#fedora-meeting-2: F27 Beta Go/No-Go meeting
Meeting started by jkurik at 17:00:29 UTC
(full logs).
Meeting summary
- Roll Call (jkurik, 17:01:13)
- Purpose of this meeting (jkurik, 17:05:57)
- Purpose of this meeting is to check whether or
not F27 Beta is ready for shipment, according to the release
criteria. (jkurik,
17:05:59)
- This is determined in a few ways: (jkurik,
17:06:10)
- * No remaining blocker bugs (jkurik,
17:06:11)
- * Release candidate compose is available
(jkurik,
17:06:13)
- * Test matrices for Beta are fully
completed (jkurik,
17:06:14)
- Current status (jkurik, 17:06:21)
- https://pagure.io/Fedora-Council/tickets/issue/141
(jkurik,
17:07:05)
- The RC for F27 Beta is not yet ready due to
present blockers (jkurik,
17:10:15)
- https://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/milestone/27/beta/buglist
- F27 Blockers (jkurik,
17:10:17)
- As we have no RC there are subsequently no Test
Matrices for the F27 Beta RC (jkurik,
17:10:27)
- we are skipping the Mini blocker review
(jkurik,
17:16:02)
- please vote in the bugs (dgilmore,
17:16:28)
- As there is no RC and no Test Matrices, we are
skipping Test Matrices coverage review as well (jkurik,
17:16:43)
- Go/No-Go decision (jkurik, 17:17:02)
- ACTION: jkurik to
publish the Go/No-Go result (jkurik,
17:19:53)
- ACTION: jkurik to
organize second round of Go/No-Go meeting for F27 Beta on Thursday,
September 21st at 17:00UTC (jkurik,
17:19:55)
- AGREED: Due to
missing RC for the F27 Beta release and presence of blocker bugs,
the decision is “No Go”. The Beta release slips for one week however
due to “Rain date” feature for the Beta we are not going to slip the
Final GA. (jkurik,
17:20:20)
- Open floor (jkurik, 17:20:29)
- Mini-Blocker Review (jkurik, 17:23:54)
- https://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/milestone/27/beta/buglist
(jkurik,
17:23:56)
- (1491333) kickstart installations using autopart fail with 'Kickstart insufficient' (adamw, 17:25:15)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1491333
(adamw,
17:25:15)
- Proposed Blocker, anaconda, POST (adamw,
17:25:16)
- AGREED: 1491333 -
AcceptedBlocker (Beta) - violates "The installer must be able to
complete a scripted installation which duplicates the default
interactive installation as closely as possible" and "Any
installation method or process designed to run unattended must do
so. There should be no prompts requiring user intervention" from the
Alpha criteria (adamw,
17:28:22)
- (1477916) Workstation boot.iso is 1.8 GB, seems to be ostree iso (adamw, 17:28:29)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1477916
(adamw,
17:28:29)
- Proposed Blocker, distribution, NEW
(adamw,
17:28:29)
- AGREED: 1477916 -
AcceptedFreezeException (Beta) - we're still wrangling about whether
this technically violates any criteria, but everyone's OK with
giving it a freeze exception and hoping it goes away by
Monday. (adamw,
17:34:17)
- (1490832) dnf system-upgrade: dnf.exceptions.MarkingError: no package matched (adamw, 17:34:38)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1490832
(adamw,
17:34:38)
- Proposed Blocker, dnf-plugin-system-upgrade,
NEW (adamw,
17:34:39)
- AGREED: 1490832 -
AcceptedFreezeException (Beta), punt (delay decision) on blocker
status - we're missing quite a bit of info here (how common this is,
does it just work if you try again, etc), but we've seen at least
enough to grant a freeze exception (adamw,
17:42:42)
- (1491053) Firefox reports insecure TLS configuration when visiting FreeIPA web UI after standard server deployment (adamw, 17:42:52)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1491053
(adamw,
17:42:52)
- Proposed Blocker, freeipa, NEW (adamw,
17:42:53)
- AGREED: 1491053 -
AcceptedFreezeException (Beta), punt (delay decision) on blocker
status - we're not yet sure of the cause for this or how easy it is
to workaround, so we cannot make a blocker decision. It's clearly a
case for a freeze exception, however. (adamw,
18:00:44)
- (1491056) FreeIPA enrolment via kickstart fails (adamw, 18:00:53)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1491056
(adamw,
18:00:53)
- Proposed Blocker, freeipa, MODIFIED
(adamw,
18:00:53)
- AGREED: 1491056 -
AcceptedBlocker (Beta) - clearly violates "It must be possible to
join the system to a FreeIPA or Active Directory domain at install
time and post-install, and the system must respect the identity,
authentication and access control configuration provided by the
domain" (adamw,
18:04:27)
- (1490072) Program terminated with signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. #0 0x00007f16279aa68f in _cogl_boxed_value_set_x () from /usr/lib64/mutter/libmutter-cogl-1.so (adamw, 18:04:39)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1490072
(adamw,
18:04:40)
- Proposed Blocker, gnome-shell, POST
(adamw,
18:04:40)
- AGREED: 1490072 -
AcceptedBlocker (Beta) - conditional violation of "The release must
be able host virtual guest instances of the same release", this bug
means you're very likely to crash your GNOME session when trying to
do this on GNOME (adamw,
18:10:21)
- (1490895) kernel crash when trying upgrade VM to F27 (adamw, 18:10:54)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1490895
(adamw,
18:10:54)
- Proposed Blocker, kernel, NEW (adamw,
18:10:54)
- AGREED: 1490895 -
RejectedBlocker (Beta), AcceptedFreezeException (Beta) - this looks
to be the same as #1462381, and is specific to VMs using the 'qxl'
driver and can be easily worked around by disabling graphical boot.
On that basis it's rejected as a blocker but accepted as an
FE (adamw,
18:15:47)
- (1489862) There is FW Raid set, but there is no /dev/md* device (adamw, 18:15:49)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1489862
(adamw,
18:15:49)
- Proposed Blocker, selinux-policy, ON_QA
(adamw,
18:15:49)
- AGREED: 1489862 -
RejectedBlocker (Beta) AcceptedFreezeException (Beta) - per current
information this works with SELinux in permissive mode, so it likely
works on the non-live installer images and can easily be worked
around for live installs with 'enforcing=0' (adamw,
18:18:50)
- (1491508) FreeIPA server deployment fails with SELinux in enforcing mode, despite no obvious denials (adamw, 18:18:50)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1491508
(adamw,
18:18:50)
- Proposed Blocker, selinux-policy,
ASSIGNED (adamw,
18:18:51)
- AGREED: 1491508 -
AcceptedBlocker (Beta) - once again, violates "Release-blocking
roles and the supported role configuration interfaces must meet the
core functional Role Definition Requirements to the extent that
supported roles can be successfully deployed, started..." for the
blocking 'domain controller' role (adamw,
18:22:43)
- (1491459) shim.efi missing from EFI partition, causes upgraded systems not to boot (adamw, 18:22:49)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1491459
(adamw,
18:22:49)
- Proposed Blocker, shim-signed, MODIFIED
(adamw,
18:22:50)
- AGREED: 1491459 -
AcceptedBlocker (Beta) - violates the upgrade criteria for upgrades
of UEFI installs (upgraded system may well not boot) (adamw,
18:26:36)
- that's all the blockers (adamw,
18:26:50)
- we have a bunch of proposed FEs too, but we
don't really have time to go over those (adamw,
18:27:00)
- Open floor (jkurik, 18:28:44)
Meeting ended at 18:30:45 UTC
(full logs).
Action items
- jkurik to publish the Go/No-Go result
- jkurik to organize second round of Go/No-Go meeting for F27 Beta on Thursday, September 21st at 17:00UTC
Action items, by person
- jkurik
- jkurik to publish the Go/No-Go result
- jkurik to organize second round of Go/No-Go meeting for F27 Beta on Thursday, September 21st at 17:00UTC
People present (lines said)
- adamw (165)
- jkurik (93)
- sgallagh (63)
- nirik (37)
- dgilmore (31)
- sumantrom[m] (19)
- roshi (14)
- zodbot (14)
- Southern_Gentlem (13)
- mboddu (5)
- Kellin (3)
- bowlofeggs (2)
- mattdm (1)
- nb (1)
Generated by MeetBot 0.1.4.