05:07:56 #startmeeting i18n 05:07:56 Meeting started Tue Dec 22 05:07:56 2009 UTC. The chair is juhp. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 05:07:56 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #halp #info #idea #link #topic. 05:08:02 hi everyone 05:08:30 sorry for the late starts - was fighting bodhi with unpushing a premature update... 05:08:48 https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/I18N/Meetings/2009-12-22 05:09:00 anyone have agenda to add before we get started? 05:10:56 we have got release schedule for F13 05:11:01 https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/13/Schedule 05:11:02 * juhp slips a few more topic to the agenda list ;) 05:11:05 aha 05:11:16 as per that "2010-01-26 Feature Submission Deadline " 05:11:26 Do anyone have any features for F13? 05:12:14 This time we have got milestones page also 05:12:15 paragan: me - though it is last agenda item currently :) 05:12:18 https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Important_Release_Milestones 05:12:23 though I don't shuffling the order :) 05:12:48 ok 05:12:51 let's do that first then :) 05:13:10 #topic f13 05:13:27 * juhp looks at schedule 05:13:40 so it's official now? :) 05:13:48 yes 05:14:00 but probably little change? 05:14:25 I need to update YumLangPacks.... 05:14:41 I build yum-langpacks in dist-f13 this morning 05:14:57 then just started pondering where to put it in comps... 05:15:15 should we enable for all users by default? 05:15:35 and/or all locales rather? hmm 05:16:00 I think ok for all users and/or locales 05:16:11 paragan, Not quite sure whether my MakerDialog counts. 05:16:12 during the f12 review i was asked about interaction with anaconda, livecd-tools etc 05:16:56 dingyichen: right guess it is new but probably won't be an official feature 05:17:09 juhp: Agree. 05:17:13 dingyichen, ok 05:17:23 I don't think we have proposed any others this time? 05:18:00 from Indic side also we are trying some new locales like Konkani but not sure how much time it will take so no official features 05:18:11 (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/YumLangpackPlugin) 05:18:22 ok sure 05:20:08 interesting yum-presto is only installed by default for gnome?? 05:21:03 I think its because its default package for gnome-desktop group 05:21:26 but not added to kde-desktop group 05:26:23 I see some discussions going on #fedora-devel for yum-langpacks plugin 05:26:37 sorry yeah 05:26:41 let go on anyway 05:27:12 paragan: indeed but makes completely no sense (other than politics;) 05:27:21 yeah 05:28:53 I will try to update the feature page soon 05:29:13 #topic CJK fonts 05:29:45 #action juhp to update https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/YumLangpackPlugin 05:30:04 so wqy-zenhei-fonts is now default in rawhide 05:30:44 and I added the lang fontconfig (well partially for "zh" at least which may be nonsense but anyway) 05:30:57 however still it overrides ja 05:31:07 seems we have to drop 65-nonlatin.conf 05:31:24 which is great since then we can stop arguing about it upstream!! 05:32:30 http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20911 05:32:31 Bug 20911: normal, medium, ---, keithp@keithp.com, NEW, 65-nonlatin should be updated for CJK fonts 05:33:27 ok 05:35:21 I really don't understand benefit of having 65-nonlatin.conf 05:35:38 indeed 05:35:44 me neither :) 05:37:32 hmm if we have .conf file with each font, then why to write fontname again in 65-nonlatin.conf 05:39:51 seems we have to drop 65-nonlatin.conf 05:40:23 http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20911#c88 05:40:26 Bug 20911: normal, medium, ---, keithp@keithp.com, NEW, 65-nonlatin should be updated for CJK fonts 05:40:30 I added a comment 05:40:44 * juhp pulls his flameware a bit closer... 05:41:29 tagoh3: anything new on your fontconfig cleanup stuff? 05:41:41 I read the thread on the list 05:41:55 good that we are taking things upstream more 05:42:25 tagoh3: dunno if there is any pending changes to the cjk fonts still? 05:42:35 anyway 05:42:55 I think kaio also did some updates for cjkuni? 05:43:32 but not pushed yet I guess 05:43:34 juhp☺ which one you referred to? 05:43:46 I dunno ;) yesterday? :) 05:43:57 that reminds me should we have some wiki page for fonts. I see we are seeing changes in Fedora for font names/ new font packages and its confusing now what changes are happening. 05:44:09 juhp☺ it seems that was the problem from oo.o 05:44:16 aha 05:44:35 paragan: i18n page you mean? 05:44:38 but still not confirmed yet, it is quite bizarre still 05:44:50 kaio: what's the problem? 05:44:56 juhp, yes for CJK 05:45:01 like we have https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/I18N/Indic#Fonts_list 05:45:03 paragan: we do :) 05:45:12 https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/I18N/Fonts 05:45:19 now 05:45:20 cjk uming on oowriter, when it is 11px the bold doesnt bold 05:45:51 I tested w/ both with embeddedbitmap and not 05:45:54 but I suppose we have more that one font package for CJK languages 05:45:56 using it for our biweekly fonts meeting from now on 05:46:09 paragan: true we can add more 05:46:17 cool 05:46:17 but those are the important ones anyway 05:46:21 ok 05:46:43 so maybe we need https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/I18N/Fonts/Chinese etc? 05:47:02 if we have some good contents to add there then we should have that :) 05:47:14 with links to individual fonts page perhaps 05:47:18 yeah 05:47:21 dunno ;) 05:47:25 that will be also good 05:47:49 kaio: hmm - new to f12? 05:47:58 bug#? 05:48:24 545824 05:48:29 heh 05:48:35 bug 545824 05:48:36 Bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=545824 medium, low, ---, cchance, NEW, Boldface not working with some sizes 05:51:21 I see 05:51:24 let move on 05:51:26 's 05:51:39 # transifex-0.7 05:51:46 #topic transifex-0.7 05:52:14 I am talking to Fedora Infra about getting the transifex up for public testing soon 05:52:35 https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/ticket/1455 05:52:37 you mean new version? 05:52:43 of course 05:52:48 0.7.3 hopefully 05:52:58 aha 05:53:39 there should be a test environment setup soon and then I will try to help set it up 05:54:07 not too much time left this year but keeping crossed 05:54:10 juhp, are you wanting a formal staging environment or just something set up on a publictest machine (like a temporary one) 05:54:40 nb_: seems formal one is needed - to be honest don't even understand the distinction :) 05:55:10 well staging is more of a permanent test server 05:55:11 nb_: I was in some discussion earlier on #fedora-admin 05:55:17 publictest is a temporary one usually 05:55:23 right 05:55:39 I understand the staging needed to be setup 05:55:49 oh ok 05:55:51 I dunno why publictest is insufficient 05:55:57 maybe for the db?? 05:56:03 is it just to test the new version? 05:56:18 test before pushing to production 05:56:33 so after the upgrade in production is the testing one still going to be needed? 05:56:51 0.7 has a lot of nice new features (and been out for about 2+ months :-/) 05:57:00 probably not - shrug 05:57:23 oh, looks like toshio is working on it 05:57:28 i'll look at it after the meeting 05:57:40 it is the first transifex upgrade I have dabbled in... 05:57:52 i dont really know anything about staging, but ive done things on the publictest ones before 05:57:59 mostly because I want it to happen... 05:58:03 ok 05:58:16 well all help is quite welcome :-) 05:58:17 thanks 05:58:55 I think we talk about kbd/im integration tomorrow 05:58:55 We might be able to do it on publictest. stg more colsely mirrors what we have in production so it's better for testing predeployment. 05:59:10 aha 05:59:43 abadger1999, when we get staging set up, can someone sync the fas database or add me to sysadmin-web on the staging one? IIRC I could never ssh to app1.stg or proxy1.stg 05:59:55 someone said the database might be old or something 06:00:09 * nb_ can try to help juhp with the upgrade 06:00:39 nb_: Yep. If you're not able to after it's setup let me know and I'll resync the db. 06:00:42 nb_: would appreciate that since I need to learn the ropes a bit probably 06:00:54 abadger1999, ok thanks 06:03:17 I just wanted to mention http://blogs.gnome.org/sudaltsov/2009/12/21/kbd-stuff-going-threezero/ which whot pointed out to me 06:03:36 phuang: ^ 06:03:48 hi 06:04:06 anyway can talk on it in the IM meeting.... 06:04:30 #topic bugs 06:04:51 great, noticed kasumi merge review progressing 06:05:28 anyone have any annoying bugs they want to talk about? 06:05:46 I have a workarounds for mine ;) 06:06:11 disable sound effects in rawhide (stops libcanberra hanging metacity;) 06:06:31 and already talked about sudo rm /etc/fonts/conf.d/65-nonlatin.conf ... 06:06:43 juhp: doh. forgot the meeting - well, no. waiting for anyone who can answer my question on f-f-l ;) 06:07:03 ah 06:07:13 tagoh3: what was the question again? 06:07:23 juhp: Latin thing 06:07:33 thing? 06:07:46 coverage 06:08:15 ah 06:08:20 didn't see that yet 06:09:17 * juhp reading 06:10:27 hmm it looks a bit complicated... to me anyway - perhaps we can talk after 06:10:44 sure 06:10:51 sometimes really wish we could just rm conf.d/*.conf ... and start afresh 06:11:50 anything else? 06:11:58 nope 06:16:27 okay 06:17:07 we meet tomorrow on #fedora-i18n for input-methods 06:17:29 next i18n meeting here will be 5th Jan (in fact I will be away) 06:17:40 ok thanks for the meeting guys 06:18:33 #endmeeting