20:59:32 #startmeeting EPEL 21:00:04 Hello people. dgilmore f13 jds2001 Jeff_S jmeeuwen mpdehaan nirik smooge smooge stahnma vwbusguy quaid 21:00:15 hi 21:00:16 hello 21:00:21 I'm kind of here. sort of 21:00:26 you rang 21:00:54 hi guys I will be running the EPEL meeting for today. Nirik is in an emergency 21:01:01 oi, g'luck to him 21:01:13 I am trying to get the agenda 21:01:29 #topic Dealing with incompatible upgrades. (any new ideas or suggestions?) 21:01:43 Ok first item on the agenda was dealing with incompatible upgrades 21:02:19 At this point we have had a couple of ideas but it looks like we are dealing with announce, throw into testing, announce, throw into stable 21:03:00 trying to deal with things like moin-1.6 -> moin16 etc are just not inside of our bandwidth or time 21:03:07 any other views on this? 21:04:50 mediawiki 1.15 is another big example 21:05:10 yes. I am looking at to do this to deal with various security upgrades 21:05:51 They were kind enough to make a 1.14.1 package with the fix as well, for what that's worth 21:05:52 * jds2001 here 21:06:07 ah ok 21:06:13 There are other cases where things are not as conveinent though 21:06:19 For example, nagios has a shell execution vulnerability 21:06:23 And nagios 2 is kind of dead. 21:07:17 yeah :( 21:07:50 i think the idea is to announce via epel-announce, and JFDI 21:07:56 as lame as that is. 21:08:19 Thankfully that's patched in our package :-) 21:08:39 that is my view on it also. I think our ability to do long term support of items is not in our manpower 21:09:02 if it's easy, great 21:09:16 how bout something like "incompatible upgrades SHOULD be avoided" 21:09:23 if that's impossible, oh well. 21:10:28 I think thats the best we can do. Trying for other items without 'paid' for time is going to be haphazard at best 21:10:56 and even with full time bodies, success is not assured. 21:11:58 * jds2001 notes the critical NSS vuln from today, which updates the library 21:12:15 or recently, if my days are blending together :) 21:13:16 sometime within the last 24-48 hours 21:13:41 anyhow, shall we move on if we dont have anything else here? 21:13:43 is there anything more? I think we are pretty much on agreement about that. 21:14:01 #topic Wiki pages cleanup. 21:14:08 quaid, this might be you 21:14:19 yeah, it might be! 21:14:39 um, it's on my list in an appropriate priority 21:14:51 77 out of a thousand? 21:14:56 an "appropriate priority" :) 21:14:56 but worth mentioning that I am doing it in three-ish phases 21:15:06 one - figure out what is there and what it should be 21:15:13 - which includes defining categories 21:15:20 - so will show that to list for input 21:15:33 two - start changing page names, adding to categories 21:15:34 ok 21:15:47 three- get bored and hope others start pitching in, adding new content in categories, etc. 21:16:07 buy-in during 'one' means more help during 'three', or so I hope 21:16:32 umm, I'll see if I can get that list+suggested categories to the list by early-mid next week 21:17:09 21:17:15 * nirik is sorta back from the crisis now. 21:17:41 ok quaid that sounds good. 21:17:56 #action quaid to write up list of new page names + suggested categories by 08 Aug 21:18:20 I think in many ways we would do well with a smaller set of pages because frankly I get lost at the stuff there 21:18:21 #action quaid to write up list of new page names + suggested categories by 08 Aug 21:18:36 * smooge repeating becasue I cant remember if only the chair can do that 21:19:02 when do you think we might have a list of pages? 21:19:44 we can generate that to look at right away ... 21:19:47 * quaid looks 21:20:41 smooge: you can make more chairs with #chair 21:20:42 http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Special:PrefixIndex/EPEL 21:21:23 To be honest.. I am not sure reports int eh wiki are the best use of a wiki 21:21:31 so, for example, all the EPEL/Reports* will move to a Meetings:EPEL_report_DATE and be added to [[Category:EPEL meetings]] 21:21:32 me either 21:21:37 yep 21:21:43 and the epel steering comittee is defunct. 21:21:43 that takes them out of the regular search space 21:21:47 and makes them easy to find 21:21:50 by category 21:22:09 so that moves to Archive: 21:22:25 http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Category:Docs_Project_meetings 21:22:29 for example 21:22:46 oh, something like that :) 21:23:16 jds2001: yep, Archive: + put in a category so it's easy to find, e.g. [[Category:EPEL deprecated pages]] 21:23:55 I think a nice main landing page with users and contributors links would be good... then some more info in each of those areas might be logical 21:24:19 that's a good point, redoing the landing page is a separate task IMO 21:24:25 which can happen in parallel 21:24:27 I was wondering if we should be looking at Fedora Community more 21:24:41 smooge: how so? 21:25:11 well maybe I am misunderstadning what FC is about. I thought it was a place for landing sites to build a community 21:25:29 no, it integrates various tools 21:25:37 well darn 21:25:39 bodhi, koji, etc 21:25:46 yep, it's a tool for contributors to get more goodness 21:25:55 more of a "contirbutor portal 21:25:56 " 21:26:09 so, for example, we'll want to show off via link to a demo, because FC is one thing that should attract more EPEL contributors 21:26:26 no wonder I have never understood what FC pages say from what I understood via blogs... 21:27:03 smoogen needs new language compiler it would seem. 21:27:19 ok so the wiki landing pages are what we want :0 21:28:06 smooge: it's a bit of an ambigious name, I agree 21:29:04 oh well thats a different marketing meeting :P 21:29:23 onto this one.. I think we should move to the mailling list your list of pages and what we think we should do with them 21:30:18 +1 that was the intention 21:30:27 ok thanks.. 21:30:27 and that's what I'll do by mid next week 21:30:29 why so long? 21:30:34 to make a CSV file :) 21:30:57 * quaid notes there is an fhosted git repo for wiki page renaming he'll use that we can all contrib to. 21:31:03 yeah.. need HTML awk 21:31:35 quaid, could you explain what you mean by an git repo for wiki page renaming? 21:31:49 yes 21:31:52 oh, the psv thing? 21:31:57 jds2001: yeah, that 21:32:05 we do so many renamings for groups 21:32:12 that we have a git repo on fhosted 21:32:20 where anyone who is part of *any* group can r/w to the repo 21:32:35 so a sub-project can use it to quickly collab on a common pipe-separated-values (PSV) file 21:32:40 e.g. 21:32:49 OldName|New name|Categorie(s) 21:33:02 so I'll put up a file with my suggestions, etc. 21:33:10 we'll either discuss, patch, or you can write to it 21:33:17 and that gives us something to work from in renaming 21:33:18 well, you have to be a member of a group that has fedorahosted access 21:33:30 or apply to gitwikirename 21:33:34 (it was designed to be used by an API chewing wiki tool that never did it ...) 21:33:39 jds2001: correct, thank you 21:33:55 anyway, we don't have that many pages, it will be a quick one 21:34:14 ok.. thanks. add that tot he email so we could see what it should look like, what group we need to join etc. Thanks 21:35:14 ok next topic? 21:36:24 #topic Increasing Contibutor base. 21:36:32 Ideas suggestions? 21:36:47 more noise 21:36:48 inode0 has thought about getting a FAD together 21:36:57 FAD == good 21:37:05 maybe at the Summit would be a good place 21:37:20 since we have lots of enterprise-y ppl there 21:37:49 thats a good idea. I won't be at the Summit.. not sure who will be from RH. But thats actually a good way to get people on this 21:37:49 logistics may be a challenge though 21:38:31 logistics is always the challenge for us :) 21:38:47 who will be at the Summit? 21:39:46 how much noise have we made about how much easier it is to package for EPEL with integration in to the regular package tools? 21:40:06 not a whole bunch i dont think 21:40:08 is there anyone who can shoot a screencast or video of using Fedora Community to do EPEL packaging duties? 21:40:25 we can get some Marketing help, perhaps. 21:40:26 but i personally didnt find it to be a challenge when we were using plague 21:40:38 what would an EPEL area of this page look like? 21:40:39 https://fedoraproject.org/w/uploads/c/ce/FooBar.png 21:40:52 jds2001: you are not the normal case? :) 21:41:07 let's pretend it used to be "hard" and now it's "easy" 21:41:12 it's something to talk up :) 21:41:26 that page "FooBar... 21:41:43 is the Marketing's magazine-format idea currently called "Fedora Insight" 21:41:51 and I see lots of rawhide and current release goodness there 21:41:54 bah I liked FooBar better 21:41:58 but no EPEL 21:42:08 smooge: yeah, like EPEL - not at all ambiguous! 21:42:35 ok, another questions: 21:42:55 do we know who's taking over marketing? 21:42:56 who here would like to commit to writing an EPEL-positive blog post once a week 21:43:04 not me 21:43:17 jds2001: things look fine in mel's hands for now, let's see where thet goes. 21:43:29 oh quaid that was meant as in taking over marketing 21:43:31 * jds2001 hasnt written *a* blog post for months 21:43:35 :/ 21:43:40 quaid, its probably on my job description 21:43:45 well 21:43:53 if we took a simple message" 21:43:56 jds2001, you need to do so.. I was left in limbo about your arm. 21:44:01 "EPEL is easier and more meaningful than ever" 21:44:14 a nd all repeated it across several people every week 21:44:26 simplify and amplify 21:44:33 and attract more contributors. 21:44:46 our Ambassadors needs to know to talk about it, for example. 21:44:53 smooge: all better now, you wouldnt be able to tell anything was ever wrong except via an x-ray where you'd see a metal plate now :) 21:45:11 that sounds like a good idea. What I wanted to talk to you about how we could build a community around this. 21:45:34 enterprise people are not very openly passionate people. 21:45:36 * jds2001 commits to writing a blog post this weekend. 21:45:39 I'll take the action of defining (via the list) a simple message we can all amplify 21:45:51 smooge: exactly what we want to take in to account 21:46:05 you have a short job life if you are too passionate. 21:46:08 stability, security, ease of management == there are passions in there for that :) 21:46:18 simmering perhaps 21:46:31 and we could support RHEL-3 !!! 21:46:39 sorry theres my passion point 21:46:53 for example btw ... 21:47:03 I like what stahnma has written about EPEL, RHEL, and CentOS in the past 21:47:03 smooge: really? :) 21:47:15 * jds2001 sends smooge to get his head examined. 21:47:32 as an EPEL advocate inside/outside, that stuff resonates IMO 21:48:09 smooge: will ya #action me there :) 21:48:32 #action jds2001 to write blog post this weekend 21:48:32 #action quaid will define to the list a simple message we can amplify 21:49:22 jds2001, i keep running into places that EL3 and thinking of going to EL4 21:49:27 "Fedora - enterprise passion you don't have to fake." 21:50:38 now I have a parody scene from "Harry met Sally" in my head. 21:51:55 anyway.. 21:52:04 I think thats a good idea. 21:52:53 any more ideas on this? 21:53:18 #topic Next Stable Push. 21:53:27 dgilmore, how does the stable push look? 21:55:51 bueller? bueller? anyone? 21:56:07 * quaid is out racing his friend's dad's car 21:57:05 well you break you pay for it. 21:57:19 take some blankety blank responsibility for yourself.. versus your friend :) 21:58:00 I think the el5 one is done, the el4 one is pending? but not sure. 21:59:13 ok thanks 21:59:24 I think we have run out of steam here 21:59:35 closing in 30 seconds 21:59:41 * nirik got pulled back into his emerg. ;( Thanks for running things smooge 21:59:46 smooge: i started but got sidetracked 21:59:59 thanks dgilmore ... I think we all ahve been 22:00:16 thanks for getting the builders and such up. 22:01:21 #endmeeting