15:00:56 #startmeeting modularity_wg 15:00:56 Meeting started Tue Feb 7 15:00:56 2017 UTC. The chair is nils. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 15:00:56 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #halp #info #idea #link #topic. 15:00:56 The meeting name has been set to 'modularity_wg' 15:00:56 #meetingtopic Bi-weekly Meeting of the Modularity Working Group 15:00:56 #chair dgilmore haraldh langdon mikedep333 tflink 15:00:56 Current chairs: dgilmore haraldh langdon mikedep333 nils tflink 15:01:11 #topic Roll Call 15:01:18 .hello nphilipp 15:01:20 nils: nphilipp 'Nils Philippsen' 15:01:20 .hello ttorling 15:01:23 moto-timo: ttorling 'Tim Orling' 15:02:06 egad! 15:02:10 .hello langdon 15:02:12 langdon: langdon 'Langdon White' 15:02:15 .hello jkurik 15:02:16 jkurik: jkurik 'Jan Kurik' 15:02:26 .hello asamalik 15:02:27 asamalik: asamalik 'Adam Samalik' 15:02:44 .hello tflink 15:02:49 tflink: tflink 'Tim Flink' 15:03:11 hi 15:03:23 .hello james 15:03:24 geppetto: james 'James Antill' 15:03:36 * langdon waves to dgilmore 15:04:01 #topic Agenda 15:04:01 #info voting guidelines 15:04:01 #info Fedora Modular Server Name 15:04:14 any other topics not yet on the agenda? 15:04:57 apparently not :) 15:05:12 #topic voting guidelines 15:05:19 langdon: that's yours 15:05:30 nils, oops... really? 15:05:37 it says so on the agenda :) 15:05:39 what was ai thinking i wonder 15:05:40 http://piratepad.net/modularity-wg-agendas 15:05:44 jkurik? 15:06:06 I do not know what is needed here 15:06:22 ohh 15:06:25 i remember now.. 15:06:29 who put this on the agenda ? 15:06:36 me :) 15:07:18 i was thinking we could change the voting guidelines to be "present for meeting gets to vote".. but.. that is hard on people who can't make this time.. so i am not sure if good idea 15:07:45 thoughts? 15:08:13 if we can not vote on the meeting, than we will need a ticket for every topic and apply lazy concensus 15:08:38 right.. but we are often missing the official voting people in the meetings 15:08:59 Who are we usually missing? 15:09:04 (which is an entirely different issue) 15:09:23 geppetto: is this the part where I put people on the spot? ;) 15:09:30 geppetto, /me digs 15:10:01 https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Modularity_Working_Group 15:10:06 in the side bar 15:10:43 proposal: lets open a ticket and using the lazy concensus we can approve voting on meetings with people present 15:10:51 That list of people should be the same that I use in the Agenda doc on piratepad 15:11:20 that would make sense to me 15:11:32 In the actual meetings, I usually only chair people/nicks who are there and not marked away. 15:12:02 s/there/in the channel/ 15:12:08 So Mike, Harald and Chaoyi? … that's still enough for quorum 15:12:27 jkurik, any thoughts on capturing the "feeling" of the meeting in the ticket 15:13:04 4/7 is a pretty good quorum :) 15:13:10 langdon: I am not sure I understand 15:13:24 what do you mean by "feeling" of the meeting ? 15:13:36 "We all were at each others throats." 15:13:42 sorry.. was eating and limited to one finger typing ;) 15:13:50 "Die will wheaton, die" 15:14:00 like if we held a "non-binding vote" in the meeting and included the results in the ticket.. 15:14:06 any value? 15:14:29 * moto-timo likes that idea 15:14:33 moto-timo, now i am sad ;) 15:14:37 re: will 15:14:49 since that is the only way I get a vote 15:14:51 :) 15:14:52 yeah, will's alright 15:15:18 I am +1 15:15:41 ok.. me too 15:15:47 should we hold a vote?! ;) 15:16:04 heh 15:16:08 let's vote about voting! 15:16:15 How meta can we make this? 15:16:24 asamalik, only the official voters ;) 15:16:26 I'm sure a lot more meta 15:16:34 langdon: ha! 15:16:42 does will wheaton get a vote? 15:16:43 * moto-timo writes a new DSL 15:17:02 langdon: ask him to join the WG and we'll see I guess ;) 15:17:23 proposal: a) lets open a ticket and using the lazy concensus we can approve voting on meetings with people present b) non-binding votes may be held in the meetings to capture "feeling" of attendees and results will be included in the ticket 15:17:39 vote!! 15:17:44 +1 15:17:44 +1 15:17:47 +1 15:18:06 +1 15:18:06 dgilmore, tflink ? 15:18:10 :) 15:18:42 sorry, got pulled off on something else 15:18:46 +1 15:18:51 cool! thanks 15:19:17 ok.. need one more.. poked sct 15:19:23 +1 15:19:31 not sure why he is missing .. was on another call with him 15:19:44 sorry.. need one more voting member per the "rules" 15:19:49 .hello sct 15:19:50 sct: sct 'Stephen Tweedie' 15:19:54 Apologies! 15:19:57 sct, voting on... 15:20:02 proposal: a) lets open a ticket and using the lazy concensus we can approve voting on meetings with people present b) non-binding votes may be held in the meetings to capture "feeling" of attendees and results will be included in the ticket 15:20:16 we need one more +1 for it to pass 15:20:28 wfm 15:20:29 +1 15:20:45 cool.. the ayes have it.. (love saying that cause I am a nerd) 15:20:47 langdon: sorry double booked 15:21:10 dgilmore, you good on that proposal? should only take about 2% of brain to decide ;) 15:21:30 langdon: sure +1 15:21:31 rules require 5 votes? 15:21:37 langdon: and what about the bees? <-< 15:21:38 >-> 15:21:44 moto-timo, 4 i think, no? 15:21:47 I'll show myself out... 15:21:48 nils, i don't get it 15:21:51 :( 15:21:53 #agreed: a) lets open a ticket and using the lazy concensus we can approve voting on meetings with people present b) non-binding votes may be held in the meetings to capture "feeling" of attendees and results will be included in the ticket 15:22:01 langdon: a's, b's 15:22:08 the non-binding voters 15:22:14 nils, yeah.. the exit is right over there... 15:22:19 terrible 15:22:28 "thank you, I'll be here all week!" 15:22:29 #endmee... just kidding 15:22:31 ok.. ill update the wg 15:22:40 wiki page rather 15:22:46 next topic? 15:22:52 fine with me 15:22:58 not sure whose it is 15:23:05 jkurik, ohh.. how do we get the tickets going? 15:23:14 just make a pagure instance? or is there a process? 15:23:45 typicaly we use "issues" in pagure 15:24:05 jkurik, right.. but just make a new repo? or do something to make it "official" 15:24:06 ? 15:24:10 https://pagure.io/modularity 15:24:12 ? 15:24:17 nils, the epad seems to indicate it is me.. but we ironed it out already right? 15:24:20 https://pagure.io/modularity/issues 15:24:41 This will be the very firt issue :) 15:24:42 langdon: I don't know, announcement maybe? Or have we done that already? 15:24:47 jkurik that's what I meant :) 15:24:55 s/firt/first/ 15:24:57 asamalik, you created that repo.. to what end? 15:25:04 first dibs! 15:25:09 i think it was for the website 15:25:30 * moto-timo thinks it was a power play :) 15:25:31 langdon: yeah it's for the website 15:25:39 lol 15:25:47 haha 15:25:52 asamalik, can you rename it? e.g. modularity-website? 15:25:58 and let's make a new one? 15:26:05 moto-timo: I feel the power! 15:26:07 or you make a new one? 15:26:35 or a subproject for website? 15:26:42 * moto-timo not that pagure savvy 15:26:42 langdon: the thing is, the name us used here also: https://docs.pagure.org/modularity 15:26:45 moto-timo, there is an "org" already 15:27:09 ok.. how do peeps feel about https://pagure.io/modularity-wg? 15:27:16 +1 15:27:24 +1 15:27:27 +1 15:27:30 +1 15:27:39 ok /me goes to create 15:27:54 langdon++ 15:27:54 jkurik: Karma for langdon changed to 4 (for the f25 release cycle): https://badges.fedoraproject.org/tags/cookie/any 15:28:03 +1 15:28:15 langdon++ for pagure.io/modularity-wg 15:28:15 moto-timo: Karma for langdon changed to 5 (for the f25 release cycle): https://badges.fedoraproject.org/tags/cookie/any 15:28:51 * langdon watches pagure cook 15:28:56 https://pagure.io/modularity/modularity-wg 15:29:22 #info location for modularity tickets: https://pagure.io/modularity/modularity-wg/issues 15:29:40 so everything that needs a vote should go in there? 15:30:01 nils, yeah.. 15:30:06 sounds like a good habit to form 15:30:12 and anything anyone wants to raise 15:30:33 similar to https://pagure.io/Fedora-Council/tickets 15:30:57 and we can triage in this meeting 15:31:07 moto-timo, right 15:31:48 we should probably have it sending email out on creation and such.. but then we need a mailing list.. so maybe a problem for a different day 15:32:33 sounds like an issue 15:32:34 jkurik, moto-timo so i didn't follow what the first ticket was supposed to be 15:32:40 moto-timo, ha.. good point 15:32:46 moto-timo, file it! :) 15:32:57 the first ticket should be the voting quidelines? 15:32:59 ok.. ugghh 15:33:01 i have a thought 15:33:19 file a ticket and resolve it :) 15:33:23 should we follow the council style (to be consistent) and make the repo called "tickets"? 15:33:30 i hadn't noticed... 15:33:35 and it might be simpler 15:33:44 +0 15:33:47 agnostic 15:34:09 ok.. changing it 15:34:11 langdon: the first ticket should be voting, whether we allow voting on meeting even some people with "voters" priviledge are not present on the meeting 15:34:32 right 15:35:12 langdon: I dot think it matters whether it is "tickets" or "issues" 15:35:39 but if someone feels it should be "tickets", I am fine with it 15:35:49 design has "issues" but they say "tickets" as a synonym 15:36:12 #undo 15:36:12 Removing item from minutes: INFO by langdon at 15:29:22 : location for modularity tickets: https://pagure.io/modularity/modularity-wg/issues 15:36:29 #info location for modularity tickets: https://pagure.io/modularity/tickets/issues 15:36:34 consistency is nice 15:37:25 ok.. let's end this :) 15:37:32 hang on 15:37:34 #undo 15:37:34 Removing item from minutes: INFO by langdon at 15:36:29 : location for modularity tickets: https://pagure.io/modularity/tickets/issues 15:37:40 moto-timo or jkurik can you file the issue re: voting 15:37:47 #link https://pagure.io/modularity/tickets/issues location for modularity tickets 15:37:48 do i have a typo or something? 15:37:50 :D 15:37:53 ahh ok 15:38:21 * moto-timo lets jkurik file the first one 15:38:27 I'll file the mailing list one 15:38:34 langdon: ok, I will file the ticket 15:38:38 langdon: so next one on epad already done? 15:39:07 Fedora Modular Server name? 15:39:09 nils, announce maybe? i am behind on the devel-ml .. so i am not sure the status of our "Fedora Change" 15:39:18 me neither :) 15:39:19 jkurik, do you have an update? set of open questions? 15:39:21 let's do it 15:39:38 #topic Fedora Modular Server name 15:39:41 maybe a better topic "Fedora System Wide Change status" 15:39:48 ok 15:39:50 #undo 15:39:50 Removing item from minutes: 15:39:59 * moto-timo sees the light 15:40:02 #topic Fedora System Wide Change Status 15:40:07 * langdon notes it is seriously snowing here 15:40:37 ok.. jkurik any update on the change proposal? 15:40:57 * langdon thinks you are the change wrangler but could have confused himself 15:41:45 langdon: https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/1673 <- waiting for FESCo to approve 15:41:58 the FESCo meeting in on Friday 15:42:18 jkurik, looks like it actually was? 15:42:25 ah, sorry. This was already approved 15:42:26 https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/1673#comment-71872 15:42:44 * jkurik is very bad in doing more things in paralel 15:42:57 #link https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/1673 Modular Server Preview: Boltron Approved!! 15:43:05 jkurik, ha.. no worries.. me too sometimes 15:43:25 * moto-timo sees a new sticker design looming 15:43:33 so that's it I guess, next topic? 15:43:33 "I am Boltron!" 15:43:34 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1419506 <- tracking ticket 15:43:38 moto-timo: hehe 15:43:53 ok.. we should add to the "things to do" to create an announcement of the name and the content we expect to ship. 15:44:07 i think i might be able to pull that together by sometime next week 15:44:07 langdon: and you should have already received badge for a Change accepted for F26 :) 15:44:18 jkurik, lol.. ill be sure to look ;) 15:44:35 * moto-timo covets the badge 15:45:10 moto-timo, maybe you should propose a change that more people get badges.. 15:45:26 ok.. we got anything else on this? 15:45:27 just create more badges 15:45:29 :) 15:45:40 "Sneeze Badgle Lvl 3" 15:45:46 * moto-timo writes a badgebot 15:46:07 omg.. i have apparently edited 50+ wiki pages?!?! 15:46:31 langdon: 50 edits, not individual pages methinks 15:46:46 ok.. seriously.. nils, where is your iron-agenda-fist? 15:46:51 nils, ahh perhaps 15:47:08 * moto-timo edits the same page 50 times.. 15:47:28 moto-timo: game the system, submit each changed character as its own edit :o) 15:47:37 woot! 15:47:38 langdon: haha is that a badge for being productive or for not using the preview button? 15:47:48 asamalik, harsh! 15:47:52 nils++ for badge ideas 15:47:52 moto-timo: Karma for nphilipp changed to 3 (for the f25 release cycle): https://badges.fedoraproject.org/tags/cookie/any 15:47:58 ok.. seriously folks! next topic? 15:48:03 and/or open floor? 15:48:04 yup 15:48:08 i have a meeting in 12m 15:48:17 well, nothing on the agenda on epad, no? 15:48:26 so.. 15:48:27 nils, right.. 15:48:30 #topic open floor 15:48:37 go for it :) 15:48:40 asamalik++ for being cool under fire at DevConf 15:48:41 moto-timo: Karma for asamalik changed to 2 (for the f25 release cycle): https://badges.fedoraproject.org/tags/cookie/any 15:49:20 do we have any topics? 15:49:21 moto-timo: he tnx 15:49:30 like open floor qs? 15:49:34 I don't :) 15:49:43 how did people receive Modularity at DevConf? 15:49:49 * langdon taunts moto-timo : https://badges.fedoraproject.org/badge/fedora-26-change-accepted 15:49:49 excited? confused? 15:50:00 other than "when will my cold be over" but that goes into whiny territory so fast 15:50:04 i thought it was positive? 15:50:15 fosdem as well.. but it isn't "real" yet 15:50:33 we need to send the email i described above.. and ship boltron 15:50:40 then i think we will get some real reactions 15:50:49 more than the sysadmin whines 15:51:48 can somebody mail me a Modularity-WG sticker? 15:51:57 asamalik: ^^ 15:52:15 i have two left if necessary.. if asamalik is out 15:52:28 moto-timo: haha I can! 15:52:32 cool 15:52:59 moto-timo: will just need your address and $59 :P 15:53:09 lol 15:53:19 actually.. it may be cheaper for me to mail it .. moto-timo you are in the US right? 15:53:19 moto-timo: this is the point where you're looking up the cheapest dollar currency in the world ;) 15:53:23 moto-timo: or at least one of those things 15:53:24 or am i making that up? 15:53:40 you can leave one at a hotel in Munich and I'll pick it up in april 15:53:42 :) 15:53:48 I guess that letters cost like $1 to the whole world if I'm right 15:54:15 asamalik, ohh wow.. ok.. i didn't know that 15:54:19 nils ha ha 15:54:32 im gonna bail.. to get a break before my next meeting 15:54:39 langdon: see ya 15:54:43 thanks langdon 15:54:55 still sorta here but may be afk 15:55:09 me has another meeting in 5 min too 15:55:11 not sure how it is with USPS, but Deutsche Post also wants just 0.90€ for a letter to the US 15:55:24 32 CZK :) 15:55:35 and one beer 15:55:45 in that case it's cheaper here, amazing 15:56:01 nils: engineered more efficiently :P 15:56:07 asamalik: I don't think so 15:56:15 haha 15:56:22 cheaper easter block labor? 15:56:31 eastern 15:56:40 moto-timo: so if you email me an address, I can send it ;) 15:56:47 thanks 15:56:55 moto-timo: It's the German Post where it's cheaper, now you ;) 15:57:24 and I don't think .cz likes being referred to as being of the "Eastern Block" ;) 15:57:50 anyway, I think you two are sorted out, anything else? 15:57:57 nils: "Central Europe" please :) 15:58:06 jkurik: that's what I was getting at 15:58:07 * moto-timo puts his filter back on 15:58:38 langdon: have you created the repo on pagure already ? https://pagure.io/modularity-wg 15:59:11 jkurik: https://pagure.io/modularity/tickets/issues 15:59:57 what happens if I create modularity/issues repo? it breaks! 16:00:00 ok, thanks. I am perhaps not very concentrated today 16:00:03 anyway 16:00:28 need to go... bye everyone! thanks! 16:00:52 in that case, thanks everybody! 16:01:09 thanks 16:01:12 #endmeeting