23:00:06 #startmeeting Docs Project Meeting - Agenda: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Docs_Project_meetings 23:00:06 Meeting started Wed Jun 30 23:00:06 2010 UTC. The chair is Sparks. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 23:00:06 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #halp #info #idea #link #topic. 23:00:07 #meetingname Fedora Docs 23:00:07 The meeting name has been set to 'fedora_docs' 23:00:07 #topic Roll Call 23:00:12 * rudi is here 23:00:15 * radsy is here 23:00:20 * Sparks is here 23:00:23 * crantila is here 23:00:38 * jjmcd 23:00:48 * joat is here 23:00:51 * dafrito is here 23:01:13 * Johny_V is here 23:01:14 * JustinClift is here 23:01:23 * bethlynn is here 23:02:17 * stickster 23:02:25 Wow, that's an awesome list of contributors! 23:02:51 Let's get started. 23:02:58 #topic Follow up on last week's action items 23:05:20 Grrr... Sorry, my connection just went haywire 23:05:29 * Tsagadai is here :) 23:05:56 Okay 23:06:17 rudi_ and nb to come back with additional information on getting docs-writers building packages in koji for docs.fp.o 23:06:29 rudi: Have you and nb figured out anything on this? 23:06:59 . 23:07:16 I finally cornered the sysadmin who I needed to talk to 23:07:33 And I think I finally have all the facts I need to start hammering out a proposal 23:07:46 I expect to have that written up this week 23:08:19 rudi: Excellent 23:08:35 quaid: Are you here? 23:08:54 Oh, he's NOT here 23:09:01 according to the message on #f-dos 23:09:03 docs 23:09:10 #action quaid to bring to the list a discussion about Beacon and web-based XML editors for Docs use. 23:09:17 #action quaid will kindly ask poelcat to put up taskjuggler schedule sources in a f'hosted repo, pref. git 23:09:34 #action Sparks to discuss bug maintenance on the list 23:09:46 I just need to sit down and write that... I hope to get to that tonight 23:09:53 Sparks Send email to list proposing magazine article work about the guides and docs.fp.o 23:10:02 #link https://fedorahosted.org/marketing-team/ticket/122 23:10:13 I'm working with the Marketing Team on this. 23:10:21 I'll bring more back when I know more. 23:10:29 Sparks to discuss document versioning on the list... when is a doc a certain version? 23:10:37 This is an ongoing discussion on the list... 23:10:47 #topic Do we still need a CMS? 23:11:08 There was some discussion on the list about this topic... 23:11:27 I don't think we've actually come up with a consensus or anything 23:11:39 and I think we're waiting for some feedback from quaid and jjmcd 23:11:52 And I have some work to do on that yet 23:12:00 How about we table this discussion until the end of July? 23:12:17 any problems with that? 23:13:11 #agreed CMS decisions will be tabled until the end of July 23:13:22 #info Discussions continue on the Docs list. 23:13:30 #topic Fedora 14 Schedule 23:13:45 jjmcd: I think you and poelcat have been working on this. 23:13:59 I noticed rudi had a post today, too 23:14:07 I know rudi sent a message to the list earlier but I haven't had a chance to read it yet 23:14:09 So at this point I think we are all waiting on poelcat 23:14:25 rudi: Did you have any input that you'd like to discuss here? 23:14:50 Well I can basically summarize the changes I requested 23:15:12 ok 23:15:25 1. clarified when we would be providing new POTs to L10N and when we would be refreshing them 23:15:36 2. establishing a deadline for branching docs 23:16:17 3. inserted points where we should be making noise on announce-list and devel-list to get eyes on drafts 23:16:32 (and in typing that I just realised we probably want to notify test-list too) 23:16:38 That's it in a nutshell 23:16:50 excellent 23:17:26 Okay, I guess we wait for poelcat 23:17:33 yep 23:17:48 * Sparks notes that poelcat has been very timely on making these changes and has been helping us out quite a bit 23:18:26 Anything else on this topic? 23:18:42 #topic Release Notes 23:19:00 jjmcd: When are you going to start asking for input? 23:19:17 Whenever it shows on the schedule :-) 23:19:35 Okay then 23:19:36 Our trigger is the featrure pages 23:19:36 :) 23:19:45 And that's coming up soon, correct? 23:19:49 although I have asked to add a recruit beat writers and 23:20:00 a notify dev of coming alpha RNs points 23:20:06 I think it is still a few weeks off 23:20:26 But not so many weeks 23:20:40 ya 23:20:46 okay, need anything from me/us? 23:20:56 No, right now my focus is d-p-r 23:21:15 excellent 23:21:19 anyone have anything? 23:21:29 check my planet post today 23:21:33 Thought - whoever does the magazine articles, needs to really make a clear point that people can get their favourite topics written about in the Fedora and RHEL manuals if they're willing to lend a hand. 23:22:11 * jjmcd wonders whether Sparks will need help with that 23:22:18 with the article? 23:22:28 Let's wait until the end of the meeting to discuss that 23:22:32 :) 23:22:39 jjmcd: I'll catch up on the Planet this evening 23:22:43 Okay, moving on 23:22:51 #topic Guide Status 23:23:15 A couple of weeks ago I asked everyone to populate the F14 Goals wiki page 23:23:26 #link https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Docs_Project_guide_goals_for_F14 23:23:47 Lots of great stuff went up on the page 23:24:27 I'd also like to see items being struck through when they are completed 23:24:53 Anyone want to talk about what they are doing with their guide? 23:24:57 . 23:24:58 or anything else they are working on? 23:25:08 crantila: Okay... you have the floor 23:25:38 the Musicians' Guide is progressing, and as of very early this morning, full draft chapters are starting to be completed 23:26:04 I'll be asking in testing@ and #fedora-docs, but any body who would like to help with proof-reading is welcome to join in 23:26:23 https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Crantila/FSC/Testing contains more information, and will be updated as development continues 23:26:47 so if you have a few minutes, please stop by, read a section, and send feedback - thanks! 23:27:05 crantila: are you checking the source into fedorahosted? 23:27:15 crantila: Or... where is the source being stored? 23:27:17 it's all still on the Wiki, in my namespace 23:27:22 Oh 23:27:33 Sparks -- crantila has hosting space organised 23:27:33 conversion to DocBook XML will take place in a few weeks 23:27:42 For when the conversion happens :) 23:27:51 perfect 23:28:11 crantila: could you provide the link here so we'll know where to go snoop? 23:28:52 Sparks -- it's all on the Guides table :) 23:28:54 everything is linked from the page above. When things move onto Trac, I'll link to that, as well 23:29:14 plus the Guides table 23:29:36 #link https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Crantila/FSC 23:29:40 Cool 23:29:45 anyone else? 23:30:49 I'll point out that the translation quick start guide has been updated to include instructions for translating pages in the wiki 23:31:22 Okay, moving on 23:31:33 #topic Outstanding BZ Tickets 23:31:41 #link https://bugzilla.redhat.com/buglist.cgi?query_format=advanced&classification=Fedora&product=Fedora%20Documentation&bug_status=NEW&bug_status=ASSIGNED 23:32:06 #info 105 Active Bugs 23:32:33 #info 28 New Bugs 23:32:59 I was supposed to write something up on the list a couple weeks ago... 23:33:29 but let's do a quick discussion here and then we can move the more-complete-thought to the list for further polishing 23:33:45 Here is my thought: 23:34:05 1) When a ticket comes in it should be assigned to a handler within a week. 23:34:31 This shows the reporter that we are paying attention and care that they reported. 23:34:51 2) Regular (monthly?) updates should be posted to the ticket. 23:35:13 We have some old tickets and I'm not sure that we haven't forgotten about them. 23:35:31 But we need to stay on top of these bugs and show that we are working on them. 23:35:43 Sparks +1 23:35:57 nothing's worse than a bug report that goes ignored 23:36:02 3) Attach the fix to the bug. 23:36:15 That makes sure there is documentation of the fix. 23:36:39 4) Note the bug number in the repo commit. 23:36:58 This allows us to be able to know why we made a change 23:37:10 5) Use the QA. 23:37:45 (bug numbers should also go into the Revision History of the doc) 23:37:52 This is going to be something BIG IMO. There is a field on every ticket with who should be QAing the ticket to make sure that the fix is proper. 23:37:55 rudi: Good point 23:38:03 The problem is no one is doing the QA. 23:38:23 QA could be as simple as a proof reader 23:38:37 but it should be done. 23:38:52 Could we maybe ask on test-list? 23:39:05 6) Offer the fix to the reporter and make sure they are happy/understand the fix. 23:39:08 rudi: We could 23:39:38 If we didn't actually fix the problem then we shouldn't close the ticket. 23:40:03 7) Close the ticket after receiving feedback from the reporter. If no feedback is received close the ticket after 30 days. 23:40:15 Anyone have any input or modifications? 23:40:46 6 should probably use the NEEDINFO flag 23:40:50 * poelcat sees channel highlights and confirms that I will make changes by friday 23:40:59 I like (6), and I wonder if (7) couldn't be 15 days, which seems to be what the rest of FP does 23:41:25 I think if NEEDSINFO is set, it closes automatically after a while? 23:41:41 rudi: I don't think it's automatic 23:41:42 poelcat: Thank you! 23:41:50 I think it's used as a sign for triagers though 23:41:56 At least on the Fedora side 23:42:15 the only auto-close is EOL 23:42:20 crantila: 15 days is fine. I just pulled 30 out the air 23:42:20 Ah OK 23:42:53 Perhaps ON_QA is a better choice? 23:43:09 dafrito: This should be post QA 23:43:16 NEEDSINFO is just a flag, not a state 23:43:19 I think there is a setting after that... right? 23:43:28 Sparks VERIFIED 23:43:52 rudi: There you go 23:44:24 whoever QAs the bug would mark it VERIFIED 23:44:38 then we point it to the reporter who would probably just leave a note 23:44:46 at which point we say CLOSED 23:44:51 correct? 23:44:57 Yeah 23:45:13 * Sparks is glad that zodbot is taking notes 23:45:43 So is that acceptable to everyone? 23:46:20 * Sparks takes the silence to mean it is acceptable 23:46:35 I'll take this to the list to get more eyes on it. 23:46:38 I like it; it's similar how bugs work elsewhere in Fedora, AFAIK 23:46:44 which I think is positive 23:47:07 Next week I'll bring it back one more time to make sure we are all in agreement and then I'll write it up on the wiki and make it "policy" 23:47:11 dafrito: agreed 23:47:26 Anyone else have anything bug related? 23:47:58 #topic Open floor discussion 23:48:10 Someone brought up the article 23:48:34 I talked with rbergeron and she is going to do an interview with me and a couple other people and try to... 23:48:49 get a few stories together that we can publish internally or externally. 23:49:13 #link https://fedorahosted.org/marketing-team/ticket/122 23:49:33 We talked about several ideas including: 23:49:51 * Docs from the perspective of a Fedora user/contributor 23:50:05 * Docs from the perspective of a FLOSS community member 23:50:18 * Docs using Publican and the background on Publican 23:50:45 if anyone would like to make further suggestions adding on to the ticket would be appropriate. 23:51:03 I am interested in being involved as a long time floss community member who landed in fedora docs as a first software project involvement 23:51:14 Oooh -- this could be a great impetus for RyanLerch to finish his comic! 23:51:27 rudi: Definitely. 23:51:28 bethlynn1: You would make a great person to participate, I think 23:51:34 rudi: Yikes 23:51:53 stickster: Agreed 23:52:11 The article(s), if pitched correctly, should be able to get a large number of technical experienced people to contribute. 23:52:14 I've found Fedora to be refreshingly open to participation with people operating under a healthy paradigm of abundance 23:52:21 #action Sparks to add bethlynn1 to the Docs interview ticket 23:52:36 I'm always happy to talk up Publican :) 23:52:56 bethlynn1: well, if that's not a quote to bring out in an article I don't know what is 23:53:07 rudi: I pointed rbergeron towards you and Jeff. 23:53:13 Cool :) 23:53:41 Can we make suggestions for how to pitch the article to get more contributors? 23:54:04 JustinClift: Sure. I'll direct you to rbergeron who is heading up this project. 23:54:11 * Sparks is just a pawn in this game 23:54:19 k 23:54:45 Okay, anyone have anything else? 23:54:58 that sounds like a great idea :) 23:55:03 stickster: I have a question for you. 23:55:51 stickster: Since you are changing roles... does this mean we'll get more work out of you here where your roots lay? 23:56:14 Sparks: Unfortunately, not likely -- most of my job is going to lie in the RHEL side of the house 23:56:17 I can report on my TLC for SELinux but I can do that in the -docs channel 23:56:50 TLC? 23:57:00 * bethlynn1 notes that we've got 3 minutes left 23:57:08 stickster: Well, as long as you don't forget about us... :) 23:57:09 tender loving care 23:57:13 Oh! 23:57:17 * stickster will always be around to pitch in here and there :-) 23:57:37 bethlynn1: you can give us a summary! 23:57:45 I feel like the Docs team has really found its own critical mass that enjoys a life separate from us "old guys" 23:58:10 then why is jjmcd still around? 23:58:13 :) 23:58:16 :-) 23:58:32 Because you haven't found anyone dumb enough to take the release notes 23:58:45 jjmcd: That's valid 23:58:56 jjmcd: But since quaid isn't here tonight... 23:59:04 quaid encouraged me to post to -marketing list and marketing wiki... so I did. That got Dan Walsh's attention but Dan is on vacation until mid July 23:59:36 bethlynn1: Got a link? 23:59:50 https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Marketing_SeLinux 00:00:01 #link https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Marketing_SeLinux 00:00:21 bethlynn1: So I guess you'll be following up with Dan then. 00:00:50 Yeah, Dan's on a hard-earned vacation but when he returns, I hooked them up 00:00:59 excellent 00:01:05 okay, we are out of time! 00:01:07 yup. We setup a time to talk about it: July 16 00:01:08 bethlynn1: Dan's a great guy and loves helping people get the most out of SELinux 00:01:20 Of course, you met him at SELF so you know that :-) 00:01:20 I really appreciate everyone's participation tonight! Great crowd! 00:01:30 do we need to get outta here... 00:01:39 * bethlynn1 feels the gong coming 00:01:49 Yep, the gong is coming 00:01:50 the cleaning crew is waiting outside 00:02:06 further discussion and doughnuts served in #fedora-docs 00:02:09 Thanks everyone! 00:02:13 #endmeeting