13:00:59 #startmeeting Workstation WG 13:00:59 Meeting started Mon Aug 14 13:00:59 2017 UTC. The chair is stickster. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 13:00:59 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #halp #info #idea #link #topic. 13:00:59 The meeting name has been set to 'workstation_wg' 13:01:02 #meetingname workstation 13:01:02 The meeting name has been set to 'workstation' 13:01:04 #topic Roll call 13:01:06 .hello pfrields 13:01:07 stickster: pfrields 'Paul W. Frields' 13:01:26 .hello ryanlerch 13:01:28 ryanlerch: ryanlerch 'Ryan Lerch' 13:01:49 .hello kalev 13:01:50 kalev: kalev 'Kalev Lember' 13:02:23 .hello catanzaro 13:02:24 mcatanzaro: catanzaro 'Michael Catanzaro' 13:02:39 .hello mclasen 13:02:40 mclasen: mclasen 'Matthias Clasen' 13:02:56 #chair ryanlerch kalev mcatanzaro mclasen 13:02:56 Current chairs: kalev mcatanzaro mclasen ryanlerch stickster 13:03:15 no sign of cschaller here 13:03:49 *nod 13:03:57 well, either he'll make it or he won't, I guess 13:04:13 #info Agenda uses issues list 13:04:15 #link https://pagure.io/fedora-workstation/issues?status=Open&tags=meeting 13:04:37 Mine is the only issue? 13:04:39 #topic Add new GNOME core apps 13:04:41 Nobody else has issues? 13:04:41 #link https://pagure.io/fedora-workstation/issue/25 13:04:55 we'll have some open floor after this where we can hit anything missed 13:05:09 I have a topic myself 13:05:51 So I'll split this proposal in two. First should be uncontroversial: I want to add gnome-todo and simple-scan to the default install. We actually agreed a while back that I can do this without coming back here for permission, since they are new GNOME apps, but I figure it never hurts to ask. 13:05:56 *new core apps 13:06:06 mcatanzaro: So IIUC from the ticket, Music and Simple Scan are the ones that would be added, correct? 13:06:18 sorry, and ToDO 13:06:31 To Do, Music, and Simple Scan. Music is the second part of the proposal. That one we previously had some reservations about. 13:06:36 The goal is to replace Rhythmbox with Music 13:06:51 * ryanlerch is surprised that simple scan was not already default 13:06:59 for what it's worth, I think we should always discuss before adding new top level apps 13:07:01 * stickster too, I've been using that for years 13:07:02 ryanlerch: It was several years ago 13:07:33 I think it was removed... to save space in the image? Don't remember for sure why. Anyway we don't have a hard size constraint anymore. 13:07:41 hi 13:07:43 sorry I am late 13:07:47 Hi juhp! 13:07:59 mcatanzaro: I haven't looked at simple-scan recently - did it actually get the facelift that Allan worked on ? 13:08:02 We are discussing whether to add To Do, Music, and Simple Scan as default apps. 13:08:27 #chair juhp 13:08:28 Current chairs: juhp kalev mcatanzaro mclasen ryanlerch stickster 13:08:34 mclasen: I don't think so, but it already got a GNOME 3 facelift a couple years back, so I don't think we need to block on that. 13:08:42 It lets you scan things. ;) 13:09:36 mclasen: yeah, it def looks like aday has been involved with it 13:09:45 * ryanlerch used it this morning 13:09:55 * stickster is solid +1 on ToDo and Scan, haven't looked at Music in a while though 13:10:09 I think I'd like to ask Allan for guidance if we should install these in the default install. With gnome-software search provider being enabled, we don't really need to install all of the world's apps by default. 13:10:42 there was a bunch of redesign-related commits in simple-scan this cycle 13:10:57 so, hopefully in good shape 13:11:13 mclasen: I really don't know. We decided to move it to core before Allan came out with the redesign. 13:11:34 Right after Ubuntu announced they were switching to gnome-shell, I asked Robert if he'd be interested in moving to GNOME infrastructure... and he was. 13:12:15 * kalev asked aday to join here. 13:12:25 to me, these three are useful apps to have installed in a default image -- not just available via a download 13:12:36 kalev: If you're curious about future plans you should look at the last paragraph of https://blogs.gnome.org/mcatanzaro/2017/08/13/gnome-3-26-core-applications/. We're not planning to add many more applications besides Credentials... at least not without removing some. 13:12:53 not sure how many people use workstation without a (or good) internet connection 13:13:00 aday[m]: hey, thanks for joining 13:13:06 np 13:13:12 http://imgur.com/a/bCUok 13:13:21 #link https://blogs.gnome.org/mcatanzaro/2017/08/13/gnome-3-26-core-applications/ 13:13:49 mclasen: i need to speak to robert about that half blue button :/ 13:13:50 aday[m]: we're having a Workstation WG meeting here and discussing whether to (1) add To Do and Simple Scan to the default install, and (2) replace Rhythmbox with Music 13:13:53 before lapo kills me 13:14:02 mclasen: How did you do that... you hooked up your scanner to webcam input? :) 13:14:28 #chair otaylor 13:14:28 Current chairs: juhp kalev mcatanzaro mclasen otaylor ryanlerch stickster 13:15:36 mcatanzaro: it still offers to use your webcam 13:16:03 We should probably ask Robert to make it not do that? 13:16:29 simple scan makes sense to me, although i wonder whether it would be better to give it a generic name if it's going to be included by default 13:16:35 I mean we don't want Cheese to be redundant with Simple Scan, right? :D I've never seen that before but I always have a scanner hooked up when I open it, so.... 13:16:36 i'm less convinced by to do 13:17:23 aday[m]: I wish we had included you in the core app conversation when we had it a few months ago. :( 13:18:21 My logic with To Do was pretty simple: most people probably keep a To Do list somewhere, and the app is actually very nice for that, so it seems to have general appeal. 13:18:49 * rdieter waves late, sorry, hi 13:18:50 And nobody objected when I proposed it, but I probably only asked release team since it was a moduleset decision.... 13:18:56 (Sorry.) 13:19:00 * ryanlerch cant even dinf to do in gnome-software 13:19:14 I think both Scan and ToDo make sense in the domain of a workstation; Music does too but that's for the next part of this discussion 13:19:28 ryanlerch: weird, it came right up for me in a shell search 13:19:56 oh, it must have been downloading something, its popped up now 13:20:03 ah, cool 13:20:04 ryanlerch: The search in Software is not very good... it is in there for me when I look on the Installed page, but the search does not find it even if I search for the exact app name "To Do" 13:20:07 using a to do app is a bit specialised in my mind 13:20:21 hi rdieter 13:20:40 vs. something like Google Keep? 13:20:41 * mcatanzaro also wishes he did not just publish the core apps blog post last night 13:20:47 there is also many to-do apps, so having a good default might be a good thing too 13:20:49 #chair rdieter 13:20:50 Current chairs: juhp kalev mcatanzaro mclasen otaylor rdieter ryanlerch stickster 13:21:05 I wasn't expecting the choice to be questioned... it would have been so easy to reverse until yesterday. Sorry. :( 13:21:12 * stickster is putting a timer on this discussion, 10 minutes left 13:21:12 it is also something that may be of higher interest to the Workstation target user 13:21:38 i'm +1 for all 3 apps in question here 13:21:40 calendar, email, calculator, notes are all standard apps. to do not so much 13:22:05 mcatanzaro: I think it's one thing to have an upstream "good quality apps" lists (aka core apps) but it's somewhat orthogonal to whether we should install them by default 13:22:17 aday[m]: Interesting! Because I wonder what is the utility of a notes app when you have a nicer organized To Do app? :) 13:22:29 on a more basic level, to do is very much a personal project rather than something that the design team is actively involved in 13:22:33 I'd rather install a subset of the good quality apps and have some installable through the software center 13:22:39 Anyway I will make sure to consult aday[m] on any changes to the core apps list in the future. 13:22:59 mcatanzaro: aday[m]: I wonder whether it would make sense to converge todo/notes in the future 13:23:06 that's an upstream question, really 13:23:09 I haven't tried To Do but I think "to do" is an important tool 13:23:42 stickster: ah 13:23:45 stickster: maybe, although i think to do is probably more powerful than you'd want it to be as a part of notes - it has scheduling capabilities and so on 13:24:28 aday[m]: I think OneNote is popular on Windows, but that's because it's targeted at touch input. Our Notes app is keyboard input. 13:24:44 in any case... Do I understand that we're agreed on simple-scan? 13:24:54 Touch input Notes would no doubt be very useful (for touchscreen users). 13:24:57 #proposed #agreed add Simple Scan to default workstation (please vote 13:25:01 +1 13:25:02 +1 13:25:10 +1 13:25:17 +1 as per aday[m]'s recommendation 13:25:18 +1 13:25:22 i'd suggest renaming it to Document Scanner 13:25:29 *noted 13:25:38 aday[m]: I had a conversation with Robert about that too. We did not think of that option. 13:25:45 aday[m]: that is an upstream change though, right? 13:25:58 aday[m]: He did not want it to be named Scanner because he was worried users might confuse the concept of the app with the actual physical device. 13:26:09 But I think he will be receptive if you suggest the name change to him. 13:26:17 Oh wait, actually we did think of that option. :/ 13:26:34 His concern was that it can be used to scan both documents AND images. Pictures. You wouldn't think of those as documents. 13:26:37 rdieter: juhp: mclasen: any vote here? 13:26:45 not sure ryanlerch. it happens in other cases; although whether that's a good thing i'm not sure 13:26:46 +1 13:27:03 +1 13:27:38 #agreed add Simple Scan to default workstation (+1: 7, 0: 0, -1: 0) 13:27:50 I can make it happen in comps 13:28:00 #action kalev add Simple Scan to comps 13:28:07 Thanks kalev! It goes in gnome-desktop, not workstation-product. 13:28:16 right 13:28:30 #action mcatanzaro work with upstream on naming issue; we can adapt as needed 13:28:54 kalev: Also be sure to add and commented out if we decide not to approve them so we can track our divergence from upstream. 13:29:11 So what about To Do? It sounds less clear about consensus there. 13:29:17 Indeed 13:29:39 I'm -1 as per aday[m]'s comments 13:29:48 +1 from me 13:30:43 +1 here 13:30:45 Honestly I could go either way... I still see it as useful. But it certainly doesn't need to be there. It's really hard to backtrack one day after announcing it though and it won't harm anything, so +1. 13:31:18 0 from me (partly because I missed the discussion - sorry for being late!) 13:31:25 I'm trying to use it currently 13:31:41 it has some rough edges, but it is clearly a useful app 13:32:17 yes 13:32:19 mclasen: The only part I don't like is that adding a priority to an event is very awkward... but no less awkward than adding a time to an event in Calendar (which is nuts BTW). 13:32:23 if we don't install it by default, we should make it a featured app in gnome-software I think 13:32:41 kalev: that's a good tradeoff, thanks 13:33:04 kalev: Just like we should do with Firefox :) 13:33:32 mcatanzaro: that doesn't make sense because we install firefox by default 13:33:33 mcatanzaro: adding a date to a task is also one click too many - I always want dates on my tasks 13:33:49 kalev: I think he was making a GNOME Web 1/2-joke :-) 13:33:51 kalev: It was a joke. I'm just saying what we *should* do with it. ;) ;) 13:33:59 *jinx 13:34:01 :) 13:34:05 got it now! :) 13:34:20 OK, so missing opinions here from many people and we need to get done with this topic. 13:34:22 mclasen: OK, I don't use that, but true. 13:34:44 "useful" shouldn't be a qualification for an app being preinstalled 13:35:08 mclasen: juhp: rdieter: any votes? 13:35:30 +1 13:35:44 +1 13:37:07 #agreed Add To Do to default apps (+1: 5, 0: 1, -1: 1) 13:37:08 aday[m]: Right... I like the "general appeal" criterion more than "useful." Wish we had had this conversation earlier. :/ 13:37:33 * mcatanzaro having second thoughts but will stand by +1 13:37:42 -1 13:37:47 #undo 13:37:48 Removing item from minutes: AGREED by stickster at 13:37:07 : Add To Do to default apps (+1: 5, 0: 1, -1: 1) 13:37:48 OK, stickster should we move on to Music or do you need the time for your next agenda point? 13:37:51 #agreed Add To Do to default apps (+1: 5, 0: 1, -1: 2) 13:38:11 mcatanzaro: I see your point about getting Music in because it won't get an audience without more visibility 13:38:30 Basic functionality seems to be there, and as we all know RB is *super* long in the tooth 13:39:28 However, we are short on time because I have another item to cover which is readiness of Changes in F27 13:39:41 OK then 13:40:00 So unless everyone is ready to just vote right now, we're going to have to either defer this to #fedora-workstation for more discussion (or list), or vote *right now* 13:40:15 oops, single line entry makes it hard to be cogent without more caffeine 13:40:28 So unless everyone is ready to just vote right now, we're going to have to either defer this to #fedora-workstation for more discussion (or list), or put it away until F28 13:41:02 +1? :) 13:41:05 lol 13:41:06 * mclasen suggests to defer it so we can actually try the current music before voting 13:41:08 +1 13:41:14 Let's defer to next meeting. 13:41:26 okies 13:41:37 We'll still have plenty of time before F27 to change out one app. 13:41:57 mcatanzaro: I'll suggest we try to get consensus *before* that meeting since the 28th a number of us will be traveling to Flock 13:42:07 FWIW I use Music on a regular basis and it's... mostly fine. Rough edges. Better than Rhythmbox. 13:42:07 mcatanzaro: we could use the ticket to vote on Music IMHO 13:42:22 aday[m]: what's your opinion on Music vs Rhythmbox? 13:42:26 stickster: Oh that's right... should we just cancel the meeting on the 28th then? 13:42:27 mcatanzaro: RB has plenty of rough edges still, I think, so that doesn't seem like a deal-killer 13:42:41 mcatanzaro: We might have to. So that makes it important for us to get the discussion done elsewhere for Music 13:43:16 #action mcatanzaro Drive discussion/vote on Music for default this week (-ish) so we can get decided 13:43:41 #action stickster figure out whether to cancel Aug 28th WG meeting 13:43:49 TBH from a strategic perspective, I feel like the odds of this being approved decrease if we put discussion on the list. :) 13:43:49 #topic All other business -- open floor 13:43:54 mcatanzaro: i obviously want us to move in the direction of music. i'm not entirely sure where the development effort is at currently, though 13:44:00 mcatanzaro: spotify here :-/ 13:44:02 I would just wait for the next meeting. Anyway next topic. 13:44:08 is anyone actually working on Music upstream now? it seemed rather abandoned a year ago or so 13:44:31 OK, here's an important point, Changes for F27. They must be code complete by *September 5* which is the Tuesday after Flock, also the day after Labor Day holiday in USA 13:45:06 I've already deferred the installer change to F28 since I didn't notice the testable deadline until it had already passed during GUADEC, and wasn't going to work on it then. 13:45:07 If memory serves, we have some Changes in the Workstation area that should really already be testable, but actually completed by then 13:45:26 mcatanzaro: Ah, yes -- so noted 13:45:28 I don't remember what other changes we have lined up. 13:46:11 there's the Flatpak in koji change 13:46:15 It was agreed at the fesco meeting that we'd make the call on the flatpak building change 3 days before the deadline (sep 2) 13:46:34 and the atomic variant 13:47:08 otaylor: OK, that's a Saturday then? 13:47:19 #link https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Graphical_Applications_as_Flatpaks 13:48:22 stickster: yeah - not sure why sgallagher proposed that exact day - but anyways "right after flock" more or less 13:48:55 I don't see any others in the list at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/27/ChangeSet that look Workstation specific other than the one mcatanzaro mentioned (reduce initial-setup redundancy) 13:49:51 otaylor: is the "remove this change" outcome really more like just a delay on the capability, no scramble required to remove something else? 13:50:02 or is there some other backing-out change that needs to be coordinated? 13:50:17 There's nothing that needs to be backed out, no. 13:50:31 right, that's what I expected. thanks 13:50:44 OK, so it sounds like we're not missing anything else to be tracked here, then. 13:50:54 * stickster is EOF on this topic then 13:51:40 #info Anaconda coordination is deferred to F28, otaylor is tracking the flatpak change which will be assessed 2017-Sep-02 13:51:59 Anything else we need to cover here? If not, mcatanzaro can always dive back into Music ;-) 13:52:11 +1 Music! Woooo! 13:52:17 +1 music 13:52:56 ol 13:53:03 RB is the current default, right? 13:53:10 ryanlerch: correct 13:53:17 this proposal is to replace RB with gnome-music 13:53:36 still a +1 from me :D 13:53:46 so would the default helper for music files be totem or rhythmobx? 13:54:25 otaylor: is that because music cant just play a one-off file? 13:54:29 otaylor: totem 13:54:41 becuase it is all tracker-based? 13:54:49 I see 13:54:52 We'd be removing Rhythmbox 13:54:56 ryanlerch: I'm just wondering the situation, since it used to be rhythmbox 13:55:08 ryanlerch: Well that's not some limitation of tracker, it's a flaw in the app itself. It should learn how to open music files.... 13:55:30 In the meantime, we would have those files open in totem instead by default 13:55:34 mcatanzaro: yeah, sorry i worded that wrong 13:55:46 *But* that's actually not a very bad regression! Because that's actually what you want to do now with Rhythmbox, too! 13:55:54 otaylor, mcatanzaro: we have designs for music to be able to open audio files 13:56:02 aha 13:56:08 mcatanzaro: agreed, the single-file experience with RB as default is ugh 13:56:08 Currently if you open an audio file in Rhythmbox it gets added to your music library, which is almost never what you want 13:56:24 4mins! 13:56:36 So we really want music files to open in Totem regardless of whether we have Music or Rhythmbox right now. And in the glorious future, hopefully Music will handle that better. 13:57:03 (If we keep Rhythmbox then we should ask hadess to make totem the default audio file handler anyway.) 13:57:28 i've been using music for ages now, and IMHO it is better and more stable than RB 13:57:31 FWIW 13:57:37 mcatanzaro: so what's the development situation with gnome-music at the moment? 13:57:40 the one big lack I see in Music atm is accessing network music share. So my huge 75000 song library is now missing and no way I can see to get to it :-) 13:57:56 ryanlerch: I think music has the same issue (with library vs random files) ? 13:58:33 otaylor: "Lightly maintained" ;) 13:58:58 hrm 13:59:08 Well we are out of time, we will have to discuss at next month's meeting. I'd rather not move this to the list; we'll just see where we're at come next meeting. It's hardly urgent. 14:00:03 mcatanzaro: maybe the ticket tracker might be a better place to get concensus 14:01:04 agreed 14:01:19 OK, we'll wrap things up for today. juhp and ryanlerch, thanks for staying up late :-) 14:01:37 #agreed continue Music discussion elsewhere, check WG temp next time 14:01:44 Thanks for coming, everyone 14:01:46 #endmeeting