15:03:38 #startmeeting RELENG (2020-04-07) 15:03:38 Meeting started Tue Apr 7 15:03:38 2020 UTC. 15:03:38 This meeting is logged and archived in a public location. 15:03:38 The chair is mboddu. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 15:03:38 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #halp #info #idea #link #topic. 15:03:38 The meeting name has been set to 'releng_(2020-04-07)' 15:03:39 #meetingname releng 15:03:39 The meeting name has been set to 'releng' 15:03:39 #chair nirik sharkcz pbrobinson pingou mboddu dustymabe ksinny jednorozec 15:03:39 #topic init process 15:03:39 Current chairs: dustymabe jednorozec ksinny mboddu nirik pbrobinson pingou sharkcz 15:04:34 morning 15:04:51 Morning nirik and thanks for reminding, I wasn't paying attention to time 15:05:04 easy to do. 15:05:08 or not do 15:05:11 or something 15:05:34 Haha :) 15:05:39 Okay, lets get started 15:05:58 #topic #9384 releng check for: Removal of the glibc-headers package 15:06:04 #link https://pagure.io/releng/issue/9384 15:06:22 I think this will hopefully work fine. 15:06:30 nothing we need do that I can think of 15:06:55 I had a question about it which I wanted to ask you, but I couldn't remember, bahh.... :( 15:09:05 happens to me all the time. :) 15:10:16 nirik: "We cannot remove the glibc-headers.i686 package from the build because the i686 buildroot needs it. The current solution is to provide a glibc-headers-x86.noarch package on i686 and x86_64. Since it is a noarch package, the existing compose tool is no longer a problem." 15:10:23 ^ from the change request 15:10:32 I am not sure I was able to follow it 15:10:35 yeah 15:10:59 so right now we have glibc-headers as a archfull subpackage... ie, it has a version on all arches. 15:11:28 we can't just nuke the i686 one completely, because on i686 installs (which we don't support, but in theory could exist) it needs it. 15:11:47 Does that mean they are combing glibc-headers.x86_64 and glibc-headers.i686 into glibc-headers-x86.noarch? 15:11:51 but if we change that to a noarch subpackage, we can only include it on x86_64 and i686 15:11:56 yeah. 15:12:16 Oh okay, that made sense now 15:12:36 Well, I will update the ticket and there is no work needed from releng 15:12:38 Thanks nirik 15:13:05 yeah, unless we missed something that should work 15:13:11 and be easier than messing with pungi 15:15:27 Agreed 15:15:48 #info No releng work is need on this change 15:15:58 #topic #9359 F33 system wide change: Introduce module Obsoletes and EOL 15:16:04 #link https://pagure.io/releng/issue/9359 15:16:27 "have a central place for managing the new modulemd documents" not sure how they will look like 15:16:37 So, I suggested modules/ namespace in dist-git 15:16:56 We also have fedora-module-defaults repo, but thats not something we should use for this 15:17:31 ok. I think there's still discussion on the devel list on this one too 15:18:50 Yes 15:18:58 Not very positive about the change 15:19:05 I haven't followed it much 15:19:34 do chime in on it if you have thoughts. ;) 15:20:23 Yeah, I need to look into it throughly (since its modularity, its not always as I think it is) 15:21:37 * nirik nods 15:22:12 #topic #9240 Update published Fedora 31 cloud images 15:22:19 #link https://pagure.io/releng/issue/9240 15:24:16 no idea here, but it seems like a great thing to do. 15:25:11 Yeah, no idea for me as well 15:25:27 * mboddu looks for Dusty 15:25:28 this is something we can do in freeze? perhaps we should schedule a time next week and see if we can get it done? not sure what dusty's schedule is like... 15:26:59 Hey dustymabe 15:27:29 \o 15:27:32 dustymabe: We are talking about https://pagure.io/releng/issue/9240 15:28:09 mboddu: cool 15:28:19 nirik suggested to schedule a time next week during freeze to work on this 15:28:53 dustymabe: How hard is it? How much time does it require and are you free next week? 15:29:19 I think basically what we need is something very similar to what we had for Atomic Host 15:29:35 i.e. something like pushtwoweekatomic.py 15:30:11 and the website code updated to source information from fedmsgs or something 15:30:40 automated tests would be nice, but not strictly required if we have some volunteers that would be willing to run some things 15:30:53 I wish we could do something to make the newest fedora cloud image on aws appear better, but thats likely beyond the scope here. ;( 15:31:14 the thing is I can't drive this whole effort - i just don't have the cycles to do much more than help 15:31:31 if it makes anyone feel any better we've started holding cloud WG meetings again every two weeks 15:31:34 dustymabe: Sure, we can understand 15:32:03 dustymabe: Awesome, can you help us run the manual process once and we can take of the automation process? 15:32:10 so it would be nice to collect interested people/parties and invite them to come to the WG meetings 15:32:29 mboddu: yeah let's schedule some time next week to talk about it 15:32:30 Ack 15:32:35 perhaps we could split it out into several parts... 15:32:44 dustymabe: Awesome 15:32:44 actually we could use the cloud WG meeting time 15:32:48 for different people to work on (if we have different people willing) 15:33:07 nirik: How do you wanna split them? 15:33:27 https://apps.fedoraproject.org/calendar/cloud/2020/4/14/ 15:33:36 well, someone writes the playbook/py script, someone updates websites code, some testing? 15:33:37 there is the cloud meeting schedule for next week 15:34:11 My plan is, look at the publishing part, ^^ playbook/py script part and updating websites part for now 15:34:32 And let the Cloud WG do manual testing until we figure out automated testing 15:35:02 well, openqa is actually testing them I think. 15:35:16 regarding manual testing.. we can reduce release cadence until we automated 15:35:16 I am only expecting to learn how its manually published to write playbook/py script later and what pieces are updated on websites side 15:35:28 i.e. once very two months would still be better than what we have 15:35:33 dustymabe: Sure 15:35:53 we would have 0, 2, 4, 6 (next fedora release), 8, 10, etc 15:35:59 .time 15:36:00 mboddu: 03:35 PM, April 07, 2020 15:36:27 Oh that is great, the cloud wg meeting is clashing with this meeting :( 15:36:40 :) - assuming it's weekly, yes 15:37:03 Well, not entirely, we can meet in the second half of the cloud meeting 15:37:04 we could look at moving it 15:37:37 or we could combine. ;) 15:37:37 Lets leave it for now 15:38:54 well, I am not sure about that 15:39:29 Anyway, thanks dustymabe, I will schedule a meeting for the second half of the Cloud wg meeting to go over this 15:39:51 +1 15:40:11 if you've got some downtime this week - there is the ostree import and prune stuff we need to finish off :) 15:40:17 #info We will go over it next week Tue at 16:00 UTC 15:40:21 would love to run the first prune this weekend if we could 15:41:06 downtime? whats that? 15:41:30 :) - a mythical notion 15:41:33 dustymabe: I might be able to work on it tomorrow afternoon? are you free then? 15:42:21 * mboddu can join 15:45:10 let me check 15:45:23 i should be after 1:30 eastern 15:45:25 so yes 15:45:33 can you pop something on my calendar ? 15:46:57 I could do 2:30 to 3:30 or after 4 15:47:17 (If I have converted timezones right) 15:47:21 It's possible I'll have a meeting pop up on my calendar for 5 eastern, but it should be short 15:47:56 so 2:30 to 3 pacific should work 15:48:03 i'll have to leave after 3 pacific 15:48:04 lets try that... mboddu ? 15:48:31 That should work for me 15:48:58 cool. can someone add it? or I can after a bit 15:49:08 I can send an invite 15:50:07 So, 5:30 to 6:00 Eastern tomorrow 15:50:55 no. 2:30 to 3 eastern 15:51:08 right after the infra ops standup 15:51:23 haha, I was referring to 5:30 to 6 eastern 15:51:25 [11:47:56] so 2:30 to 3 pacific should work ? 15:51:29 but 2:30 eastern works better 15:51:30 I was converting to eastern. 15:51:35 but I guess that confused everyone 15:51:47 Okay, 2:30 eastern it is, sorry for the first invite 15:51:48 because then I can go longer than 3 (so more than 30 minutes) 15:51:53 +1 15:51:56 TZ=jarc 15:52:01 TZ=hard 15:52:28 but I have something at 12:30 my time... ie, 3:30 eastern... 15:52:40 but we could do an hour then and hopefully get it working 15:52:55 I scheduled it for 1 hour, we will see then 15:53:32 Sorry dustymabe, I asked for 5 min but we got you for almost 30 min 15:53:34 Anyway 15:53:38 #topic Open Floor 15:53:53 #info Fedora 32 Final Freeze moved to Thu, Apr 09th 2020 15:55:19 Anything else to share? 15:55:48 not much. I continue to poke at the kojira / newrepo issues... 15:56:51 Let me know if you need any help nirik 15:56:55 Thanks everyone for joining 15:57:04 #endmeeting