18:00:16 <geppetto> #startmeeting fpc
18:00:16 <zodbot> Meeting started Wed Feb 21 18:00:16 2018 UTC.  The chair is geppetto. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
18:00:16 <zodbot> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #halp #info #idea #link #topic.
18:00:16 <zodbot> The meeting name has been set to 'fpc'
18:00:16 <geppetto> #meetingname fpc
18:00:16 <geppetto> #topic Roll Call
18:00:16 <zodbot> The meeting name has been set to 'fpc'
18:00:31 <orionp> hello
18:00:39 <geppetto> #chair orionp
18:00:39 <zodbot> Current chairs: geppetto orionp
18:00:42 * limburgher here
18:00:46 <geppetto> #chair limburgher
18:00:46 <zodbot> Current chairs: geppetto limburgher orionp
18:02:41 * Rathann semi-here
18:03:29 <geppetto> #chair Rathann
18:03:29 <zodbot> Current chairs: Rathann geppetto limburgher orionp
18:05:30 <lorbus> .hello2
18:05:30 <zodbot> lorbus: lorbus 'Christian Glombek' <c@petersen-glombek.de>
18:07:53 <mbooth> Hallo
18:07:57 <geppetto> #chair mbooth
18:07:57 <zodbot> Current chairs: Rathann geppetto limburgher mbooth orionp
18:08:03 <geppetto> Ok, that's 5.
18:10:41 <geppetto> #topic Schedule
18:10:43 <geppetto> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/packaging@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/OASC4FXNZQD3GONPZD3GBUZO4WA7SPVY/
18:10:55 <geppetto> #topic #741 Clarify the PyPI URL template
18:11:01 <geppetto> .fpc 741
18:11:04 <zodbot> geppetto: Issue #741: Clarify the PyPI URL template. - packaging-committee - Pagure - https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/issue/741
18:13:33 <mbooth> Eh, I'm fine with any of these suggestions
18:13:36 <Rathann> I'm fine with either, too
18:13:59 <Rathann> but prefer the second, smaller one
18:15:07 <geppetto> Yeh, I'm +1 on adding magic somewhere so this just works … I don't really care where the magic happens, or how
18:15:29 <geppetto> The later seems nicer, but ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
18:18:54 <mbooth> Well if someone wants to add a macro, I'm happy with that too
18:21:56 <Rathann> so, shall we update the guidelines with the second proposal and also update the example spec with Igor's suggestion?
18:22:07 <geppetto> Sure, +1
18:23:01 <mbooth> Seems reasonable +1
18:23:07 <Rathann> +1
18:24:02 <Rathann> limburgher, orionp ?
18:25:07 <orionp> sorry, +1
18:28:23 <geppetto> limburgher: ?
18:32:44 <Rathann> shall we record the votes in the ticket and move on?
18:33:52 <geppetto> bah
18:34:03 <geppetto> #topic #745 Don't use %{__python}, %{python_sitelib/arch} unredefined
18:34:08 <geppetto> .fpc 745
18:34:10 <zodbot> geppetto: Issue #745: Don't use %{__python}, %{python_sitelib}, and %{python_sitearch} unless redefined - packaging-committee - Pagure - https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/issue/745
18:35:26 <geppetto> This seems fine now
18:35:32 <geppetto> just a time moves on thing, I think
18:35:35 <geppetto> +1
18:36:21 <geppetto> Anyone else?
18:36:31 <mbooth> So this just seems like updating the guidelines to reflect the truth
18:36:37 <mbooth> Am I right?
18:36:39 <geppetto> yeh
18:36:48 <mbooth> Then I am +1
18:36:55 <geppetto> Just that the truth changed since we last touched this bit of the guidelines
18:37:33 <Rathann> +1
18:37:38 <mbooth> That's fine -- It's good that people are actively checking the truthiness of the guidelines :-)
18:37:50 * geppetto nods
18:37:50 <orionp> +1
18:37:59 <geppetto> #action  Don't use %{__python}, etc. (+1:4, 0:0, -1:0)
18:38:11 <geppetto> Ok, assuming limburgher still isn't around.
18:38:20 <geppetto> #topic #751 Packaging:Guidelines#Noarch_with_Unported... is outdated
18:38:24 <geppetto> .fpc 751
18:38:26 <zodbot> geppetto: Issue #751: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Noarch_with_Unported_Dependencies is outdated - packaging-committee - Pagure - https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/issue/751
18:39:11 <geppetto> +1
18:40:23 <mbooth> This makes sense, another truthiness update, +1
18:40:39 <Rathann> does this actually work?
18:40:51 <Rathann> I have one such package
18:41:10 <Rathann> and I'm still getting broken deps reports
18:41:24 <geppetto> I asssumed tibbs was correct
18:41:27 <geppetto> I haven't checked it
18:41:45 <geppetto> I also vaguely recalled that it was supposed to get fixed in koji
18:42:01 <Rathann> ok
18:42:12 <Rathann> I'll have to re-check, then
18:42:27 <Rathann> if it's a recent thing
18:42:38 <mbooth> I just assumed tibbs was right too, but do check if you have doubts
18:42:46 <mbooth> Update us in the ticket :-)
18:42:47 <Rathann> does anyone have a koji ticket for reference?
18:42:53 <Rathann> oh
18:42:57 <Rathann> will do
18:43:08 <mbooth> Cool
18:43:29 <mbooth> I'm afraid I have to bow out early
18:43:46 <mbooth> There are circumstances happening
18:44:17 <mbooth> But I'm +1 to tibbs' change if it's correct
18:44:21 <mbooth> See you next time
18:44:33 * geppetto nods
18:44:47 <geppetto> I'm going to close after this ticket anyway
18:45:25 <geppetto> Rathann: The ticket seems to imply it was fixed a year ago: https://pagure.io/koji/issue/19
18:45:34 <geppetto> might have been a bit after that before it hit the builders
18:46:02 <limburgher> Sorry, unexpected AFK.
18:46:03 <limburgher> REading.
18:46:37 <limburgher> 745 +1
18:47:08 <limburgher> I think that's all atm, yes?
18:47:33 <geppetto> limburgher: 741
18:47:55 <geppetto> In theory also 751 … but that isn't anywhere close +4, so doesn't really matter
18:48:11 <geppetto> #topic Open Floor
18:48:17 <limburgher> Right.
18:48:32 <geppetto> #action  Don't use %{__python}, etc. (+1:5, 0:0, -1:0)
18:49:36 <geppetto> limburgher: You reading 741 (the pypi ticket)?
18:51:19 <limburgher> Yes
18:52:12 <limburgher> +1
18:52:44 <geppetto> #action  Clarify the PyPI URL template (+1:5, 0:0, -1:0)
18:53:40 <geppetto> #action Rathann Going to investigate koji noarch/exclusive arch bugfix is actually fixed.
18:53:57 <Rathann> yup
18:53:58 <geppetto> Ok, see you all next week.
18:54:02 <Rathann> thanks
18:54:06 <geppetto> #endmeeting