting name has been set to 'famsco_2013-06-03' 16:00:31 #chair cwickert tuanta 16:00:31 Current chairs: cwickert tuanta 16:00:38 #topic Roll call 16:00:49 ping, who is here for the famsco meeting? 16:00:54 .hellomynameis tuanta 16:00:55 tuanta: tuanta 'Truong Anh Tuan' 16:01:03 .fas cwickert 16:01:03 cwickert: cwickert 'Christoph Wickert' 16:01:14 ping lbazan masta 16:01:21 ping yn1v 16:01:31 #chair lbazan masta yn1v 16:01:31 Current chairs: cwickert lbazan masta tuanta yn1v 16:01:31 ping robyduck 16:01:40 #chair robyduck 16:01:40 Current chairs: cwickert lbazan masta robyduck tuanta yn1v 16:01:41 .fas yn1v 16:01:41 yn1v: yn1v 'Neville A. Cross' 16:01:52 * yn1v Nicaragua 16:02:16 .fas lbazan 16:02:18 lbazan: lbazan 'Luis Enrique Bazán De León' 16:02:23 we missed Jiri only 16:02:37 * cwickert tries to reach him 16:03:44 Jiri will join us in a minute, I suggest we just wait 16:03:59 #chair sesivany 16:03:59 Current chairs: cwickert lbazan masta robyduck sesivany tuanta yn1v 16:04:12 .fas eischmann 16:04:12 sesivany: eischmann 'Jiri Eischmann' 16:04:16 hi everyone 16:04:23 sesivany: morning! 16:04:26 hi sesivany 16:04:30 #info All 7 FAmSCo members present. yay! 16:04:42 #topic Announcements 16:04:47 wow, that's something we should celebrate :) 16:05:05 xD 16:05:20 I've got one... it's more like a message. 16:05:21 #info Robyn has stepped down as FPL and Matthew Miller is the new FPL, see https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/announce/2014-June/003215.html 16:05:56 #info FAmSCo would like to thank Robyn for her work as FPL. There are no words to describe what she has done for us and means for us. 16:05:57 that's an important announcement... 16:06:13 +1 cwickert 16:06:40 #info FAmSCo is looking forward to work with Matthew, he already has some interesting ideas about governance in Fedora.next which also affect us and the ambassadors 16:06:45 sesivany: your turn 16:06:58 * robyduck is here, I'm always late (trains...). Sorry. 16:07:52 #info FUDCon APAC 2014 in Beijing was really successful. The level of organization was exceptional. 16:08:01 sesivany: +1 16:08:38 we should encourage the APAC community to start thinking about the next location soon. 16:08:40 great to hear that, sesivany 16:09:12 that's all from me in terms of announcements. 16:09:28 we will do, sesivany 16:09:32 thanks sesivany 16:09:36 anything else? 16:09:38 ! 16:09:41 https://fedorahosted.org/famsco/ticket/365 16:09:54 .famsco 365 16:09:54 https://fedorahosted.org/famsco/ticket/365 16:10:10 #topic Leonardo Vaz - Stepping down the mentor role 16:10:17 * cwickert reads 16:11:28 .fasinfo delete 16:11:29 robyduck: User: delete, Name: Matías Kreder, email: mkreder@gmail.com, Creation: 2009-06-01, IRC Nick: delete, Timezone: America/Argentina/Buenos_Aires, Locale: en, GPG key ID: 2048R/54A62E60, Status: active 16:11:32 robyduck: Approved Groups: fedorabugs packager ambassadors cla_fedora cla_done freemedia marketing +fedora-socialmedia cla_fpca 16:12:09 lbazan: the LATAM community is ok with the change? 16:12:57 lbazan: I don't know Matias, can you tell us something? 16:13:00 lbazan: what is FAS name of the old mentor? 16:13:03 I'll take it to the meeting of Wednesday - Fedora Ambassador meeting (latam) 16:13:17 .fas ivaz 16:13:17 cwickert: ivazquez 'Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams' - schiwax 'ahmed shivaz' 16:13:50 .fas lvaz 16:13:53 cwickert: lmvaz 'Leonardo Menezes Vaz' 16:14:00 that's the right one I guess 16:14:10 .fasinfo lvaz 16:14:11 cwickert: User "lvaz" doesn't exist 16:14:21 .fasinfo lmvaz 16:14:23 cwickert: User: lmvaz, Name: Leonardo Menezes Vaz, email: leonardo.vaz@gmail.com, Creation: 2009-01-27, IRC Nick: lvaz, Timezone: America/Sao_Paulo, Locale: en, GPG key ID: 1024D/A4743E5C, Status: active 16:14:24 Leonardo Vaz - brasil 16:14:26 cwickert: Approved Groups: cla_fpca cla_done cla_fedora 16:14:39 cwickert: the fas is lmvaz :-) 16:14:47 lbazan: hold on 16:14:54 was he mentor without being ambassador? 16:14:55 cwickert: you might have met Leonardo at FOSDEM or DevConf this year. 16:15:05 lmvaz is not even an ambassador 16:15:21 no no wait 16:15:25 seems lmvaz is not an ambassador or mentor 16:15:27 that's weird because he should be. 16:15:36 .fasinfo tuanta 16:15:37 tuanta: User: tuanta, Name: Truong Anh Tuan, email: tuanta@iwayvietnam.com, Creation: 2008-09-27, IRC Nick: tuanta, Timezone: Asia/Ho_Chi_Minh, Locale: en, GPG key ID: EF8D50BF, Status: active 16:15:40 tuanta: Approved Groups: @famsco @ambassadors @gitfama freemedia cla_fedora cla_done packager fedorabugs cla_fpca 16:16:46 he's leaving the group of ambassadors... 16:16:54 .fasinfo lvaz 16:16:56 tuanta: User "lvaz" doesn't exist 16:17:15 I don't see Leo at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Ambassadors_Join_choose_a_mentor either 16:17:58 yes, we can not find him 16:18:21 and I cannot find him in FAMAs trac either 16:18:40 he may remove himself 16:18:46 lbazan: please talk to him and clear the situation about his status. 16:18:51 I can see in the wiki history 16:18:52 sesivany: ok 16:19:00 I don't think we should make any decision today. 16:19:14 sesivany: ok 16:19:22 #link https://fedoraproject.org/w/index.php?title=Ambassadors_Join_choose_a_mentor&diff=378482&oldid=377192 16:19:22 I feel that we are looking two different issues here 16:19:23 so before we make somebody a new mentor, I would like to know what the old mentor has done. 16:19:29 there is also a regional meeting on Wed where you should also discuss it before FAmSco makes a decision. 16:19:42 sesivany: ok 16:19:50 sesivany: FAmSCo does not make a decision anyway 16:19:59 the existing mentors do 16:20:21 well, we kind of make a decision 16:20:24 cwickert: yeah, but we can make some kind of blessing :) 16:20:46 first he needs to be nominated by the existing mentors 16:20:51 lbazan: you are a mentor, right? 16:20:56 cwickert: yes 16:21:10 ok, then I think you can nominate him 16:21:11 We have one issue about filling up a mentor appointment and in the other hand if there was a mistake with giving lmvaz the mentor status not being a ambassador 16:21:30 I'm taking this to the list of mentors for general review. 16:21:44 ! 16:22:00 cwickert: ok 16:22:09 I suggest we look at the two things here 16:22:21 one is the new mentor, the other is the process 16:22:36 ok 16:22:43 * robyduck agrees with cwickert, let's not mix up the two things 16:22:49 for the new mentor, I suggest you first discuss this with the local community 16:22:57 does everybody agree? 16:23:00 cwickert: +1 16:23:04 cwickert: +1 16:23:13 +1 16:23:22 +1 16:23:45 +1 16:24:02 #action lbazan to discuss the proposed new mentor Matias Kreder ('delete') in the LATAM meeting and get back with the result to us 16:24:21 :) 16:24:22 * tuanta gives +1 too 16:24:23 we will confirm him if the local community is ok with him 16:24:50 should we request the mentors to discuss this, too, on the mailing list? 16:25:16 cwickert: +1 16:25:24 * cwickert wonders if lbazan's nomination actually counts or if it requires more than one mentor to nominate a new candidate 16:25:24 at least LATAM mentors 16:25:49 #action lbazan also ask the mentors for feedback about Matias 16:26:04 ok, I think that's all for this particular case 16:26:10 cwickert: yes! 16:26:14 cwickert: do we have a clear process description of how one can become a mentor? 16:26:16 cwickert: normally one mentor is enough to propose a new mentor, and FAmSCo approve him by voting 16:26:27 anything else on Matias before we move on to the more general problem of the process? 16:26:29 I haven't been able to find it now. 16:26:29 the proposal can be done also by a FAmSCo member 16:27:01 sesivany: let me dig it up for ypou 16:27:47 quote from https://fedoraproject.org/w/index.php?title=Ambassadors_Join_choose_a_mentor : "Prospective mentors are nominated by existing Mentors and confirmed by FAmSCo" 16:28:11 ok, so we do have to make a decision. 16:28:14 yes, that is the current process, cwickert 16:28:55 Along the years it has changed, it was a FAmSCo invitation, but FAmSCo was always relayed on local mentors to validate the decision 16:29:14 http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2010-01-07/fedora-meeting.2010-01-07-18.06.log.html#l-279 16:29:33 yn1v: as far as I know this is still the recent process 16:29:50 I remember we also discussed a while back if the regional communities can nominate mentors. 16:29:52 I mean, as long as I hear nothing new, I take the wiki is correct 16:30:29 we also discussed this at Milan, robyduck, sesivany, do you remember? kital was not there but Gerold was 16:30:33 yes the wiki is correct, and sesivany yes we discussed it time ago, but without a concrete decision 16:30:37 so one of the 'old' folks 16:30:48 cwickert: it was in Paris I think 16:30:49 I think we should formalize the process a bit 16:30:57 robyduck: right, paris 16:30:58 cwickert: +1 16:31:01 cwickert: +1 16:31:07 let us open a new ticket for that 16:31:12 cwickert: in what way? 16:31:14 I think we need to confirm the nomination (by voting) 16:31:27 sesivany: I want to have this at least documented 16:31:33 that's meaning of above quotes 16:31:34 +1 16:31:37 like the vote should happen in Fama trac 16:31:45 or FAmSCo trac 16:31:47 cwickert: ok, I agree. 16:32:21 a ticket has been opened in FAmSCo Trac now, so we can follow it 16:32:32 to vote on 16:32:43 and we should have a process, but a very lightweight one: "1: To nominate, file a ticket here, 2, To confirm it needs to be discussed on the mentors list, 3. FAmSCo appoints the person" 16:33:03 or along the lines of this, but I don't want to add too much red tape 16:33:12 +1. That is simple enough 16:33:36 cwickert: I think we should also have an opinion from the local community. 16:33:49 sesivany: right 16:33:59 * cwickert was thinking of something like: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_sponsor_a_new_contributor#Becoming_a_Fedora_Package_Collection_Sponsor 16:34:04 for me their opinion is more valid than opinions of current mentors from other regions who don't even know the candidate. 16:34:14 If you're a packager and feel that you are ready and would like to move up to sponsor status, simply file a ticket in the packager sponsors ticket system. These tickets are automatically sent to the sponsors list. A report will be added containing information on your reviewed and owned/comaintained packages, but feel free to provide additional information that can't easily be found such as informal reviews done or prospective packagers you 16:34:28 something similar to this should do I think 16:34:36 sesivany: agree, there were some concerns about nominating only by mentors indeed 16:34:37 except that people don't nominate themselves 16:34:49 robyduck: famsco and mentors then? 16:35:25 cwickert: can't follow you, you mean nominating? 16:35:56 no self nomination, some people see mentor as a next level and request mentoring status just because of the status 16:36:09 +1 16:36:17 +1 16:36:26 +1 16:36:43 #action cwickert to file a ticket about the process to become a mentor 16:37:00 cool 16:37:00 we were also thinking about giving that right to the communities. So for example if they get 5 votes of ambassadors at the regional meeting, they can nominate the person. 16:37:04 +1 16:37:24 not sure if it's necessary. They can also ask a mentor in their region to do it. 16:37:36 sesivany: I think we still need a confirmation from famsco and the existing mentors 16:37:58 cwickert: I was only talking about nomination, not approving. 16:38:05 be careful, sesivany. I prefer just existing mentors can nominate new ones 16:38:34 they are people who know exact if they need more resources or not 16:38:36 sesivany: I don't know if we should add 5 votes of the local community, mentors should nominate and perhaps the new mentor should be discussed first in the local community, for final FAmSCo appointing 16:39:02 or something like packager sponsor: the mentors have 1 week to speak up. if there is +5, the candidate is confirmed by the mentors and the finaly say is at FAmSco. If there is any negative votes, this needs to be discussed further 16:39:12 anyway, let's keep it simple 16:39:13 robyduck: it shouldn't be an additional condition, but another way to nominate a mentor. 16:39:33 ok 16:40:19 frankly I would avoid double approval. Mentors nominate, FAmSCo approves. Simple. 16:40:33 I'm fine with it, but as cwickert said, let's not add too much red tape here. 16:40:36 sesivany: +1 16:40:54 ok, I will draft something and send it to famsco list for discussion 16:41:00 anything else on this now? 16:41:01 thanks cwickert 16:41:08 thanks cwickert 16:41:38 robyduck: from what I understood it was like: 1. a mentor nominates, 2. mentors approve, 3. FAmSCo confirms and appoints. I would remove the second step. 16:42:14 +1 sesivany. that's enough, I think. 16:42:43 sesivany: I wouldn't, but we will figure this out 16:43:06 Should we move on? does anybody have another topic to discuss? 16:43:24 af, I got your point, sesivany. step #2 should not be removed 16:44:00 I think it should, it's unnecessary red tape, but that's a discussion for the ticket. 16:44:13 ok 16:44:37 I would discuss the status of fudcon latam, and maybe the first steps for apac next year. 16:45:21 sesivany: +1 16:45:54 #topic FUDCon LATAM and APAC 16:46:11 lbazan, yn1v: any updates? 16:46:23 for APAC next year, there is a candidate, Singapore, but we need to confirm with organizing team 16:46:39 Last week I went to the university to confirm dates 16:46:53 * cwickert needs to leave soon. sesivany, please take over chairing the meeting, lbazan, don't forget to update the ticket with the results of today's discussion 16:46:57 go ahead tuanta ... 16:47:06 cwickert: ok 16:47:16 yn1v, you can go 16:47:43 * lbazan xD 16:47:56 and the dates have been confirmed or not? 16:48:09 looks like we will having fudcon one week earlier Octuber 23-25 instead of octuber 30-31 and Nov 1 16:48:43 They said yes to everything, but at last moment said that they will need a bit of confirmation 16:49:02 to avoid collision with activities from other departments 16:49:37 I supposed to get the confirmation yesterday by email... I will write after meeting to see how it is going 16:49:44 #info FUDCon LATAM might take place one week earlier - Oct 23-25. 16:50:28 I think that will be easier to advertise dates within the same month ;-) 16:51:27 I feel it is just matter of formality from the university, that it will be confirmed 16:52:06 yn1v: what about travel subsidies? Are they going on already? 16:52:20 date change was to allow students to attend the event without overlapping examination/test week 16:52:44 No, we haven't open a call for papers because of the date 16:53:24 yn1v: when you start the meetings in fudconplanning? 16:53:25 I will press for an answer so we can send the call for papers as soon as possible 16:54:07 mmm don't know ... next week 16:54:35 yn1v: ok, keep us updated. 16:54:36 lbazan, any day hour suggested for fudconmeetings ? 16:55:29 yn1v: depends on their availability 16:55:30 World Cup is coming, so you should start soon 16:55:40 tuanta: :o +1 16:56:17 I will send a mail to local collaborators to ask for time/day for meetings 16:57:01 yn1v, you can create a whenisgood or doodle for getting votes 16:57:25 mmmm yn1v you need the instance in trac 16:57:54 * tuanta has to go in two minutes 16:58:15 I will have to go too. 16:58:32 so we can close the meeting in time 16:58:36 yes, I do need to have "fudcon latam 2014 " as a category/marker/whaever in trac 16:58:40 lbazan, yn1v: that's something you can figure out yourselves in LATAM. 16:59:00 I'm ending the meeting in one minute. 16:59:04 sesivany: ok 16:59:31 I will log in at fudcon planning trac and se who is administrator and request the changes 17:01:34 #endmeeting