20:01:26 #startmeeting infrastructure 20:01:26 Meeting started Thu Dec 2 20:01:26 2010 UTC. The chair is smooge. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 20:01:26 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #halp #info #idea #link #topic. 20:01:36 #meeting name infrastructure 20:01:43 #meetingname infrastructure 20:01:43 The meeting name has been set to 'infrastructure' 20:01:51 #chairs mmcgrath smooge 20:02:01 #chair mmcgrath 20:02:01 Current chairs: mmcgrath smooge 20:02:32 #topic Roll Call 20:02:33 * nirik is here. 20:02:36 smooge is here 20:02:40 here 20:02:49 * waltJ is here 20:03:10 * ninjazjb here (kind of) 20:03:18 here 20:04:50 #topic Old Items 20:05:07 nirik, this would probably cover old tickets 20:05:11 ok. 20:05:31 as I mentioned on the list, I'm going to try and dredge through old tickets. 20:05:38 we have currently 323 tickets open. 20:05:50 hi 20:05:51 meeting 20:05:53 * skvidal is here 20:05:54 sorry 20:06:08 If folks could take a few minutes to look at all the ones they are currently assigned to and close any that don't matter or are done, etc that would be great. 20:06:10 * mdomsch 20:06:33 otherwise I wil try and figure out how to route some, or get movement or the like on them over the next few weeks. 20:06:35 there's a few that go back to fedora 12 which should be closed now no? 20:06:53 nirik: I can help a bit on this project 20:06:54 depends. Some might need to just be updated for current if they still matter. 20:06:56 link to the tickets? 20:06:58 goozbach: cool. ;) 20:07:02 b/c I can never find the darn thing 20:07:06 https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/report/1 20:07:08 thx 20:07:25 there's this query for meeting tickets too 20:07:29 https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/query?status=new&status=assigned&status=reopened&keywords=~meeting&keywords=~meet&order=priority 20:07:40 maybe we could add a new report with that query 20:07:43 * ke4qqq shows up a bit late 20:07:51 or https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/report/8 might be helpfull. as that shows your assigned tickets first 20:07:55 goozbach: yeah, good idea. 20:07:59 * mmcgrath is sort of here 20:08:18 I tried to make a report I guess I don't have access to that 20:08:37 yeah, needs admin. 20:08:55 I am trying to get a new report built but my sql sucked 20:09:11 really... like I had puked perl 20:09:16 I can add one if someone can add me to admin. I setup the fesco trac a while back to do that. 20:09:31 if I can get a sponsor to get needed access I can do that 20:09:34 ok will do so after meeting 20:09:49 I have to see what needs to be done and who can do what. 20:09:57 * nirik is happy to let goozbach do it, and assist them. 20:10:02 I will sponsor goozbach to test after meeting 20:10:14 smooge: ty 20:10:56 I would also like any tickets that look important to have a meeting tag added to them so that the front page will get them 20:11:07 thank you nirik and goozbach for doing this 20:11:40 no prob. 20:11:48 no problem I don't have much project time, but I can do administriva in short spurts during $DAYJOB 20:12:14 I will go through the list of items in the queue from yesterday 20:12:21 #topic Upgrading puppet 20:13:17 I'm here; sorry, completely forgot 20:13:19 I am trying to get publictest01 rebuilt so it can be a test puppet server. We will then use publictest03 as the client 20:13:52 Todays luck with a) KVM and b) xen have been shitty to say the least so it will take me a bit 20:14:09 does that mean our puppet config will be effectively out in the open? 20:14:48 not that I think. ricky did this in the past so I am going to ask what he did 20:15:10 if it looks like it might be then we will review and redo 20:15:28 we should lock down who all has access to pt01 then (limit it to groups with access to puppet01) if we're testing with prod configs 20:15:31 or limit it to just a few people onto the box 20:17:18 we will want a project plan of some sort and steps to deal with it before going much further. 20:17:53 however due to puppet being only supported on the 2.6 tree it will need to be done at some point 20:18:09 #topic Monthly upgrades. 20:18:20 ok we are out of freeze and have a lot of upgrades to do. 20:18:30 skvidal mentioned he would spearhead this 20:18:40 yes 20:18:43 upgrades 20:18:50 I just reran func-yum getinfo 20:18:56 and we have a lot of boxes which need a lot of love 20:19:03 my plan looks something like this at the moment 20:19:06 yep pretty much everything 20:19:14 smooge: sorry, i have to take off 20:19:18 1. hit the boxes which are not likely to be updated to rhel6 first - so that means the rhel6 boxes :) 20:19:44 2. sift the rhel5 list and apply security updates asap 20:19:52 3. everything else 20:20:14 sound exciting? 20:20:32 ninjazjb, catch up later 20:20:37 tomorrow morning 20:21:28 skvidal, yeah the one item I found was that security list only showed EPEL security items.. do the EL5 repos not get that info/ 20:21:30 skvidal: when are we looking to start that process? 20:21:38 smooge: they should - I download it 20:21:52 CodeBlock: right after i finish futzing around with the nagios xmpp notification thing 20:22:00 * nirik also notes that with epel6 still in beta, there's no security/bugfix/enhancement info there. 20:22:06 which probably translates into "I'll work on the low-hanging fruit soon" 20:22:20 nirik: for the rhel6 boxes I'm likely to just apply all updates 20:22:24 yeah. 20:22:36 skvidal, will double check after meeting 20:22:41 ok 20:22:41 * nirik would be happy to help if needed, but not sure how much time he can commit to it. 20:22:53 skvidal, I still need to do a yum-compare 20:23:08 skvidal: well i'm happy to help, but I'll be off and on next week (finals week)...but yeah 20:23:09 since most of the EL6 boxes are beta boxes upgraded to EL6 or such 20:23:15 nod 20:23:24 CodeBlock, finals first then fun :) 20:23:39 smooge: :( 20:24:24 just don't do what I did my freshman finals which was vodka shots per physics question 20:24:52 ok skvidal so we can start next week on Monday? 20:25:05 smooge: naw, won't do that. Will just be on little sleep, and helping here, and doing some other projects, etc 20:25:20 #topic Rebuilding RHEL6 systems 20:25:28 but yes, finals come firsrt. *shuts up now* 20:25:49 This ties into updates and such. Most of the EL6 boxes are EL6beta upgraded 20:26:09 I have been trying to install various pt El6 boxes today and having 0 luck 20:26:55 so I am not sure where this stands at the moment 20:28:27 anyone who wants to see me have a temper tantrum after the meeting can watch in #fedora-noc 20:28:41 #topic Moving .devel and .stg systems to dedicated hardware. 20:29:08 ok so one of mmcgrath's last wishes before he passed onto the great cloud in the sky was to move all the PT boxs to ibiblio 20:29:44 I am almost done with it if I can play some musical chairs. 20:30:11 currently ibiblio has publictest3 and osuosl1 has a couple of staging and .dev boxes. 20:30:38 I am going to move one of the .dev boxes to ibiblio (when I can get EL6 building on a xen server) and that should fix that. 20:31:04 [again see temper tantrum after meeting] 20:31:12 xD 20:31:12 #topic Moving to newer bacula 20:31:32 Ok we are currently using two different methods to do backups here 20:32:01 1) Bacula from EL5 to a tape deck and 2) rsync scripts of certain items to an encrypted set of drives. 20:33:11 The bacula is very old and no longer supported upstream. The idea was to move to the one with EL6 BUT it is a Major undertaking... as we have terabytes of backed up data and it isn't an easy conversion. 20:33:55 Again this is going to need a big project plan 20:34:20 there have been some volunteers on the list. anyone here? 20:34:40 * ke4qqq is willing to help with this 20:34:58 thanks. are you going to fudcon? 20:35:01 * ke4qqq is about to do a similiar move to bacula 5.x 20:35:03 smooge: yes 20:35:45 I think it would be a good time to lay down the plans and what will be needed. Do I need to look at getting new hardware or dump everything to a petabyte disk etc etc :) 20:36:59 I think karanip will be there so he would be a resource to lean on (buy expensive case of cigarettes as bribes) 20:38:02 #action ke4qqq and others will lok at bacula upgrade at FUDcon 20:38:43 #topic Mirror systems moving to Fedora hardware 20:38:53 Ok this is going to be my beast for the next month 20:39:15 we have new hardware in PHX2 and soon at RDU to be the frontends for Fedora mirrors. 20:39:31 mdomsch, you around? 20:39:56 barely :-) 20:40:02 yeah, i saw that on th elist 20:40:04 how can I help? 20:40:57 well it will be mostly communication and making changes to mirrormanager I would guess. I am going to reach out to warthog9 on ideas also 20:41:22 basically we will have 4 hosts in PHX2 and 2 in RDU for I2 and Gigapop 20:41:25 MM changes should be minor if at all 20:41:42 they will have new ips I am going to get RSN(TM). 20:43:12 and then it would be pointing out to the mirrors that we have moved locations and hostnames for top tier rsyncs 20:43:22 can we move the hostname too? 20:43:40 I don't even know the current hostnames 20:43:44 download*.fedora.redhat.com i suppose 20:43:49 and rhm*.redhat.com ? 20:44:14 minimize pain for the syncers if we can keep using the same names 20:44:38 the hostnames will move as it will go from redhat.com -> fedoraproject.org 20:44:41 we have a pile of mirrors who aren't active participants on lists etc, but things continue to work, so they don't have to be too active 20:44:50 can redhat.com give us a CNAME ? 20:45:31 not sure.. I will ask 20:45:57 if so that's a good idea. principle of least suprise 20:47:22 smooge: can we also get an estimate of how much bandwidth is OK for those servers to provide? 20:47:39 so we can watch them, and add or restrict people to match? 20:48:09 I will do so. 20:48:34 gigapop? where's that? 20:49:23 oh, you have a gigapop connection in RDU. Nice. 20:49:48 oh sorry I was thinking of the network that replaces I2. NCSU has either gigapop or some similar thing 20:50:21 NLR 20:50:35 Lambda rail thanks 20:50:38 * Elwell apologises for tardiness 20:51:04 np 20:53:13 mdomsch, we won't be getting a cname for rhm.redhat.com as it will still be there to mirror RH stuff . 20:53:28 ugh 20:53:35 will they continue to carry fedora content on it? 20:53:39 e.g. they pull from us? 20:53:48 and continue to serve it? 20:54:05 we can ask people to switch, but I hate just cutting them off if they're not watching the lists... 20:55:24 no it will be for RHEL src.rpms and jboss stuff 20:55:40 bugger 20:56:24 basically they will stop mounting the Fedora netapp and we will start mounting that netapp 20:57:12 ok 20:57:49 so I guess we will need to start announcing to the mirror list and all that 20:59:26 alright I think I have killed this meeting 20:59:34 #topic open floor 20:59:43 anyone have anything.. anyone.. bueller? 20:59:52 nein 21:00:03 umm 21:00:05 * abadger1999 had a meeting ticket 21:00:15 let abadger1999 go first 21:00:22 mine is not important 21:00:34 https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/ticket/2481 21:00:38 * rbergeron hates to bump in but cloud meeting is starting in like .... imminent fashion ;) 21:00:49 * rbergeron looks to see if any other cloud folks are poking and and they aren't yet so go ahead 21:01:16 We can continue on #fedora-admin? 21:01:19 smooge: ? 21:01:30 * rbergeron starts to wonder if she should move out the cloud mtg a bit so she's not interrupting y'alls flow every week 21:01:35 ok will close off and continue in #fedora-admin 21:01:45 #endmeeting