13:00:50 #startmeeting FAW SIG 13:00:50 Meeting started Mon Apr 30 13:00:50 2018 UTC. The chair is mclasen. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 13:00:50 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #halp #info #idea #link #topic. 13:00:50 The meeting name has been set to 'faw_sig' 13:01:08 #topic Roll call 13:01:42 might be low turnout today, since we are in super-long-weekend territory 13:01:44 * jsmith lurks 13:01:47 .hello jlebon 13:01:48 jlebon: jlebon 'None' 13:01:54 .hello miabbott 13:01:55 miabbott: miabbott 'Micah Abbott' 13:02:01 wheee for once i didn't miss it! 13:03:24 lets see if we can find a few more people 13:04:01 owen is moving, sanja is busy. that leaves kalev, who I don't see on irc right now 13:05:13 ok, so lets see what we can do today 13:05:46 there's two tickets tagged for meeting. any other topics to add to the agenda ? 13:07:03 doesn't look like it, so lets roll with we have 13:07:36 .hello2 13:07:37 dustymabe: dustymabe 'Dusty Mabe' 13:07:43 #topic Make Atomic Workstation available on getfedora.org https://pagure.io/fedora-atomic-workstation/issue/13 13:07:57 this one is just informational, I think 13:08:20 +1 13:08:26 I did create a mockup for this a while ago, and supposedly that has been merged into the website 13:08:33 nice! 13:08:36 I've checked a few times, but it is not live yet 13:08:44 👍 13:09:08 I assume it'll get switched out at release time, so no way to see in advance... 13:09:25 but I will check tomorrow and close the ticket then 13:09:56 #action Matthias will close the ticket when FAW appears on getfedora.org 13:10:49 moving on to the next topic 13:11:08 #topic rebrand atomic workstation https://pagure.io/fedora-atomic-workstation/issue/19 13:11:28 I filed this to follow up on the naming discussion from last time 13:11:52 so, it is mainly informational as well 13:12:39 mclasen: +1 13:12:55 after the brainstorming last time, sanja and I spent more time sorting through lots of candidates, checking for twitter+domain availability 13:12:58 * dustymabe still likes Atomic Workstation :) - but onwards and upwards 13:13:11 atomic is dead; long live atomic 13:13:24 there's a spreadsheet with a long list of candidates, if anybody is interested in it 13:13:37 mclasen: i am! 13:13:53 in the end, we settled on a single candidate that we are going forward with now 13:14:22 and... drumroll... it is 'Silverblue', or 'Team Silverblue' 13:14:52 🎉 13:15:54 we've done quite a bit of groundwork on this already, including legal vetting, obtaining twitter / domain / github, starting a website,.. 13:16:01 ahh cool! didn't realize it was already settled 13:16:22 let me put some links here, for reference 13:16:39 #link https://github.com/teamsilverblue/ 13:16:57 #link https://twitter.com/teamsilverblue 13:17:12 #link http://www.teamsilverblue.org/ 13:17:54 there will be a bigger, splashier announcement to the public, correct? 13:18:03 yes, sure 13:18:54 the next step is to take this to the fedora council 13:19:11 and get the website looking reasonable 13:19:18 then we can do a more public announcement 13:19:52 congrats on the new name and the bright future ahead! 13:20:16 we have a document to send to the fedora council - should appear on the council mailing list very soon 13:20:32 indeed, congratulations! 13:20:49 so, I talked a lot. comments and feedback welcome 13:21:13 so, what would be examples of repos stored under the teamsilverblue github namespace? 13:21:28 #info Sanja and Matthias will take this to the Fedora Council, as the next step 13:22:11 for now, just the website and docs that we might produce. But we could also host the pet container tool there, when we get around to writing it 13:24:11 gotcha 13:24:49 jebon: I shared the name spreadsheet with you 13:25:44 how (not) separate is this from Fedora itself? is this mostly just about renaming "Fedora Atomic Workstation" to "Fedora Silverblue"? 13:26:36 this is not separate from Fedora at all, anymore, at this point. It is an initiative within Fedora 13:27:17 it would be better if Fedora accompanied the name in most official wording cases 13:27:22 Fedora Silverblue 13:27:35 but in casual conversations it's just "Silverblue" 13:27:38 understood 13:27:51 I guess time will tell how that plays out, but the mission statement that we have put in the document fro the council is to go the last mile for making FAW feature-parity with the regular workstation and have it be the preferred variation by F30 13:27:54 so the website would be fedorasilverblue.org 13:28:18 whoa, that's interesting 13:29:12 I mean, we should have some ambitious goals, otherwise, why do it... 13:29:29 the other side of the coin is that we can interest non-Fedora folks in getting involved in this project if 'Fedora' is not part of the name 13:29:38 sure, we are definitely targeting Fedora's largest user base here 13:29:54 so that's why it seemed interesting 13:29:58 i think it's a good thing 13:30:05 the way we currently think about the naming is that teamsilverblue is the name for the project of doing this polish work, and when we get to flip the switch to make it the preferred variant, we can evaluate renaming it to Fedora Silverblue 13:30:08 there are definitely some gaps to be closed, but let's do it 13:30:27 or something else 13:30:42 ehh, would mostly be better if it started as Fedora Silverblue, not really easy to change things later IMHO 13:30:47 * miabbott cringes at the thought of coming up with a 'something else' name 13:30:55 and yes, opening this up to non-Fedora users was certainly a motivation in this, from the beginning 13:31:06 which is why the 'outside of fedora' option was in play in the first place 13:31:10 and believe me, it's much easier to make things happen in Fedora if the project you are working on has "Fedora" in the name 13:31:53 spoken as a true Project Atomic member :-/ 13:31:59 non-Fedora, like other distributions? 13:32:25 non-Fedora as in people who would not currently consider installing Fedora Workstation, for whatever reasons 13:34:49 k, as in a user audience 13:35:00 yes, exactly 13:37:04 all of this of course is also somewhat entangled with future developments on the atomic and coreos side 13:38:00 but we figured it is better to move ahead and adapt than to wait forever 13:40:36 alright, if there is no further comments on this topic for now, I guess we can move to open floor 13:40:40 #topic Open floor 13:41:07 anything to bring up ? 13:42:04 just one observation from me: tomorrow is release day - I have no idea if this has any practical effect on atomic deliverables, other than having an installer .iso for it 13:43:48 dustymabe: ^ ? 13:45:45 mclasen: bunch of us are in standup now 13:46:02 alright then. time to close this one 13:46:42 one other observation though: i'll be traveling in two weeks, so somebody else will have to chair the meeting 13:46:59 we can sort it out on the list 13:47:14 #info Matthias will not be around for the next meeting in 2 weeks 13:47:30 with that, 13:47:34 #endmeeting