05:06:39 #startmeeting i18n 05:06:39 Meeting started Thu Feb 10 05:06:39 2011 UTC. The chair is tagoh. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 05:06:39 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #halp #info #idea #link #topic. 05:06:43 #meetingname i18n 05:06:43 The meeting name has been set to 'i18n' 05:06:51 hi 05:07:04 #topic agenda and role call 05:07:16 https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/I18N/Meetings/2011-02-10 05:07:28 hi 05:07:36 hi, it's time for i18n meeting. who else here today? 05:07:57 hi 05:08:18 please update wiki if you have any agendas before we start. 05:08:20 hi 05:08:57 doh, s/role/roll/ 05:09:24 let's get started. 05:09:32 #topic F15 05:09:44 hi 05:10:11 FYI, next Tuesday is a deadline for alpha. 05:11:02 if you have any changes want to push for alpha, don't miss it. 05:11:10 * juhp wonders if branching started yet? 05:11:24 not yet 05:11:27 juhp: should be happened once mass-rebuild done. 05:11:34 yeah 05:11:37 ok 05:13:25 fwiw the feature freeze passed away. any bug fixes or feature complete for approved features are only allowed now. 05:13:29 fujiwarat: any news on gnome-shell and ibus? :) 05:14:00 juhp: Yes, we have some discussions on chat and bug: 05:14:01 https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=641531 05:14:12 .bug 657165 05:14:13 paragan, pravins: any updates on your features? 05:14:14 juhp: Bug 657165 [gnome3] ibus applet appearing in bottom popup notification area not panel - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=657165 05:14:44 tagoh, pravins has built all the Lohit series fonts with addition of Rupee symbol glyph 05:14:53 great 05:14:59 We still need to discuss some points. 05:14:59 tagoh: not, naveen is looking to improve performance of ibus-table 05:15:00 so RupeeSign feature is almost complete to 100% 05:15:15 paragan: cool 05:15:37 juhp: Probably I think gnome-shell is not default? 05:16:05 pravins: so not likely to see some efforts on alpha perhaps? 05:16:07 fujiwarat: I think it is if you have 3d - hence why the above bug is a blocker 05:16:17 fujiwarat: ok 05:16:46 so guess we won't have working ibus on gnome-shell for alpha 05:16:59 but as long as it is for beta should be ok I suppose 05:16:59 tagoh: yes 05:17:44 https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/I18N/InputMethods#GNOME-Shell 05:18:56 tagoh: did the other gnome-shell blocker get fixed? 05:19:33 juhp: I thought aalam closed a gnome-shell bug complaining about input through ibus? 05:20:03 fujiwarat: nice screenshots :-) 05:20:19 tagoh: so fixed? 05:20:22 Yes, that issue was fixed recently. 05:20:27 ah ok 05:20:42 .bug 669481 05:20:44 tagoh: Bug 669481 Cannot type anything into gnome-shell widgets - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=669481 05:20:45 bit hard testing rawhide recently 05:21:22 juhp: I didn't have a chance to get gnome-shell working here yet.. need a bare-metal box to play with. 05:21:28 tagoh: thanks 05:21:43 yeah 05:21:56 I use a live image to do that 05:22:05 aha 05:22:19 FYI: It's a workaround to remove a atk plugin in case you see many segv in the recent rawhide. 05:22:29 ah 05:22:33 good to know 05:22:43 fujiwarat: aha. thanks for info 05:23:27 any concerns or updates for f15? 05:24:44 ok, move on then. 05:24:50 #topic Package Updates 05:25:09 hi 05:25:15 any updates needing some volunteers for testing? 05:25:20 nkumar: hi 05:26:44 ok, shall we move on? 05:26:53 #topic Input Method 05:27:31 (may be more testing of updates needed after f15 branches:) 05:28:05 just realized that the above wiki page needs to be updated for the place of gtk+'s immodule cache file for gtk3 05:28:29 but anyway 05:28:36 aha 05:28:37 juhp: yeah 05:28:37 good idea. 05:29:30 any updates or information you want to share about IM? 05:29:34 I discussed GJS part with ibus upstream. Probably we will create a new package for ibus gjs in f16? 05:29:48 aha 05:30:09 fujiwarat: your screenshots look nice 05:30:12 does that mean they won't merge particular effort for ibus? 05:30:16 fujiwarat: so it will be separate? 05:30:34 guess not everyone needs gnome-shell support 05:31:00 Yes, the gjs part. Mainly he'd like to save his review time :). 05:31:57 fujiwarat: will it be hard to keep in sync with ibus? 05:32:21 * tagoh wonders if same problem happens with other IM 05:32:54 good point - i suppose none of them will support gnome-shell yet, hmmm 05:33:31 fujiwarat: so the support going into gnome-shell is ibus specific? 05:33:40 Hmm.., I'm not sure. But gjs errors won't be detected in build time likes python. 05:34:09 aha 05:34:51 good to have some testing on alpha maybe. 05:35:05 I mean the gjs files only to be separated: 05:35:09 https://github.com/fujiwarat/ibus/tree/gjs/ui/gjs 05:37:16 ok right 05:37:30 so we just see non-integrated UI if we don't have them? 05:37:38 fujiwarat: how about integrating it to rawhide? 05:37:57 tagoh: Yes 05:37:57 in ibus? 05:38:06 fujiwarat: ok, I see 05:38:18 juhp: I'm thinking to patch ibus for the current rawhide. 05:38:27 good 05:38:37 fujiwarat: this week? :) 05:38:52 It would be flexible maintenances vs package reviews. 05:38:54 we probably need to change comps too 05:39:13 fujiwarat: sure - I think it is ok to add ibus-gnome3 subpackage say for now 05:39:20 or ibus-gjs 05:39:30 juhp: OK, I will integrate it today. 05:39:40 maybe keep the say name you want to package separately later 05:39:41 cool! 05:39:47 s/say/same 05:39:57 ok, anything else? 05:40:00 juhp: Ah, probably subpackage is a great idea. 05:40:11 nkumar: any updates for ibus-table? 05:40:11 fujiwarat: for now it is ok 05:40:25 ic 05:41:10 fujiwarat: the screenshots look great anyway :) 05:41:30 juhp: thx. 05:42:45 code walkthrough for ibus-table... 05:43:11 ok 05:43:33 nkumar: any plans or milestone for alpha? 05:43:49 There is a discussion if we integrate ibus and keyboard separately or should merge the GUI at first. I'll continue to discuss it. 05:44:08 fujiwarat: aha 05:44:16 I mean I'll do on upstream. 05:44:20 :) 05:44:27 on bugzilla? 05:44:33 Yes 05:45:06 fujiwarat: aha - that sounds important 05:45:42 fujiwarat: so actually we need the gnome-shell changes too right - for ibus to work in f15? 05:46:46 Yes, current my suggestion is to just add ibus: 05:46:48 http://bugzilla-attachments.gnome.org/attachment.cgi?id=180446 05:47:10 https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=641531#c5 05:47:30 tagoh: looking for something till feb end...so alpha will miss 05:48:14 nkumar: ok 05:49:22 ok, anything else before moving? 05:50:23 shall we move on? 05:51:06 #topic Fonts and Rendering 05:51:29 pravins: thanks for updating lohit packages. 05:51:58 tagoh: no props :) 05:52:40 there are still a lot of bugs around fonts and rendering though. 05:52:49 aha 05:54:02 tagoh: hmm, some are RFE against Liberation and Lohit 05:55:21 need some resources to work on them 05:57:00 any concerns or something you want to bring up here for fonts and rendering? 05:57:19 hmm might be good to do a round of triaging again? 05:58:06 now as we move into the beta phase should focus a bit more on bugs I guess 05:58:33 juhp: maybe - though I tried a bit earlier but as pravins said some bugs is requesting add some glyphs for them 05:58:50 right 05:59:10 maybe we should move them to trac :) 05:59:27 hmm 05:59:40 aha. do we have a separate bug tracking system for Liberation and Lohit? 05:59:42 or wontfix? 06:00:03 but it is just hiding them under the carpet perhaps 06:00:20 right 06:00:37 tagoh: yeah I think both have trac 06:00:46 but little used perhaps 06:01:10 dunno if it really does help 06:01:52 pravins: might be good to compare Liberation and croscorefonts later 06:02:05 anyway 06:02:13 juhp: hmm 06:02:22 juhp: for f16 perhaps yeah 06:02:46 #topic Other 06:02:50 yeah - or just package croscorefonts :) 06:03:10 anything else we're missing? 06:03:38 bicon feedback: http://desktopi18n.wordpress.com/2011/01/31/bicon/#comments 06:04:29 I heard there are plans to move tx to tx.net btw, since infrastructure resources insufficient to maintain fedora tx 06:04:49 just thought I would mention that here fyi 06:04:59 juhp: right 06:05:20 fujiwarat: aha. good to hear that 06:05:31 It may be good to modify comps file for ar. 06:06:30 fujiwarat: yeah 06:06:45 maybe - also good to call for some volunteers to polish it 06:06:52 hm should it be default for Arabic or conditional perhaps? 06:07:37 if it is ready for general use 06:07:41 I'm not sure. conditional maybe ok. 06:07:46 yeah 06:07:51 hm, may be a good idea to get some feedbacks and bug fixes perhaps 06:08:01 yeah 06:08:31 that could be a good feature for Arabic but too late now though. 06:09:31 anyway, anything else? otherwise let's close the meeting shortly 06:10:42 fujiwarat: so maybe optional for f15 if you like 06:12:35 ok, thanks everyone for the meeting! 06:12:41 #endmeeting