17:01:00 #startmeeting F21 Alpha Go/No-Go meeting 17:01:00 Meeting started Thu Sep 4 17:01:00 2014 UTC. The chair is jreznik. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 17:01:00 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #halp #info #idea #link #topic. 17:01:12 #meetingname F21 Alpha Go/No-Go meeting 17:01:12 The meeting name has been set to 'f21_alpha_go/no-go_meeting' 17:01:25 #topic Roll Call 17:01:42 * jreznik has a bad feeling it's going to be a quick meeting today... 17:01:49 jreznik: indeed 17:02:27 seems simple enough 17:02:42 but at least we moved to the real release process with F21, good job anyone, even we're not completely ready 17:02:53 * nirik waves 17:02:57 so who's in today? 17:04:03 * jzb is around if needed. 17:04:19 hole 17:04:20 hola 17:04:23 anyone from QA, adamw? 17:04:33 hi dgilmore 17:04:44 #chair nirik dgilmore jwb 17:04:44 Current chairs: dgilmore jreznik jwb nirik 17:06:16 * tflink can do qa if nobody else shows up but probably isn't the best person to do so :) 17:06:30 * pjones here too 17:06:35 neldogz here 17:06:44 * amita here 17:06:44 tflink is always the best person around :) 17:06:52 #chair tflink pjones 17:06:52 Current chairs: dgilmore jreznik jwb nirik pjones tflink 17:06:54 yes true :) 17:06:59 ok, so let's move on 17:07:18 #info just a reminder - Readiness meeting follows in two hours later, even we say No-Go today 17:07:24 * roshi is here as well 17:07:46 #topic Purpose of this meeting 17:07:47 #info Purpose of this meeting is to see whether or not F21 Alpha is ready for shipment, according to the release criteria. 17:07:49 #info This is determined in a few ways: 17:07:50 #info No remaining blocker bugs 17:07:52 #info Release candidate compose is available 17:07:53 #info Test matrices for Alpha are fully completed 17:07:55 #link http://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/milestone/21/alpha/buglist 17:07:56 #link https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_21_Alpha_TC5_Install 17:07:58 #link https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_21_Alpha_TC5_Base 17:07:59 #link https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_21_Alpha_TC5_Desktop 17:08:59 as we do not have a RC we can not be go 17:09:01 this should be quick for qa - there are still open blockers 17:09:08 and the RC part :) 17:09:12 * nirik nods. No way we are go. 17:09:25 ok, then let's just call it no-go and get back to work? 17:09:31 #topic Current status 17:09:38 #info as we do not have a RC we can not be go 17:09:58 #info qa is no-go, there are still open blockers 17:10:17 ok, so it's really simple question 17:10:55 clearly it's no-go. 17:10:57 proposal #agreed Fedora 21 Alpha is No-Go due to no Release Candidate available and open blocker bugs 17:11:02 ack 17:11:03 Yup.... no-go seems obvious 17:11:08 * jreznik could just go with agreed :( 17:11:12 ACK 17:11:44 ack 17:11:47 ack 17:11:59 #agreed Fedora 21 Alpha is No-Go due to no Release Candidate available and open blocker bugs 17:12:22 ack 17:12:57 #action jreznik to announce slip, the next Go/No-Go is on 2014-09-11 17:13:25 but maybe we can take a quick look what else we need to make sure we Go next week 17:14:04 looking on the current blockers list, there's 1088933 with needinfo on dgilmore 17:14:12 .bug 1088933 17:14:15 jreznik: Bug 1088933 update grubby to support device tree options for arm - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/1088933 17:14:35 I need to sit down and redo the patches 17:14:58 #info dgilmore to redo patches for bug 1088933 17:15:18 dgilmore: any expectations on it? how much work it is? 17:15:32 jreznik: there is some bugs in what I have written 17:15:40 its a matter of covering some corner cases 17:16:01 ok, thanks 17:17:00 do you want to go through the other bugs in ASSIGNED/POST state? 17:17:18 we just did a review yesterday, not sure that needs to be done again 17:17:46 that's why I'm asking but we have right people here today for some of them 17:18:03 roshi: thoughts? 17:18:39 adamw commented 1134524 and the comment worries me a bit 17:18:41 .bug 1134524 17:18:46 jreznik: Bug 1134524 Product-ized network install images do not offer filtered group lists - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/1134524 17:18:57 I think things are mostly covered - a review probably won't do much 17:20:05 yeah, that doesn't sound good :-/ 17:20:07 seems like quite a lot of work will be needed for this bug, https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1134524 17:20:30 for sure 17:21:17 if we need to touch anaconda, mirrormanager it's a best time to try to coordinate it/file bugs etc. 17:21:49 dgilmore: any thoughts what else will be needed? 17:22:58 or ideas where to start to make it moving 17:24:46 seems like he's out, let's talk out of this meeting not to bother other folks here :) 17:24:57 #topic Open floor 17:25:19 anything else for today? any concerns with Alpha? 17:25:59 eh, the go/no-go is now? 17:26:04 i thought it was in like 4 hours 17:26:12 * roshi has nothing for this meeting anyways 17:26:32 well, jreznik raised the major issue i'd like to highlight, yeah - that's going to be a problem, we need to at least get dgilmore and anaconda folks together on that one, possibly drag in more people if necessary 17:26:40 (e.g. sgallagh, kalev) 17:26:48 adamw: yeah, I touched it above 17:27:11 adamw: in two hours there's readiness :) you'd kill me with go/no-go in 4 hours 17:27:38 oh right 17:27:41 would be great to know at least where to start with it 17:27:41 so, no go not ready :P 17:27:54 :) 17:28:52 adamw: so, do you have any idea where to start to make sure it's moving? seems like not an easy task 17:32:04 * jreznik is going to end meeting now and move the discussion out of it, seems like noone is now interested to talk about it :) 17:32:13 setting fuse, 3... 17:32:36 2... 17:32:43 interested, sure. Capable of providing any kinds of answers, no :) 17:32:55 roshi: same here :( 17:32:58 1... 17:33:10 #endmeeting