15:01:17 #startmeeting Fedora ARM and AArch64 Status Meeting 15:01:17 Meeting started Tue Feb 2 15:01:17 2021 UTC. 15:01:17 This meeting is logged and archived in a public location. 15:01:17 The chair is pwhalen. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 15:01:17 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #halp #info #idea #link #topic. 15:01:17 The meeting name has been set to 'fedora_arm_and_aarch64_status_meeting' 15:01:17 #chair pwhalen pbrobinson jlinton coremodule 15:01:17 Current chairs: coremodule jlinton pbrobinson pwhalen 15:01:17 #topic roll call 15:01:24 * jlinton waves 15:01:29 * coremodule is here! 15:03:03 * pwhalen gives it another minute 15:05:21 #topic 1) ==== Userspace Status ==== 15:05:31 Any new issues? 15:06:06 nothing from me 15:06:48 #info No new issues reported. 15:06:57 #topic 2) ==== Kernel Status ==== 15:07:08 #info kernel-5.11.0-0.rc6.141.fc34 15:07:09 #link https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1697758 15:07:49 So far, not hit anything new. Anyone else? 15:09:10 No, 5.11 is working ok (post rc2 or so) on the couple devices I've been running it on 15:09:24 jlinton: that coresight issue needs to be fixed in firmware? 15:09:53 Yes, there isn't anything we can do about bad tables, unless we simply quirk the machine to disable coresight. 15:10:05 or we create our own table and load it manually. 15:10:51 ok :( 15:11:02 I guess we should have an offline discussion about shaking the OEM bush some more. 15:11:20 yea 15:11:39 Our biggest kernel issue is armhfp 15:12:03 The oz build, or something else? 15:13:00 Standard kernel gives no output, lpae boots but the panics because it cant unpack the initramfs 15:13:35 "Initramfs unpacking failed: no cpio magic" 15:14:10 qemu/kvm or something else? 15:14:12 It was suggested the kernel is overlapping with the initramfs 15:14:37 on hardware it actually seems to work.. in qemu it doesnt 15:14:44 this is with grub right? 15:15:32 right. Grub works on hw, fails in qemu 15:15:49 syslinux fails all over, but lpae gives some output 15:16:33 Let, me see if I can find some time this week to spin that up. 15:16:54 Although, I'm wondering if we should consider getting rid of LPAE soon too. 15:16:54 that would be fantastic, I'll get a bug filed with some details as well 15:17:36 I think the general conversation WRT the 32-bit kernel is that people with more than a GB or so of ram will tend to be running 64-bit capable machines now, and should move to them. 15:17:57 "high-end" 32-bit machines aren't being produced anymore for the most part. 15:18:53 we need the lpae for our builders 15:19:08 which is the other issue we have for our kernel 15:19:39 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1920183 15:19:52 "Overeager OOM kills on 5.10 kernels on 32bit arm with lpae" 15:20:03 Well, maybe tie that discussion together with building in a container rather than a full VM? 15:20:39 since the trend with Cortex-* cores is 32-bit EL0 only. 15:21:12 I dont know all that would be required for the buildsystem to switch over to it 15:21:33 sounds liek a good future change 15:24:12 #info Please test and report any issues to the list or #fedora-arm. 15:24:28 I wonder how much of that OOM bug is just gcc11+other things getting fatter 15:24:42 and more packages hitting RAM limits 15:27:20 Quite possible. 15:27:48 #topic 3) ==== Bootloader Status ==== 15:27:59 #info uboot-tools-2021.04-0.1.rc1.fc34 15:27:59 #link https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1699614 15:28:26 Not tested this yet, but will take a look today 15:28:59 Any issues with the previous build? Or in general? 15:30:58 #topic 4) ==== Fedora 34 ==== 15:31:07 #info Latest nominated compose 15:31:07 #link https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Installation_Test 15:31:54 openqa results are looking better in the last compose - https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/overview?distri=fedora&version=Rawhide&build=Fedora-Rawhide-20210201.n.1&groupid=5 15:32:28 pwhalen: on u-boot, testing for that would be good as 2021.04 will be the GA release for F34 15:33:02 will do, thanks 15:33:13 this is concerning - https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/767675#step/uefi_postinstall/8 15:33:39 looks like graphical issues again? Maybe debug kernel? 15:34:41 #info Please test and report any issues to the list or #fedora-arm. 15:34:53 huh, weird 15:35:19 coremodule: its happened before, I cant recall how it was fixed or if it just went away 15:35:27 I think its been doing that for a while, its been a bit hit/miss. I've assumed it has something to do with the arm memory mapping mismatches/etc with the VM framebuffer 15:36:05 jlinton: yea I've seen it before as well, but looks to be more consistent 15:37:10 #info Fedora 34 Schedule - https://fedorapeople.org/groups/schedule/f-34/f-34-key-tasks.html 15:38:24 Any other concerns for F34? 15:39:19 still awaiting the approval of the uefi on armv7 change 15:39:28 but other than that nothing of note 15:40:56 #info Fedora 34 Changeset 15:40:56 #link https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/34/ChangeSet 15:41:01 #topic 5) == Open Floor == 15:41:06 Anything else for today? 15:41:57 i don't have anything 15:43:17 #endmeeting