#fedora-meeting: Fedora 14 Alpha Go / No-Go meeting #1

Meeting started by adamw at 00:00:58 UTC (full logs).

Meeting summary

    1. QA representative = adamw, releng representative = dgilmore, devel representative = nirik (adamw, 00:03:44)
    2. general busybody = jsmith (adamw, 00:03:59)
    3. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/showdependencytree.cgi?id=611990&hide_resolved=1 (adamw, 00:04:43)
    4. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_14_Alpha_RC3_Install (adamw, 00:05:16)
    5. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_14_Alpha_RC3_Desktop (adamw, 00:05:20)
    6. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_14_Alpha_Release_Criteria (adamw, 00:05:45)

  2. tty bugs (adamw, 00:07:28)
    1. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=623102 (adamw, 00:07:41)
    2. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=623102 (adamw, 00:07:47)
    3. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=623430 (adamw, 00:07:55)
    4. AGREED: tty1 issues should not block Alpha, we have a broad consensus for a generic release criteria proposal to move forward on after the meeting (adamw, 00:16:15)

  3. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=623213 (adamw, 00:16:40)
    1. AGREED: an intentional conflict which cannot cause problems with any interactive package selection method should not be a blocker, we will propose a tightening of the relevant release criterion and install test (adamw, 00:20:52)

  4. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=621027 (adamw, 00:22:08)
    1. AGREED: broad consensus that artwork criteria should kick in at beta stage, this bug should not block alpha (adamw, 00:25:44)

  5. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=620623 (adamw, 00:25:58)
    1. AGREED: this is fixed for rc3, so close it: if more dependency problems are found in potential later builds, it can be reopened (adamw, 00:27:40)

  6. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=623129 (adamw, 00:28:24)
    1. AGREED: 623129 should be an alpha blocker, we will propose a release criterion that the 'basic video driver' option must work at alpha stage, and this will slip the Alpha release by one week. (adamw, 00:37:35)

  7. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=596985 (adamw, 00:37:57)
    1. AGREED: not enough data to assess whether 596985 is a blocker, we will continue to gather data and reassess at next blocker meeting (adamw, 00:44:52)
    2. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=621414 HD installed with anaconda 14.15 live RC3.1 CD? reverts to internal older fedora if preset on PC HD if using USB external HD install of F14 ? (satellit_, 00:45:27)

  8. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=621414 (adamw, 00:47:55)
    1. AGREED: 621414 is not accepted as a blocker (adamw, 00:51:19)

  9. what fixes to accept for rc4 (adamw, 00:51:35)
    1. AGREED: we will definitively decide which fixes to take later, but there's interest in taking fixes for the tty issues and artwork if they become available in time for rc4 compose (adamw, 01:00:29)

  10. open floor (adamw, 01:00:54)
    1. ACTION: jsmith to send slip announcement (jsmith, 01:02:20)
    2. ACTION: jsmith to send slip announcement (adamw, 01:02:57)
    3. ACTION: adamw to update bug reports with decisions agreed here (adamw, 01:03:11)
    4. ACTION: adamw to co-ordinate wider testing of radeon issue (adamw, 01:03:19)
    5. ACTION: poelcat to update schedule(s) to reflect the slip (adamw, 01:04:14)
    6. ACTION: adamw/poelcat to organize another blocker review meeting (adamw, 01:04:33)
    7. AGREED: we will try to get anaconda fix built and tested and a full compose done tomorrow to be rc4 (adamw, 01:08:54)


Meeting ended at 01:12:32 UTC (full logs).

Action items

  1. jsmith to send slip announcement
  2. jsmith to send slip announcement
  3. adamw to update bug reports with decisions agreed here
  4. adamw to co-ordinate wider testing of radeon issue
  5. poelcat to update schedule(s) to reflect the slip
  6. adamw/poelcat to organize another blocker review meeting


Action items, by person

  1. adamw
    1. adamw to update bug reports with decisions agreed here
    2. adamw to co-ordinate wider testing of radeon issue
    3. adamw/poelcat to organize another blocker review meeting
  2. jsmith
    1. jsmith to send slip announcement
    2. jsmith to send slip announcement
  3. poelcat
    1. poelcat to update schedule(s) to reflect the slip
    2. adamw/poelcat to organize another blocker review meeting


People present (lines said)

  1. adamw (222)
  2. jsmith (71)
  3. j_dulaney (56)
  4. nirik (55)
  5. poelcat (35)
  6. dgilmore (33)
  7. onekopaka_laptop (14)
  8. zodbot (12)
  9. fenris02 (6)
  10. satellit_ (6)
  11. Oxf13 (4)
  12. tk009 (3)
  13. jds2001 (3)
  14. rdieter (1)


Generated by MeetBot 0.1.4.