16:00:15 <pwhalen> #startmeeting Fedora ARM and AArch64 Status Meeting
16:00:15 <zodbot> Meeting started Tue Jan 12 16:00:15 2016 UTC.  The chair is pwhalen. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
16:00:15 <zodbot> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #halp #info #idea #link #topic.
16:00:15 <zodbot> The meeting name has been set to 'fedora_arm_and_aarch64_status_meeting'
16:00:15 <pwhalen> #chair pwhalen bconoboy pbrobinson dgilmore hrw jsmith dmarlin
16:00:15 <zodbot> Current chairs: bconoboy dgilmore dmarlin hrw jsmith pbrobinson pwhalen
16:00:27 <pwhalen> good morning folks, whos here?
16:00:36 <dmarlin> morning pwhalen
16:01:39 <pwhalen> good morning dmarlin
16:01:49 * pbrobinson waves
16:03:12 <pwhalen> not many here, but i know its late for you pbrobinson, lets get started
16:03:20 <pwhalen> #topic 1) ==== Package Status & Issues  ====
16:04:02 <pwhalen> i think the #1 still remains a new binutils/systemd rebuild.
16:04:17 <pbrobinson> looking OK, we have a fixed grep failure today which should catch us up for the already small diff we have
16:04:20 <pwhalen> using the rpms hrw built last week i was able to do some rawhide installs
16:04:52 <pbrobinson> I thought that was landing upstream and we should get it once we're back in sync
16:04:58 <pwhalen> #info grep failure fixed today which should catch us up further.
16:05:21 <pwhalen> my understand was we just needed a new build for it, sadly doesnt look like hrw is here
16:05:40 <pwhalen> pinged
16:05:43 <hrw> sorry
16:05:54 <dgilmore> hola
16:05:57 <dgilmore> .helo
16:06:01 <dgilmore> .hello
16:06:01 <zodbot> dgilmore: (hello <an alias, 1 argument>) -- Alias for "hellomynameis $1".
16:06:03 <pwhalen> no worries, just discussing issues.. what do we need for binutils?
16:06:09 <dgilmore> .hello ausil
16:06:10 <zodbot> dgilmore: ausil 'Dennis Gilmore' <dennis@ausil.us>
16:06:13 <pwhalen> good morning dgilmore
16:06:26 * masta looks in
16:06:48 <pwhalen> hrw, my understanding was just a new build of 2.26, rebuild of systemd?
16:07:00 <hrw> pwhalen: update to snapshot
16:07:48 <hrw> 2.25 is latest release. we need 2.26 snapshot
16:09:06 <pwhalen> ah, i see, sounds like we can only wait?
16:09:43 <hrw> we can discuss with nickc and try to convince him
16:09:57 <hrw> for us it is release blocker ;(
16:10:42 <pwhalen> right, ok.
16:11:33 <pwhalen> #info Binutils still needs build of 2.26 snapshot for aarch64.
16:11:42 <pwhalen> anything other issues?
16:11:50 <pwhalen> er *any
16:11:56 <hrw> not from me
16:12:03 <pbrobinson> not currently
16:12:03 <hrw> we had issue with grep but it got solved
16:12:26 <pwhalen> hrw, right, mention just prior to you joining..
16:12:27 <pbrobinson> be aware of gcc6 and golang 1.6 coming soon
16:12:41 <pwhalen> #topic 2) ==== Kernel & Uboot Status ====
16:12:47 <hrw> pbrobinson: and mass rebuild after them
16:12:50 <pbrobinson> plus boost/ghc/nodejs4 and frinds
16:13:27 <pbrobinson> yep, dgilmore and I are in planning for those....
16:14:10 <pwhalen> #info 4.3 headed to stable on f23. Tested on armhfp, aarch64 without issue. Please test your favourite boards!
16:14:40 <pwhalen> #info 4.4 final now in rawhide, pending aarch64 build.
16:14:45 <dgilmore> pwhalen: sorry network dropped out
16:15:14 <pwhalen> dgilmore, no worries
16:15:32 <pbrobinson> dgilmore: excuses ;-)
16:17:24 <dgilmore> pbrobinson: its my story and I am sticking to it
16:17:53 <dgilmore> I have been testing 4.4 on tegra, wandboard quad and cubox-i
16:17:57 <pbrobinson> anyway for kernel just test
16:18:01 <pwhalen> #info Current U-Boot: uboot-tools-2016.01-0.4.rc4.fc24
16:18:05 <pbrobinson> new bits being enabled
16:18:09 <pwhalen> #link http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=710222
16:20:18 <pwhalen> #topic 3) ==== Rawhide Status ====
16:21:43 <pwhalen> Ive been testing rawhide on aarch64 locally using hrw's rpms for binutils 2.26 and systemd.. didnt hit any other issues, but thats when we have that pending fix.
16:21:56 <pwhalen> for armhfp
16:22:11 <pwhalen> #link https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_24_Rawhide_20160112_Summary?rd=Test_Results:Current_Summary
16:23:45 <pwhalen> despite the checks there for arm images, they dont boot to initial-setup in my testing and require a change to the initial-setup symlink in the ks, we no longer need to specify gui or text and just i-s.service
16:24:20 <pbrobinson> will review than this week
16:25:13 <pwhalen> todays minimal image, booted ok in vexpress, kickstart install worked without issue. xfce booted to login on bpi-pro
16:26:02 <pwhalen> #info Please update the QA wiki with testing results.
16:26:17 <pwhalen> anything else for rawhide?
16:26:47 <pbrobinson> nope
16:26:56 <pwhalen> #topic 4) == Open Floor ==
16:27:55 <pwhalen> i see a few of you got your chromebooks going thanks to masta's page, awesome, doing that today as well. everything up to date?
16:28:37 <masta> pwhalen: There are a few unknowns going on with those instructions, mostly around the size of those silly chromebook kernel partitions
16:29:29 <masta> in some cases the instructions are not working for mysterious reasons, yet to be solved. So looking for any/all feed back
16:30:04 <pwhalen> masta, ok, will be cautious as i go, thanks.. and so far was smooth sailing
16:30:29 <hrw> chromebook partitioning is not so complicated
16:30:47 <pwhalen> anything else for this week folks?
16:31:00 <hrw> gpt, big enough kernel partiition (set type, priority), rootfs partition. done
16:31:33 <hrw> on samsung one it was fine to have 4MB kernel partition with uboot there + rootfs
16:31:40 <masta> hrw: apparently 24 MiB is the largest anybody has got to work on chromebook kernel partition
16:31:58 <hrw> masta: do 4MB one and put chain uboot there?
16:32:04 <pwhalen> lets move this to fed-arm, so pbrobinson can go to sleep :)
16:32:06 <masta> hrw: too small for initramfs + kernel to go inside FIT image
16:32:14 <masta> ok, eof
16:32:30 <pwhalen> #endmeeting