05:04:42 #startmeeting i18n 05:04:42 Meeting started Thu Nov 18 05:04:42 2010 UTC. The chair is tagoh. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 05:04:42 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #halp #info #idea #link #topic. 05:04:50 #meetingname i18n 05:04:50 The meeting name has been set to 'i18n' 05:05:01 #topic agenda 05:05:09 http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/I18N/Meetings/2010-11-18 05:05:49 who else here? 05:05:52 hi 05:05:57 hi 05:06:45 hi 05:07:05 hi 05:07:12 hi 05:07:46 let's get started 05:08:13 #topic F15 05:08:19 hi 05:10:01 hi 05:10:05 rawhide installs and boots now 05:10:07 well, wasn't higher priority but most ibus-* rebuilt done, we still have two packages required to rebuild 05:10:15 ibus-fbterm and ibus-sunpinyin 05:11:32 dychen_: I see someone fixed the ibus-chewing scriptlets 05:14:45 aside from that, we have about two months remained for feature submission though, wonder if we have anything? 05:15:17 I think we need to improve ibus on gnome-shell at least 05:15:28 right 05:15:36 at least fix the current problems at a minimum 05:15:50 should we do that with some milestone and clarify that on the feature page say? 05:16:33 yeah that would make sense perhaps 05:17:00 fujiwarat: how do you think? 05:18:51 alternatively we could use a tracker bug perhaps 05:19:36 mclasen pointed me at http://live.gnome.org/GnomeShell/Design/Guidelines/SystemStatus/InputLanguage 05:19:39 sure. anyway making some milestones to improve/fix would be nice. 05:19:47 yep 05:19:53 agree 05:20:28 juhp, great 05:20:58 fujiwarat: do you want to create the page on the fedora wiki say? 05:21:00 juhp: any progress on that? 05:21:30 not that i know 05:22:11 petersen: Do you mean the wiki for gnome-shell and ibus? 05:23:53 that may be one of milestones. may be good to be "ibus improvements" or something like that for generic improvements on ibus? 05:24:21 fujiwarat: above link is some upstream feature page - we are thinking a page specific for tracking ibus integration for gnoe-shell in F15 05:24:59 it could also be a feature page ideally 05:25:11 guess it depends on the scope, etc 05:25:34 at the very minimum I think we need a fedora tracking bug 05:26:49 but maybe you feel it is better to do the work in ibus upstream? 05:27:12 juhp: I think probably it's good to have a fedora wiki. 05:27:12 any other thoughts? 05:27:16 yeah 05:28:44 I just tried to update gnome-shell only but it's still have the dependency problems of java scripts. I'll try to get whole the rawhide. 05:28:45 perhaps we need another meeting to scope the project? 05:28:57 ok 05:29:05 juhp: sure. sounds good 05:29:18 hi 05:29:47 ok 05:30:06 ok, set another meeting and talk more on it later. 05:30:24 better move on. 05:30:34 #topic Package Updates 05:32:00 anything? 05:32:46 need karma on https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/iok-1.3.12-1.fc14 05:32:50 not from me - except I became a provetester :) 05:32:56 -n- 05:33:00 dunno if it's feasible but may be good to have a small tool to pick up the relevant packages to us from bodhi. 05:33:06 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/m17n-contrib-1.1.12-2.fc14,m17n-db-1.6.2-1.fc14,m17n-lib-1.6.2-1.fc14 05:33:08 yeah 05:33:09 juhp: congrats! 05:35:16 any volunteers for above testing would be appreciated. 05:35:18 paragn: I can try to test later/tomorrow perhaps - they have 0 karma? 05:35:30 yes 05:35:47 I usually test my own updates too :) 05:36:02 I think it encourage others to test too 05:36:31 juhp: is the count for proventesters valid with your own? :) 05:37:07 tagoh: heh - good question dunno :) 05:37:18 I have seen very less response to i18n packages for karma 05:37:23 probably, shrug :) 05:37:43 so decided I will push less updates or will keep them in testing 05:38:13 I'm usually waiting for 1 week to make it stable ;) 05:38:20 but anyway 05:38:30 me too 05:38:36 and self-test 05:39:17 anything else packages need more attentions? 05:39:37 otherwise let's move on. 05:40:14 #topic F12 bugs cleanup 05:40:38 since we missed this topic in the last meeting, I changed the order of the agenda to discuss more on it 05:41:01 we still have 15 bugs assigned to f12. 05:41:24 aha 05:41:49 good to have a little time to revisit them, testing and consider to close or change the version for the fix. 05:43:54 yeah 05:44:58 just for spotlight it since we don't have enough time to discuss here. would be nice to be 0 bugs till next meeting. 05:45:11 F12 eols on 2 Dec btw 05:45:57 thanks 05:46:33 if you have own bugs there, please test it again. otherwise any volunteers are welcome. 05:46:59 ok 05:47:04 I'll go through the list later too 05:47:26 #topic Fonts and Rendering 05:48:03 not too much changes made in even bugs though 05:48:21 i am trying to test harfbuzz-ng 05:48:28 * juhp is looking at http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/xmlgraphics/fop/tags/fop-1_0/README 05:48:37 i am thinking to call hb_shape from ftstring 05:49:01 so presently just understanding ftstring code, so calling hb shape appropriately 05:49:05 pravins: aha 05:49:31 but some of my concepts are not clear, so i will ping you some time for it 05:49:51 hb_shape of new harfbuzz-ng 05:50:46 ok 05:50:50 thanks 05:51:13 next week i will work on lohit devanagari and resolve all open bugs 05:51:33 also nice to triage NEW bugs for lohit? ah, ok, cool 05:51:58 sure, most of them for rawhide 05:52:09 ok 05:52:15 i did able to reproduce https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=591556 05:52:57 hinting stuff, will check once again this next week (trail and error) 05:53:04 liberation font 05:53:18 good 05:54:23 ok, shall we move on? 05:54:28 yep 05:54:34 #topic ibus xkb 05:55:15 okay this is carried over from last week I guess 05:55:15 hm, just borrowed the agenda from the last meeting ;) 05:55:53 dunno if there is anything new on ibus or input to discuss? :) 05:56:25 perhaps we could also use this slot to track gnome3 progress etc 05:56:32 right 05:56:48 juhp: Are you able to use ibus in rawhide? 05:57:53 I'd like to get feedback about 530711 05:57:59 fedbot: bug 530711 05:58:03 fujiwarat: yes 05:58:12 aha 05:58:19 Which default is prefered? 05:58:29 I mean ibus-setup. 05:58:41 https://github.com/fujiwarat/ibus/commit/ee49f6f7c15305a9344c8496d937a13f8d42187d 05:58:49 I suggest use user customized mode by default. It is same with current logic. 05:59:26 you mean default for "Customize active input methods"? 05:59:35 It would be great if I can get any feedback about this after the meeting :). 05:59:43 juhp: Yes exactly. 05:59:47 I see 06:00:04 fujiwarat: what does off mean actually? just list default ime for locale? 06:00:51 Yes, off mean the preload engines are calculated by every login. 06:01:06 ok 06:01:19 fujiwarat: how about off if there an engine otherwise on? 06:02:19 fujiwarat: anyway I like the feature 06:02:24 off is customize mode. If the preload engine is NULL, the list is calculated by locale. 06:02:43 The off would be compatible with the previous ibus. 06:02:47 ok I mean checkbox is off but anyway 06:03:24 Do you like off is default? If yes, it's same with phuang. 06:03:32 so i mean default to custom mode if there are no engines for the curret locale 06:04:12 OK, I have another thought but now I'm convinced :). 06:04:27 thx 06:04:40 thanks 06:05:30 hope I was clear :) 06:05:31 ok, anything else? 06:06:56 or anything you want to bring up before finishing the meeting? 06:08:50 ok, thanks everyone for the meeting. 06:09:23 #endmeeting