20:00:27 #startmeeting Infrastructure 20:00:27 Meeting started Thu Aug 26 20:00:27 2010 UTC. The chair is mmcgrath. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 20:00:27 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #halp #info #idea #link #topic. 20:00:30 #meetingname infrastructure 20:00:30 The meeting name has been set to 'infrastructure' 20:01:05 #topic who's here? 20:01:15 * nirik is lurking around. 20:01:15 here 20:01:18 * wulfin is here 20:02:57 Ok, lets get started 20:03:01 #topic Infrastructure -- The release 20:03:07 I think everything went well 20:03:10 had a few link misshaps 20:03:26 sijis: did we get whatever docs updated that we needed to to make sure the link thing doesn't happen again? 20:04:33 * jsmith was very happy with the job infrastructure did with the alpha release 20:04:58 * mmcgrath assumes sijis is busy at the moment 20:05:00 jsmith: thanks 20:05:06 anyone have anything else related to the release? 20:05:53 ok 20:05:55 #topic FAS update 20:06:01 I'm working on deploying the new fas version 20:06:10 everything has been fine so far except bodhi, which errors on login for some reason. 20:06:20 I just pinged lmacken to see if he has any ideas (like just seconds ago pinged him) 20:06:24 mmcgrath: What's the reason for the change, for those of us who haven't been following? 20:06:33 jsmith: the fas update? 20:06:51 mmcgrath: Yes 20:07:15 the older version of sqlalchemy is no longer going to be supported so we've had to change to a newer version, which caused a massive rewrite of the data layer of the app 20:07:28 which also caused alchemy issues with older versions of turbogears 20:07:42 so to fix it without being too hackish we're updating RHEL6 and fas at the same time on the fas servers. 20:08:03 this new version also has some basic fixes as well as the invite-only stuff tibbs put together 20:08:09 Cool 20:08:17 oh meeting. I'm here-ish 20:08:19 I'm in class 20:08:25 is the plan to move fas to tg2 at some point? 20:08:52 krich: it is 20:09:16 though we're in research mode on that. we have a custom identity provider since fas is an identity provider which has made that a little difficult 20:09:21 but I'm confident we'll get there 20:09:42 cool 20:09:53 anyone have any questions or concerns there? 20:10:09 * mmcgrath notes krich has started helping me with FAS 20:10:14 much appreciated krich 20:10:31 no prob ... look forward to getting into it 20:10:48 * smooge wonders if tg3 will occur just as we get to tg2 20:10:48 ok 20:10:57 #topic staging 20:11:01 cool thanks krich 20:11:01 I rebuilt all of staging last week 20:11:05 smooge: no, I'm quite confident that it won't :) 20:11:06 yeah! 20:11:24 the build system still doesn't quite work but I'm hoping to get to that this week / next week sometime. 20:11:30 all in all it went well 20:11:32 mmcgrath, thanks 20:11:34 I was pleased by that. 20:11:50 As part of that, we also have xen13 running RHEL6(ish) and is running kvm 20:11:54 so all of staging is in kvm 20:11:59 so far so good, we've hit a few bumps here and there 20:12:03 mmcgrath, I was wondering.. could we rename app01 to bapp01 since its more bapp01 than app01? 20:12:07 a couple of weird oops's we didn't see before for example. 20:12:13 oh wait, what were the bumbps? 20:12:18 kernel oops? 20:12:36 smooge: it's just as much an app1 as a bapp1 so no, lets just keep it. If we feel we need a bapp1 (people have requested it) then we can build a bapp1. 20:12:43 smooge: yeah 20:12:52 * sijis is around.. sorry 20:12:53 it's happened to app1, proxy1 and I think the db server. 20:13:00 though it hasn't happened recently 20:13:06 and one morning I came in and app1 was paused 20:13:15 sijis noticed it was down so I went to look and sure enough, paused :) 20:13:28 so just stuff to keep an eye on 20:13:39 we're both new to KVM and RHEL6 and since RHEL6 itself is new... there you have it 20:13:48 any questions / comments on that? 20:13:57 mmcgrath, ok the big issue was dealing with updates on app01 but since app01.stg is probably EL6 now... it is probably not a big deal 20:14:14 app01.stg is RHEL5.5 20:14:18 ah ok 20:14:24 so it has the funky rpm on it 20:14:29 naw only fas01.stg has been upgraded to RHEL6 20:14:48 we're generally not upgrading to RHEL6 unless there's a reason to at this point (like fas and it's alchemy dep 20:14:53 ok sorry. 20:15:01 any other questions / comments on staging? 20:15:13 none. I will work on a bapp01 next week 20:15:38 #topic zarafa 20:15:44 so I got zarafa up and running for our calendaring 20:15:52 I've run into an issue making it highly available. 20:16:03 it's a multi part issue and I'm not 100% sure what I'm going to do to fix it at this point. 20:16:28 but I'll keep testing things and see how it goes. 20:16:43 how does one access it ? via admin like community? 20:16:47 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/zarafa/ 20:16:55 that's where it is in production, staging in its normal spot. 20:17:05 don't rely on it for anything yet, I may wipe the database at any moment. 20:17:14 no problem. 20:17:25 but do poke around and see what all you can see 20:17:45 ugh, gives me the Outlook chills 20:17:46 will not have all my fedora mail go there either :) 20:18:03 lmacken: :) that is part of their design 20:18:14 it's got full outlook support and all that AFAIK 20:18:18 I haven't tested that though 20:18:22 it's also got an ical and cal-dav interface 20:18:38 which is exposed right now but I need to put docs together on how to create a URI and point to it 20:18:47 Anyone have any questions or comments on that? 20:19:22 ok 20:19:26 well that's all I had for this meeting 20:19:30 #topic Open Floor 20:19:36 anyone have anything they'd like to discuss? 20:19:40 let me follow up on your initial question 20:19:46 sijis: sure 20:20:00 i haven't updated the websites_release_SOP 20:20:06 i will do it tonight 20:20:16 sijis: much appreciated 20:20:26 sorry about those busted links on release day 20:20:27 my bad 20:20:28 sijis did a good job with the release 20:20:37 yes 20:20:37 sijis: no worries, your first time though went pretty darn well IMHO 20:20:51 thanks :) 20:21:13 no other websites issues either, except updating the release notes to the proper location 20:21:43 cool 20:21:51 anyone have anything else they'd like to discuss? 20:22:16 just a quick question ... does anyone have some time right after this to talk about fas 20:22:33 looking for a high level arch or just a quick q&a 20:22:38 krich: I can, lmacken and I will be talking about other fas stuff. sure 20:22:45 Ok, if no one has anything else we'll close in 30 20:23:46 #endmeeting