21:00:33 #startmeeting EPEL 21:00:33 Meeting started Fri Oct 30 21:00:33 2009 UTC. The chair is nirik. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 21:00:33 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #halp #info #idea #link #topic. 21:00:56 #topic Init process 21:02:56 who all is around for an epel meeting? 21:07:09 im here 21:07:17 just slow :) 21:07:18 here 21:09:24 anyone else? 21:09:39 * maxamillion is here (kinda) 21:10:18 * derks thinks an action item should be how to get more people to show up 21:10:37 maybe not have the meeting on a friday afternoon (US) 21:10:38 :) 21:10:54 true. everyone quits early on friday 21:12:34 we could change times again... but all times have been bad. 21:12:54 * nirik is working a work issue, so will be slow today. 21:12:59 hre 21:13:26 fuse issues? 21:13:49 #topic Status update on action items 21:14:03 smooge: anything on the rhel package blocking? have those been blocked? 21:14:32 not yet. I wanted to get feedback from people and then feed them to dgilmore 21:14:59 there are some packages that were dropped from RHEL (frysk) that we needed to go over if we wanted to 'unblock' them 21:15:21 ah, possibly contact the fedora maintainers? 21:15:21 (though frysk is 'dead' upstream so it might not make sense to make builds for it 21:15:39 there was talk that came up in #epel about python-setuptools still being in EPEL with a newer version than RHEL 21:16:19 derks: pls open a bug and cc me 21:16:23 yeah.. thats a problem in that upstream put the package in and we didn't know it 21:16:36 spot, will do 21:16:36 what we have done in the past is removed it from ous 21:17:12 at least, i can see if RHEL will consider updating to the newer setuptools 21:18:03 spot, I have a tracker open with our TAM to have some bugs backported so it is possible that the rhel version will bump in the near future 21:19:23 actually, just checked the repo... looks like python-setuptools was removed from EPEL 21:20:03 nirik: python-setuptools was blocked 21:20:55 its no longer in epel 21:22:00 alright 21:23:12 woah... we're talking seutptools in here too? 21:23:23 abadger1999: its everywhere 21:23:27 I have something to add about that: 21:24:14 Apparently the setuptools that RHEL5 imported doesn't have the python-setuptools-devel virtual provide 21:24:31 abadger1999: doesnt mean we can provide it 21:24:33 So spec files may need to be changed to import python-setuptools when on RHEL <= 5 21:24:46 abadger1999: right 21:25:07 Just an FYI for python/EPEL packagers to be aware of. 21:26:23 anything else? 21:27:13 I think thats all on action items. 21:27:26 #topic Fuse for 5.4 status 21:27:33 rayvd posted a update to the list. 21:28:14 we may want to poke remaining maintainers at some point. 21:29:10 #topic Wiki pages 21:29:22 Are we still doing any clean up on our wiki pages? 21:29:37 the incompatible upgrades policy should probibly loose the draft notice. 21:32:14 I can help with wiki clean up if there were clear goals on what to add/change/etc 21:32:36 though i'm kind of new to the team so not sure if i can add much 21:32:56 wiki cleanup is always hard... 21:33:48 our pages are https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Category:EPEL 21:35:09 I guess if anyone feels like cleaning up any of those pages, please do so. 21:36:11 #topic Open Floor 21:36:22 anything for open floor? shall we change meeting times? anything else? 21:36:39 no open floor items 21:37:00 I think the issue is that we need to work on anything in the mailling list and just do the meetinf as +1/-1 things 21:37:14 if it can't be done on the mailling list.. its not important :) 21:37:50 smooge, not a bad idea... being that over the course of the week most people will hit the thread... rather than making it to this meeting 21:39:13 yeah, mostly there isn't too much exiting in the epel world usually. 21:39:21 we specalize in boring and stable. ;) 21:41:51 was the git update approved? 21:41:58 if we keep git-whatever commands available? 21:42:41 I +1 if we change the spec file to keep compatibility 21:42:45 I was also wondering if communcation for broken updates/general epel stuff should maybe hit identi.ca and twitter 21:43:04 I think more people are apt to follow an epel account than join a ML these days 21:43:27 plus I'd rather overcommunicate if there will be breakage/etc 21:44:11 stahnma, though i hate to admit... twitter always proves to get the word out on important things 21:44:50 soon as the twitispheere starts re-tweeting.... all hell breaks loose, and everyone knows about it whether they wanted to or not 21:46:22 that was my thought basically 21:47:58 * nirik doesn't tweet, so no idea there... 21:48:25 I'm +1 to the git update as long as it keeps compatability. Might also keep it in testing extra long to make sure. 21:48:27 I don't either.. but hey if the kids are doing it these days 21:48:59 nirik, I don't much either but search.twitter.com is useful to know what the world is thinking about a specific topic at any given time 21:49:16 well, what info would we put there? 21:49:20 we don't have much. ;) 21:49:57 nirik, for example: "Incompatible GIT update scheduled for XXXX-XX-XX #rhel #epel" 21:50:10 with a link to the wiki page that explains it 21:50:25 I suppose, but it's not incompatible. ;) 21:50:35 * derks just making an example 21:51:31 yeah, it's a thought. I just am not sure we have enough data to worry about it right now. 21:53:19 or EPEL is fully fully EL5.4 compatible 21:53:23 stuff like that 21:53:28 just idea 21:53:39 anyway, we can close the meeting 21:53:41 :) 21:54:32 ok, I don't have anything else... 21:54:42 Thanks for coming everyone! 21:54:53 nirik, thanks 21:55:02 #endmeeting