14:04:29 #startmeeting kde-sig -- http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIGs/KDE/Meetings/2010-06-22 14:04:29 Meeting started Tue Jun 22 14:04:29 2010 UTC. The chair is rdieter. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 14:04:29 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #halp #info #idea #link #topic. 14:04:40 #topic roll call 14:04:50 #info thomasj_ rdieter present (so far) 14:04:55 here 14:05:08 * ltinkl is here 14:05:24 Present. 14:05:30 #chair thomasj_ SMParrish ltinkl Kevin_Kofler than_ 14:05:30 Current chairs: Kevin_Kofler SMParrish ltinkl rdieter than_ thomasj_ 14:05:40 * than_ is present 14:05:47 #info SMParrish ltinkl Kevin_Kofler than_ present 14:06:00 #topic agenda 14:06:01 * jreznik is here too 14:06:10 #info jreznik here too 14:06:16 #chair jreznik 14:06:16 Current chairs: Kevin_Kofler SMParrish jreznik ltinkl rdieter than_ thomasj_ 14:06:29 so, not much of an agenda yet for today, topic ideas? 14:06:49 kftpgrabber dewad upstream, remove from Fedora? 14:06:53 dead* 14:08:04 thomasj_: makes sense 14:08:12 can eol for f14 at least 14:08:25 Yeah, what i thought as well 14:09:07 I'm always against removing stuff that works just fine. 14:09:11 it seems we don't have any topic for today` 14:09:15 if we have nothing better to do, can discuss removing the legacy QTDIR-setting scripts from qt3 packaging. heliocastro asked about that a bit earlier in #fedora-kde 14:09:17 I tried to clean up abrt bugs. 14:09:37 Kevin_Kofler: +1 14:09:45 Kevin_Kofler, problem is it crashes and abrt catches it. there are lots of bugreports with no response of upstream since a long time. 14:09:45 But if it crashes all the time, that'd be a reason to drop it. ;-) 14:09:51 kudos to thomasj_ and SMParrish for the bz triaging 14:09:59 #info kudos to thomasj_ and SMParrish for the bz triaging 14:10:13 indeed, great work :) 14:10:20 Thanks meant to warn you when I did the mass bug update. 14:11:03 is there any reason why we remove QTDIR-setting scripts ? 14:11:29 we still need it for qt3 14:12:03 than_: +1 14:12:06 It just breaks things. 14:12:24 (Removing the stuff just breaks things, I mean.) 14:12:43 I don't see what we have to gain from removing QTDIR. 14:13:16 Stuff which looks for Qt 4 in QTDIR is really broken and has always been broken. But I don't see anything important doing that anyway. 14:13:33 QTDIR is Qt 3 and will always be Qt 3. 14:14:25 i'm against removing it 14:14:56 than_: some qt4 apps/scripts expect QTDIR to point to qt4, that's why this came up 14:15:27 I figured we consider removing it for qt3, since it's crufty, legacy stuff 14:15:48 the main reason we set QTDIR, is due to our use of non-standard /usr/lib(64)/qt-3.3 14:16:12 if we dropped QTDIR, and moved stuff to /usr/lib(64)/qt3 , most/everything should continue to work 14:16:27 s/work/build/ 14:16:44 rdieter: Those apps are fixed and need to be broken. 14:16:50 QTDIR has never been Qt 4 and will never be Qt 4. 14:16:59 Qt 4 doesn't need an environment variable at all. 14:17:03 qt docs still reference QTDIR, fwiw 14:17:15 both qt3 and qt4 ones, though 14:17:19 rdieter: it looks like a bug in such qt4 apps/scripts! 14:17:59 I could argue the same about the qt3 apps that will ftbfs without QTDIR being set, they have a bug too 14:18:05 Uh, I mean "Those apps are broken and need to be fixed", of course. ;-) 14:18:34 but if y'all feel it's too much work, and not worth the pain of fixing the possible fallout, fine 14:18:35 rdieter: What else should they use? 14:18:40 Qt 4 supports pkg-config. 14:18:48 In Qt 3, QTDIR was the documented way to find Qt. 14:18:52 Otherwise you can just guess. 14:19:02 i did not see any4 qt apps which needs the QTDIR so far 14:19:23 heliocastro mentioned hitting at least one earlier in #fedora-kde 14:19:41 that QTDIR pointing to qt3 made it fail to build/run 14:19:59 but I also agree with Kevin_Kofler that's a bug in the app 14:20:25 yes it's a bug in the qt4 apps 14:20:37 I would just like the qt3 scripts in /etc/profile.d/ to go away in the foreseeable future, but maybe that's not possible (esp with the $PATH munging going on there) 14:21:35 #topic qt3 legacy /etc/profile.d scripts 14:22:02 seems I'm in tne minority, so let's just leave it alone then 14:22:03 rdieter: qt3 is old and will be removed sometime in the future. 14:22:37 Removing the PATH munging will also break Qt 3 builds. 14:22:54 than_: I think it's going to stay there for a long time, like gtk+ 1. 14:22:59 it doesn't make sense to fix thing which already works 14:23:02 than_: my recent repoquery still showed ~50 pkgs that BR: qt3-devel 14:23:15 sometime in the future... 1 year? 2 years? more? 14:23:26 Indeed, it doesn't make sense to fix something that's not broken. 14:23:58 ~50 apps, WOW 14:24:09 i would say qt3 will be obsoleted in 3 years 14:24:17 I don't think it will. 14:24:20 ok, ugh. 14:24:33 #agreed qt3 is old/legacy, leave it alone (as is possible) until which time it can be removed from the distro (~3 yrs?) 14:24:42 gtk+ 1 is still there and it has been obsolete for what, 5 years? 10 years? 14:24:49 #topic open discussion 14:25:33 Kevin_Kofler: maybe in 10 year ;-) 14:26:48 oh, rumor has it that kde-4.5-rc1 gets tagged tomorrow, who wants to be the tarball/rpm bot tomorrow? :) 14:26:59 i think we can remove it if there's nothing depends on qt3 in fedora 14:28:09 i have not seen any announce on the KDE maiiling list yet 14:28:31 rdieter: I'll see tmrw, I'm busy but I'll try to help 14:28:40 the release schedule has it for tomorrow, but we'll see. 14:28:48 otherwise, I can help with bot-duties as well 14:29:20 #info kde-4.5-rc1 tagging scheduled for Jun 23 14:29:44 anything else? if not, I'll close meeting here in a minute or 2 14:31:51 sounds like not, thanks everyone 14:31:54 Looks like, call it a meeting :) Everyone watches France losing the last game ;) 14:31:54 #endmeeting