15:00:46 <pwhalen> #startmeeting Fedora ARM & AArch64 Status Meeting
15:00:46 <zodbot> Meeting started Tue Apr  7 15:00:46 2015 UTC.  The chair is pwhalen. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
15:00:46 <zodbot> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #halp #info #idea #link #topic.
15:00:46 <pwhalen> #chair pwhalen bconoboy pbrobinson dgilmore hrw jsmith kyle ddutile dmarlin
15:00:46 <zodbot> Current chairs: bconoboy ddutile dgilmore dmarlin hrw jsmith kyle pbrobinson pwhalen
15:00:53 <hrw> o/
15:00:57 <jsmith> \o
15:00:58 * pbrobinson waves
15:01:04 <pwhalen> good morning folks, hope everyone enjoyed the long weekend
15:01:08 <pbrobinson> \o/
15:01:08 <bconoboy> hiya
15:01:09 <jsmith> It was long?
15:01:21 <pbrobinson> 4 days for pwhalen and I :-P
15:01:28 <hrw> 3 for me
15:02:27 <bconoboy> wait, I didn't have to work yesterday? dangit
15:02:30 * jsmith sighs...
15:02:33 <pwhalen> alright, lets get started with the usual suspects..
15:02:37 <pwhalen> #topic 1) ==== Kernel Status ====
15:03:28 <pbrobinson> we're near 4.0 which will be GA for F-22, with rc7 I'd like to see as many people (other than pwhalen and myself) testing the f-22 images on as many devices as possible
15:03:36 <pwhalen> morning ctyler
15:03:42 * ctyler waves
15:04:18 <pbrobinson> so anyone have any feedback on the kernel for aarch64 or ARMv7 at all?
15:04:48 <pbrobinson> kylem: did you get a chance to look at the state of RPi2 kernel bits by chance?
15:04:49 <pwhalen> armhfp i dont think we have anything pending. aarch64.. ?
15:05:00 <hrw> I think that we got the important parts for aarch64 included.
15:05:01 <kylem> pbrobinson, heck no.
15:05:08 <kylem> maybe this week?
15:05:25 * kylem has a pressing thing to finish first.
15:05:26 <hrw> and with fixed dtb usb and kvm works on mustang
15:05:34 <pbrobinson> kylem: no issues
15:06:03 <pbrobinson> hrw: good news, so that just needs vendor or a 0.16 FW
15:06:27 <hrw> yes
15:07:19 <pwhalen> anything else?
15:07:40 <pbrobinson> not from me
15:07:48 <hrw> nothing rc blocking from me
15:07:53 <pwhalen> #topic 2) ==== Package Status & Issues  ====
15:08:06 <hrw> ghc?
15:08:11 <pbrobinson> it's fixed
15:08:26 <pbrobinson> just aligning all the bits to get everything else rebuilt against the fixed NVR
15:08:56 <pwhalen> #info ghc fixed, currently aligning all the bits to get everything else rebuilt against the fixed NVR
15:08:56 <pbrobinson> so then we see how much is actually fixed.... or not
15:08:59 <pbrobinson> getting there
15:09:54 <pwhalen> any other stand outs?
15:10:36 <pbrobinson> strace is probably the main rawhide one ATM, the maintainer is aware of it
15:12:36 <pwhalen> #info strace broken, maintainer is aware
15:12:44 <pwhalen> #link https://arm.koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=8896
15:13:19 <pwhalen> sounds like we should have some change next week with ghc fixed
15:13:29 <pwhalen> next?
15:13:30 <pbrobinson> yep
15:13:38 <pbrobinson> no others on my list currently
15:13:57 <pwhalen> #topic 3) ==== Fedora 22 Beta TC1 for AArch64 ====
15:14:08 <pwhalen> #info Testing Results:
15:14:08 <pwhalen> #link https://fedoraproject.org/w/index.php?title=Architectures/AArch64/QA/22_Beta_TC1
15:14:10 <hrw> s/TC1/TC2
15:14:26 <pwhalen> not sure we discussed tc1
15:14:30 <hrw> ok
15:14:33 <pbrobinson> TC2 https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/arm/2015-April/009328.html
15:15:13 <bconoboy> What needs to happen before the TC becomes an RC?
15:16:13 <pbrobinson> bconoboy: mainline needs to hit all the bits which means we're ready
15:16:32 <pwhalen> couple issues identified in tc1 that should now be resolved in tc2 - 1) package abrt-cli-2.3.0-5.fc22.aarch64 requires abrt-addon-ccpp on the server repo/dvd 2) TC version appearing in anaconda
15:16:34 <pbrobinson> bconoboy: if mainline isn't ready it means there's core blockers open
15:17:10 <pbrobinson> bconoboy: which by definition means we'll likely be affected by them and we don't progress to RC
15:17:17 <bconoboy> #info per pwhalen, tc1 issues expected to be resolved in tc2: 1) package abrt-cli-2.3.0-5.fc22.aarch64 requires abrt-addon-ccpp on the server repo/dvd 2) TC version appearing in anaconda
15:18:13 <pwhalen> any other issues in TC1?
15:18:36 <bconoboy> #link TC2 is available for testing, https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/arm/2015-April/009328.html
15:18:48 <hrw> booted here
15:19:24 <bconoboy> pwhalen: is there already a TC2 test page?
15:19:43 <pwhalen> small, we default to minimal in TC1 on the server netinstall iso
15:19:53 <pwhalen> bconoboy, not yet, TC2 *just* finished.
15:20:04 <bconoboy> heh, okay
15:20:11 <pbrobinson> bconoboy: it was announced moments ago.... pwhalen is good.... but ;-)
15:20:19 <pwhalen> i wanted to discuss tc1 before we move on to TC2 here though
15:20:20 <bconoboy> he's really good ;-)
15:21:58 <pwhalen> #info 22_Beta_TC2 Test result page:
15:22:03 <pwhalen> #link https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Architectures/AArch64/QA/22_Beta_TC2
15:22:53 <pwhalen> anything else for tc1/tc2?
15:22:54 <bconoboy> \o/
15:23:16 <pbrobinson> not at the moment from me
15:23:46 <pwhalen> #topic 4) ==== F22 - Beta Testing (armhfp) ====
15:24:01 <pwhalen> #info Fedora 22 Beta TC8 is the latest.
15:24:02 <pwhalen> #info === Please help test and update the Fedora wiki with results:
15:24:02 <pwhalen> #link https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Summary
15:24:20 <kylem> the only armhfp i can test this week is trimslice.
15:24:47 <pbrobinson> kylem: if you've got some cycles to do so it would be fab
15:26:52 <kylem> yeah.
15:27:30 <bconoboy> #info kylem to test trimslice- volunteers for other armv7hl boards sought
15:27:31 <pwhalen> i just started on tc8, should have results up shortly. could use the help with the desktop testing
15:27:40 * jsmith can test BBB
15:27:49 <bconoboy> #info jsmith to test BBB
15:28:25 <hrw> can TC builds for aarch64 have same numbers as primary ones?
15:29:11 <pbrobinson> hrw: you mean like TC8?
15:29:13 <pwhalen> hrw, that would be confusing to jump right up to TC8
15:29:26 <hrw> pbrobinson: yes
15:29:44 <hrw> pwhalen: with f21 iirc we has such jump
15:29:54 <hrw> tc1, tc2, tc6 or sth like that
15:30:08 <pwhalen> why though?
15:30:14 <pbrobinson> hrw: what value does it provide?
15:31:07 <hrw> pbrobinson: just asking
15:32:01 <kylem> consistency i suppose, if we know TC$n+1 has the same arch indep fixes as the corresponding build on primary.
15:32:36 <hrw> consistency was missing word
15:33:30 <kylem> i guess my question is when we do a secondary TC build, does it have the same NVR as the corresponding primary, or does it include later fixes to common things?
15:33:34 <pbrobinson> kylem: we're close to that now but not quite there yet, was hoping to be in closer lockstep once we hit beta RCs
15:33:52 * kylem nods.
15:36:07 <pwhalen> #topic 5) == Open Floor ==
15:36:48 <hrw> TC2 booted so I will create some crazy installation howtos
15:38:12 <pwhalen> cool.. anything else for today?
15:38:23 <pbrobinson> not from me at the moment
15:38:31 <pbrobinson> just report bugs report issues :)
15:38:36 <pbrobinson> and help test!!
15:39:06 * jsmith has nothing to add
15:39:16 <bconoboy> nothing for this week
15:39:22 <pwhalen> #endmeeting