23:00:11 #startmeeting Docs Project Meeting - Agenda: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Docs_Project_meetings 23:00:11 Meeting started Wed Sep 1 23:00:11 2010 UTC. The chair is Sparks. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 23:00:11 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #halp #info #idea #link #topic. 23:00:11 #meetingname Fedora Docs 23:00:11 The meeting name has been set to 'fedora_docs' 23:00:11 #topic Roll Call 23:00:16 * Sparks is here 23:00:39 * jjmcd 23:01:12 * gomix waves 23:01:56 * rudi is here 23:03:13 * jjmcd wonders how many headed to NC to watch the waves 23:03:55 i am! 23:03:56 jjmcd: Well, Hatteras Island is closed unless you are a resident and Ocracoke Island is closed, period... so you probably won't get to see any good waves. 23:04:03 oh, wait, too far :) 23:04:17 * Sparks gives everyone some time to get here. 23:06:00 Okay, lets get started... 23:06:07 #topic Follow up on last week's action items 23:06:22 frostbite will help Gearoid with screen readers and the Accessibility Guide 23:06:41 There was a message on the Docs list from frostbite saying that he was working with him on this. 23:06:54 jjmcd to check on/update/expand process page that bethlynn worked on 23:06:58 jjmcd: Did you work on that? 23:07:04 yes 23:07:13 Still coiuld use more feedback\. 23:07:21 https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Docs_Project_workflow_-_beat_writing 23:07:27 #link https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Docs_Project_workflow_-_beat_writing 23:07:27 Okay. Care to put that out on the list? 23:07:34 Already did 23:07:42 and got a little feedback 23:07:45 * Sparks must have missed it 23:07:52 But I suspect most haven't had a look 23:08:44 Okay 23:08:54 Sparks to talk with rbergeron and mo about who will handle the Release Announcements 23:09:06 O/ docs-men 23:09:29 And I haven't done that, yet. 23:09:34 #action Sparks to talk with rbergeron and mo about who will handle the Release Announcements 23:09:56 #topic Release Notes 23:10:09 Not much to report 23:10:12 jjmcd: Okay, what's happening with the Release Notes 23:10:15 No? 23:10:19 I have begun filling in unclaimed beats 23:10:33 Certainly welcome anyone to grab anything unclaimed 23:11:00 The situation isn't all that bad. Most of the unclaimed beats seem to have little interesting happening 23:11:12 This week we need to get working on the conversion 23:11:23 but with mw-render that isn't a big deal 23:11:40 Proably the toughest part is simply doing the branch 23:11:47 So that's about that 23:12:29 questions/comments? 23:12:33 jjmcd -- I'll take care of the TN branching -- 23:12:39 thanks rudi 23:12:41 I have some ideas to make L10N easier 23:12:59 cool - I just responded to your spanish post 23:13:00 I can also hold your hand for RN branching, but won't do it :) 23:13:17 (better that these skills get spread around some!) 23:13:18 uitstekend 23:13:40 Okay, anything else? 23:13:53 If anyone wants some experience with mw-render 23:14:01 I would be happy to teach 23:15:14 heh 23:15:32 Okay, thanks for the update. 23:15:49 #topic Working with non-English sources 23:16:08 This came up this morning on IRC. 23:16:44 I wrote up a process and sent it to the Docs list. 23:16:59 My main question is what are the odds that the Polish translators are fluent in Spanish 23:17:25 Requires a whole new skillset of L10N 23:17:30 ! 23:17:33 jjmcd -- they don't need to be; as long as they can refer to an English translation 23:17:55 Which is what my process had in it. 23:17:56 remember that the strings are 1:1 in every language 23:18:01 So Sparks' more complex process is a little closer to reality than yours 23:18:23 Except that my suggested process keeps a single source for the doc 23:18:49 But the translator doesn't see the English text to be translated 23:18:54 Yes, probably no point in a second source 23:18:55 The other way, we have two sources that can easily slip out of sync 23:19:14 Just that probably the English needs to be mostly done for many of the others to progress 23:19:20 jjmcd -- indeed 23:19:42 jjmcd: Can you write up the process and include the pretty pictures? 23:19:58 Sparks! You haven't mastered dot yet? 23:20:12 jjmcd: I haven't and I also haven't found the time! 23:20:13 Yes,we can put something together 23:20:30 Not a lot to learn, really. Your email is about 90% of it 23:21:18 #action jjmcd to document the process of translating non-English source guides 23:21:39 Okay, anything else? 23:22:05 #topic Guide Status 23:22:23 #link https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Docs_Project_guide_goals_for_F14 23:22:37 Anyone have anything, guide-related, to discuss? 23:22:52 All quiet here 23:23:46 heh 23:23:55 Okay, moving on, then! 23:24:08 #topic Outstanding BZ Tickets 23:24:17 #link http://tinyurl.com/lbrq84 23:24:54 #info 93 open bugs 23:24:57 * nb 23:25:31 nb: Got anything for us? 23:25:45 * nb has something for the end 23:25:49 ok 23:25:53 * nb just got online :) 23:26:13 Anyone have anything regarding bugs? 23:26:35 Just a reminder that now is stomping time 23:26:41 Yes! 23:26:46 With F14 branching a week away... 23:27:16 Okay, moving on. 23:27:23 #topic Open floor discussion 23:27:29 Okay, anyone have anything? 23:28:13 nb: ? 23:28:26 * nb notes the addition in FAS of an invite only option 23:28:41 * nb proposes making docs-writers and docs-publishers invite only (this just means they need to ask a sponsor for membership) 23:28:50 nb: Yes... 23:28:52 that it won't make a big queue to clean out of people applying that we've never heard of 23:28:54 I was just going to ask that. 23:29:02 * nb would also go for making docs invite only, but not sure if we want to, but im in favor 23:29:36 Dunno 23:29:44 I can set up a message that will show up saying email docs@lists.fedoraproject.org if you want to join 23:29:58 We've gotten some good folks who applied to docs, then got an email explaining the self-intro thing 23:30:05 hmm, true 23:30:05 Definitely the docs-writers and docs-publishers 23:30:23 jjmcd, how about leaving docs normal, and making -writers and -publishers invite only? 23:30:25 that was my first thought 23:30:31 Sparks, yes, absolutely, although not as big a win on the mainetntnace side as docs 23:30:40 yeah 23:30:44 Yes definitely those 2 23:30:46 a lot of projects are making invite only 23:30:53 I'm flop-flopping on docs, tho 23:31:02 gitfedora-web is invite only, but we are leaving web normal for now, all sysadmin and sysadmin-* are invite only 23:31:05 I can see both sides 23:31:08 packager and provenpackager are invite only now 23:31:22 jjmcd, true 23:31:26 nb: Can you send an email to the Docs list discussing the invite-only for Docs? 23:31:40 PROPOSAL: Make docs-writers and docs-publishers invite only, discuss the status of docs on the list 23:31:48 Sparks, true 23:32:07 Sparks, sure i mean :) 23:32:12 +1 to invite-only for docs-writers and docs-publishers 23:32:35 #action nb to send an email to the Docs list discussing invite-only status on Docs. 23:32:43 Anyone else going to vote? 23:32:57 * nb is +1 of course since he proposed it :) 23:33:01 Not sure where I stand on this -- is the queue a problem? 23:33:21 rudi, sometimes 23:33:48 rudi, not really, i just go through it every once in a while and remove everyone who is pending, but then i usually get a few emails because the email that fas sends is badly worded and says that "their membership has been removed" 23:34:04 and they want to know why, and then i have to email back and say well, you were never approved in the first place, please send us an introduction, etc 23:34:09 Ah OK 23:34:26 +1 in that case; also because we're moving towards writers=ability to package 23:34:38 and this brings us in line with packaging 23:34:52 jjmcd, i take it that you are +1 to -writers and -publishers invite only from your comments earlier? 23:35:07 if so, i think its unanimous (unless someone else wants to speak) 23:35:27 correct 23:35:54 #agreed docs-writers and docs-publishers groups will be set to "invite only" 23:36:10 they will also have a note on the group page about to email the list if you want membership 23:36:17 #action nb to set docs-writers and docs-publishers groups to invite-only. 23:36:18 or to email docs-writers-sponsors 23:36:19 whivhever 23:36:29 whichever i mean 23:36:43 probably the list 23:36:50 yeah, that way it goes in the archives 23:37:34 Okay, anything else? 23:37:41 not from me 23:37:54 Okay, anything else from anyone else? 23:38:34 Well.... that's all I have. 23:38:40 Thanks everyone for coming tonight. 23:38:49 oh, i need to get with rudi about the website still, a staging branch or something 23:39:07 nb: in -docs after the meeting? 23:39:13 yeah 23:39:16 rudi: 23:39:24 ack 23:39:28 excellent 23:39:38 If there's nothing else... 23:40:12 #endmeeting