15:00:20 <pwhalen> #startmeeting Fedora ARM and AArch64 Status Meeting
15:00:20 <zodbot> Meeting started Tue May 28 15:00:20 2019 UTC.
15:00:20 <zodbot> This meeting is logged and archived in a public location.
15:00:20 <zodbot> The chair is pwhalen. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
15:00:20 <zodbot> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #halp #info #idea #link #topic.
15:00:20 <zodbot> The meeting name has been set to 'fedora_arm_and_aarch64_status_meeting'
15:00:28 <pwhalen> good morning folks, who's here today?
15:01:25 * tdawson is here.
15:02:14 * jlinton waves
15:02:39 * pbrobinson o/
15:03:34 <pwhalen> alright, lets start
15:03:38 <pwhalen> #topic 1) ==== Userspace Status  ====
15:04:01 <pwhalen> anyone seeing new issues?
15:04:31 <pwhalen> #info dnf.exceptions.Error: Incorrect or unknown "arch": armv7hcnl
15:04:38 <pwhalen> #link https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1691430
15:05:01 <pwhalen> PR was submitted to fix this
15:05:08 <pbrobinson> nothing of note from my side
15:05:59 <tdawson> nothing from me
15:06:46 <pwhalen> #topic 2) ==== Kernel Status ====
15:07:05 <pwhalen> #info F30: kernel-5.1.5-300.fc30
15:07:05 <pwhalen> #link https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1270727
15:07:31 <jlinton> the dnf bug should probably match on arm[78]h.*
15:07:43 <pbrobinson> the 5.1 series seems in reasonable state in the rebase, I've not seen any issues, but please do raise them on irc/email etc if you find any
15:07:49 <jlinton> that way it doesn't happen again
15:08:15 <pwhalen> jlinton, could you leave a comment on the bz?
15:08:20 <jlinton> yes
15:08:25 <pwhalen> jlinton, thanks
15:09:12 <pbrobinson> jlinton: is 'h' assumed on v8, even 32 bit?
15:09:12 <pwhalen> pbrobinson, agreed 5.1 looks pretty good
15:09:50 <pbrobinson> dnf should just use the logic in librpm rather than duplicating it
15:10:23 <jlinton> pbrobinson: Yes I think the float is mandatory on v8
15:11:32 <pwhalen> #info F31: kernel-5.2.0-0.rc2.git0.1.fc31
15:11:32 <pwhalen> #link https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1271497
15:12:24 <pwhalen> #info Investigating serial console issue on ARMv7 with 5.2.
15:13:04 <pwhalen> any other kernel issues? news?
15:14:21 <pwhalen> #info Please test and report any issues to the list or #fedora-arm.
15:14:49 <pbrobinson> 5.2 is on my list for this week
15:15:20 <pwhalen> #topic 3) ==== Bootloader Status ====
15:15:33 <pwhalen> I don't think anything has changed here
15:15:45 <pwhalen> #info No issues reported.
15:16:56 <pwhalen> #topic 4) ==== Fedora 31 ====
15:18:26 <pwhalen> we've had a few successful composes recently, most recent being yesterday. Other than kernel issues is anyone seeing any problems?
15:20:52 <pwhalen> #info Fedora 31 Changes
15:20:58 <pwhalen> #link https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/31/ChangeSet
15:21:29 <pbrobinson> yes, I need to write some up
15:21:30 <pwhalen> Are there any changes that look concerning?
15:22:09 <pbrobinson> I'll take a look later
15:23:56 <pwhalen> Ok, sounds good. We can discuss it further next week.
15:24:51 <pwhalen> #topic 5)  == Open Floor ==
15:25:08 <nirik> any further news on my fav armv7 pause bug? ;)
15:25:36 <pbrobinson> nirik: we're slowly bisecting it
15:25:47 <nirik> I tried to get a f29 install with that exact kernel, but ran into weird issues.
15:25:48 <pbrobinson> it's not a fast process but it's active an ongoing
15:26:27 <pwhalen> nirik, what weird issues?
15:26:30 <nirik> cool. I'm not 100% sure it's kernel...
15:27:08 <nirik> well, our setup we do the install and then extract the vmlinuz/initramfs and use those externally to boot...
15:27:44 <nirik> so when I did a install with kernel X and installed kernel Y and it wouldn't boot right... perhaps cmdline isn't extracting right
15:29:03 <pwhalen> OK, maybe post in channel if you hit it again
15:29:17 <nirik> sure, can look later today
15:29:59 * satellit_ listening
15:30:02 <pwhalen> but I'd agree, same kernel works on f29 userspace and paused in f30
15:30:25 <nirik> so perhaps binutils or glibc or something.
15:30:31 <nirik> but no idea. ;(
15:31:33 <nirik> would it be worth asking glibc/tools folks to look?
15:32:13 <pwhalen> hrm, ..it also looks like the f30 builder with 4.20 GA has done a bunch of builds successfully and not paused.
15:33:06 <nirik> thats f30 GA with 4.20.0-1?
15:33:53 <pwhalen> f30 up to date, with 4.20 GA
15:34:04 <pwhalen> updated last week
15:34:20 <nirik> ok
15:34:56 <pwhalen> But I'll keep at it, seems its working better than I thought. Not sure why the first build paused it
15:35:28 <pwhalen> I think its still worth trying in production
15:36:23 <nirik> ok. I did a f30 install a few days ago... it has 5.0.17-300 on it right now...
15:38:44 <pwhalen> I didnt try that version, but 5.0.x paused, also 5.1.. 5.2 we have another issue on armhfp so not tested.
15:39:11 <nirik> I'll try and put 4.20.0-1 on this one.
15:39:27 <pwhalen> nirik, thank you. As always.
15:40:44 <pwhalen> anything else for today?
15:42:01 <pwhalen> #endmeeting