21:00:00 #startmeeting 21:00:10 #meetingtopic EPEL 21:00:15 #topic Init process 21:00:23 who all is here for the epel meeting? 21:01:50 * ianweller sits in a chair in the back 21:02:16 nirik: I'm around. 21:03:27 hey stahnma 21:03:36 howdy 21:03:40 I guess dgilmore is still in south america 21:04:13 I guess we can go ahead and start and see what we can come up with... 21:04:14 SA is still the same TZ though 21:04:34 true... 21:04:51 #topic Prepare for EL-6 builds? 21:05:10 I'm not sure where this topic was added from, but it was on the wiki page. ;) 21:05:20 I assume we will see some betas we could test with at some point. 21:05:59 I would hope so 21:06:14 It might be cool if someone could mass rebuild fedora against it and see how much just builds ok out of the box... 21:06:19 I thikn the question was will we only branch stuff currently in EPEL, or a mass fedora branch? 21:06:22 yeah 21:06:24 but that could be a pretty massive undertaking. 21:06:41 probably need dgilmore to weigh in on that one 21:07:03 I would say only EPEL5 stuff, but make a lot of noise at the time and ask all maintainers to see if there are any packages they maintain that could/should be branched. 21:07:32 it's probalby not worth discussing too much yet 21:07:34 ie, a fedora-devel-announce and lots of blog posts asking people to look at their packages and test build and see if they want to maintain them for epel too 21:07:41 yeah, a bit early. 21:08:06 anything else anyone wants to weigh in on here? 21:08:25 ok, moving along... 21:08:38 #topic Koji/Bodhi progress report 21:08:59 I guess koji is done... hurray! but bodhi still needs some work... 21:09:28 lmacken: you around? any idea on the patches for epel support? looking ok? more work? any eta? :) 21:09:33 im here. network is flaky 21:09:44 im waiting on lmacken now 21:09:52 i need to send him patches for the mash configs 21:09:55 welcome dgilmore. :) 21:10:04 yeah, I last heard he was going to test some things? 21:10:30 thanks for all your work on this... very appreciated. 21:11:11 EL-6 builds we cant really do anything until redhat releases at least a alpha release 21:11:27 yeah, just something to ponder for now... 21:11:48 we should tag in teh base os's version of all epel pacakges i.e F-11 or F-12 or whatever it is 21:11:57 and then mass rebuild everything 21:12:21 ok, I guess we can move along? unless anything else on this. 21:12:35 dgilmore: thats a interesting idea... sync back to fedora versions. 21:12:51 nirik, dgilmore: I did a bunch of EPEL integration hacking earlier this week, and integrated dgilmores patches. The test suite work, and I did a bunch of local testing, but we haven't tried doing an actual push yet. releng1.stg was rebuilt, so now we have to deploy & test 21:13:16 * nirik is happy to assist testing if someone will show him how to run the commands, etc. ;) 21:13:19 with CVS branches from the base fedorafedora release 21:13:21 release 21:13:32 * quaid slides in to the back of the room, late 21:13:42 lmacken ok 21:13:50 yeah, testing will probably consist of tweaking paths and mash configs 21:13:52 lmaken we have a epel releng box 21:14:01 dgilmore: I like that idea off hand. Means we reconverge on fedora versions and only make epel specific changes if needed on top of those... 21:14:01 yes I would like to do a mass rebuild when we have a beta fro EL6 21:14:10 * smooge is really slow typing 21:14:12 nirik: right 21:14:23 dgilmore: cool 21:14:52 my net keeps dropping in and out 21:14:56 anyway, I'm going to try and get bodhi up and running in staging over the weekend 21:15:11 lmacken: ok so monday we can look at deploying? 21:15:50 dgilmore: I'm headed to NYC for PDF monday-tues, so I'll be on and off, but I'll do what I can to get it working before then 21:17:03 lmacken: ok. im flying home from Brazil 21:18:13 ok, anything further on this topic? 21:18:58 i think its looking like next week there will be more. 21:19:17 yeah. 21:19:22 #topic Bug Day 21:19:32 I sent out the last update to list 21:19:38 I need to send something out as a reminder 21:19:41 and talk to bugzappers 21:20:01 cool. 21:20:04 I think that John was going to give a quick script to query for whiteboard field 21:20:16 I haven't had any time to look into python-bugzilla 21:20:33 that could be handy 21:20:34 I pointed him at a bunch of examples last night 21:20:41 Ok what was the day for that.. 21:20:56 It's July 11th. 21:20:57 bug day? 21:21:16 * Jeff_S waves... better late then never for showing up for the meeting? 21:21:24 welcome anytime Jeff_S 21:21:31 I was actually wishing I had added a category for messed up dependencies 21:21:38 we have quite a few bugs wth that 21:21:58 we still could. ;) 21:22:07 then I have to re-read the bugs 21:22:16 I will be busy on July 11 http://deathride.com/ but I will think about bugs while I ride 21:22:19 and i've been through all of them at least once, many of them more than that 21:22:23 ha 21:22:26 Jeff_S: fair enough. ;) 21:22:34 just fix some bugs before then 21:22:59 ok, anything else on bug day? 21:23:41 not right now 21:23:45 more next week for sure 21:23:48 and on list this week 21:23:49 ok looks like I will be double booked on that. I will be available in Mountain Time afternoon 21:23:57 but I will work on it 21:23:58 * stahnma is brain-dead :) 21:24:07 ok, moving along then... 21:24:12 #topic Orphaned packages 21:24:21 I thought I would bring up orphans again... 21:24:33 do we want to try and make an effort to get people owning them? 21:24:46 I'd like trending on how many people orphan stuff or quite epel all together 21:24:53 nirik: we probably should 21:25:06 yeah, not sure how to get that. ;) 21:25:17 I guess I can post to the list a list of them and see if anyone is interested. 21:25:30 #action nirik will post list of current orphans to the list 21:25:56 currently my query isn't working, so not exactly sure how many we have. 21:27:01 anyhow, just thought I would bring it up. 21:27:10 fair enough 21:27:10 #topic Open Floor 21:27:16 anyone have anything? 21:28:07 guess not 21:28:12 not at the moment 21:28:15 looking like not... 21:28:29 I appreciate everyone meeting. I think it's good, even if we just go over things we know... ;) 21:28:34 thanks ofr running things. 21:28:35 keeps the work in the front of our minds. :) 21:28:42 nirik: thanks 21:28:50 no problem. 21:28:51 so, just since I was thinking about it ... 21:29:08 I'm going to do a map of "Current|Suggested New" name mapping for the wiki 21:29:18 quaid, do we have a list of EL-5.4 packages etc? 21:29:35 it's not a lot pages ... so we can turn it over pretty quickly. 21:29:40 smooge: hey! my favorite topic 21:30:01 I have no clue who to ask to get a permanent feed about that 21:30:37 do we have anyone in the release engineering group @redhat.com? 21:30:44 quaid, I can understand. I think we need to get someone who has such an answer into a small room 21:30:46 quaid: could we try and talk to notting/spot and see if they could find us someone? 21:31:03 oh yes, i was supposed to follow up on that 21:31:09 :( /me fail 21:31:18 nirik: well, spot is probably the man to get us something, and he has said in the past he would, but ... 21:31:22 remind me when i'm back in the US. 21:31:23 maybe we just need A Name from him 21:31:24 and I will do it. 21:31:27 spot: will do 21:31:41 coolness. :) thanks spot. 21:31:42 stahnma: will you remember to poke Tom about it next week? 21:32:06 I'll do my best 21:32:16 * quaid too 21:32:19 #action stahnma will remember to ask about RHEL release engineering 21:32:50 * nirik doesn't know if that works for non chairs yet. 21:32:53 #action stahnma will remember to ask about RHEL release engineering 21:33:08 I thought it did 21:33:15 There are 53 orphaned packages currently in EPEL. 21:33:37 out of 2665 packages. 21:33:38 #action quaid to send a mapping of old:new wiki page names to epel-devel for comment before enacting 21:34:45 ok, anything else anyone has? 21:35:10 * nirik will close out the meeting in 60seconds if nothing else comes up. 21:36:09 #endmeeting