15:03:58 #startmeeting kde-sig -- http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIGs/KDE/Meetings/2011-04-05 15:03:58 Meeting started Tue Apr 5 15:03:58 2011 UTC. The chair is jreznik. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 15:03:58 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #halp #info #idea #link #topic. 15:04:16 #meetingname kde-sig 15:04:16 The meeting name has been set to 'kde-sig' 15:04:26 #topic roll call 15:04:33 Present. 15:04:35 * rnovacek here 15:04:38 who's present today? 15:04:43 * ltinkl here 15:05:22 * than present 15:05:55 #topic agenda 15:06:11 meeting page does not exists yet - creating 15:10:31 page created 15:10:37 one topic - kbluetooth in F14 15:11:55 Maybe also the other regressions (Akonadi, kdepim offline mode), but I'm not sure we have much to discuss for those. 15:12:03 4.6.2 should also be a topic. 15:12:24 Kevin_Kofler: added 15:14:10 anything else? 15:15:12 ok, let's start - we can add it later 15:15:31 #topic kbluetooth + f14 15:16:05 it's going to be quick - rebuild is not enough - solid/control/bluetoothinterface.h is missing 15:16:24 so we have to go with bluedevil - it's a big change but 4.6 is either 15:16:47 current libbluedevil is in updates-testing 15:16:51 (for F14) 15:17:20 We'd have to readd that solid-bluetooth code from 4.5 if we want to stick with KBluetooth. 15:17:24 I'm for going with BlueDevil. 15:17:43 yup, go with BD 15:17:49 yes, +1 for bluedevil 15:18:02 yes, or we can readd the code for kbt 15:18:30 but I'm not sure it's worth doing it - I'd say no for F14 and 4.5 but with 4.6 update... 15:18:34 jreznik: it's not worth readding the code 15:18:59 we just replace kbl by bluedevil 15:19:13 BD is in a good shape (using it with F14, yesterday I found one very annoying bug, I have to report it) 15:19:29 so I'm +1 15:20:11 jreznik: is the bluedevil in f14 update testing ? 15:21:21 than: no, only libbluedevil 15:21:40 (it was easier for rdieter to build bluedevil for kde-redhat f14) 15:23:57 we didn't build it for F14 because it obsoletes kbluetooth 15:24:37 looks like it's clear to go with BD for F14 15:24:54 jreznik: i think we should build it in koji for f14 15:25:23 and push it into update-testing 15:25:26 #info kbluetooth is broken in F14 KDE 4.6.1 update due to missing Solid::Control Bluetooth Interface 15:25:37 than: it should be bundled in 4.6.1 update 15:26:02 #agreed KDE-SIG agreed to replace KBluetooth by BlueDevil 15:26:14 It's too late to add it to the 4.6.1 update because the 4.6.1 update is already stable. 15:26:23 We need to push it separately, ASAP because kbluetooth is broken now. 15:26:26 Kevin_Kofler: ops, sorry 15:26:54 yes, it should be separately 15:26:56 * jreznik has broken internal timer... 15:27:00 We should build it ASAP, separately from 4.6.2, so it can go out first. 15:27:09 indeed 15:27:09 Kevin_Kofler: +1 15:27:29 #info Latest libbluedevil already in updates-testing 15:28:13 #action jreznik to build bluedevil for F14 ASAP a push it separately from 4.6.2 as 4.6.1 is already in -stable 15:28:31 So do we have any info for the Akonadi/PIM-related regressions? 15:28:52 Akonadi hanging for some folks really sucks, but we don't have sufficient info to fix it. :-( 15:29:00 #topic Akonadi/PIM-related regressions 15:29:24 And this "offline is not offline" bug that got filed today is weird. 15:29:30 kdepim did not change, only kdepimlibs. 15:30:01 do we have bugzilla number for this issue? 15:30:20 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=693637 15:32:55 i will try to reproduce this bug later 15:33:34 we have to report it to kde bugzilla 15:34:24 it works for sending mails 15:34:27 Yes, it needs to be reported upstream. 15:34:53 waiting for periodic check 15:36:14 i will report it to KDE upstream 15:37:25 I'm not sure I can reproduce it - I set check every 1 minute, went offline and I see no checks at all 15:38:26 the akonadi fix is here: http://commits.kde.org/kdepim/cfa404b7188e4c26bddbc9579728f6d25f8cd214 15:38:34 committed today into kdepim/4.4 branch 15:38:47 let's skip it now - we can talk about it later (after someone really reproduce it) 15:39:25 ltinkl: Good news, can we build a kdepim update with this? 15:39:31 yup 15:39:50 ltinkl: can you please take care of it? 15:39:54 #info "offline not offline" bug regression in 4.6.1 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=693637 15:39:56 it was even discussed on kde-core-devel, Stephen Kelly advised distros to checrrypick that commit 15:40:07 #info ltinkl found commit to fix Akonadi issues 15:40:32 * ltinkl finds the kde.core.devel ML entry 15:40:50 http://lists.kde.org/?l=kde-core-devel&m=130200635713834&w=2 15:41:01 details there ^^ 15:41:12 Yeah, please build for F14 and F15 ASAP and try to get this out ASAP. 15:41:24 I will take care of that 15:41:30 ltinkl: thanks 15:41:39 Great, thanks! 15:42:46 #action ltinkl to take care about the Akanadi issues ASAP for both F14 & F15 15:42:51 For the "offline is not offline" issue, I guess we don't have enough info to discuss this yet. 15:43:05 Kevin_Kofler: yep, let's skip it - but I can't reproduce it 15:43:12 (now) 15:43:17 #topic 4.6.2 15:45:51 4.6.2 has been prereleased to packagers. 15:45:56 We should start working on packaging it. 15:46:19 i will take care of the 4.6.2 for f16 15:46:21 any taker? 15:46:30 than: I can help you tmrw 15:46:41 jreznik: great, thanks 15:46:49 Once we got this built in Rawhide, we need it built for F14 and F15 too. 15:46:50 * jreznik hopes not to be sick 15:47:06 Hopefully we'll be able to get it into F15 Final. 15:47:13 (It's too late for Beta.) 15:47:18 #info 4.6.2 has been prereleased to packagers 15:47:39 #action than and jreznik to work in rawhide update + f14 & f15 builds later 15:49:48 I think that's all for 4.6.2, next topic? 15:50:49 #topic https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=679486 15:51:17 .bug 679486 15:51:19 jreznik: Bug 679486 Unable to start graphical installer on RC1 KDE live image - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=679486 15:51:38 jlaska asked me to add it as meeting's topic 15:52:03 We have one user reporting that this is fixed because NM is no longer applying hostnames from DHCP, at least for him. 15:52:25 But this sounds weird, it might just be one bug masking the other there. 15:52:55 In any case, we need more confirmation if this is really fixed. 15:53:05 yeah, I'm not sure what the current status on this bug is 15:53:28 and it's has a long history as well, so I'd be happy if we could get some additional eyes on confirming whether it's fixed or not 15:54:23 jlaska: we will test it 15:55:08 than: thank you! I've added it to my queue as well, but I'm definitely not as in tune with the bug 15:57:04 Black text on panel looks not very good with black Lovelock wallpaper if desktop effects enabled http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/kde/2011-April/009195.html http://nucleo.fedorapeople.org/snapshot2.png but without effects looks fine http://nucleo.fedorapeople.org/snapshot1.png 15:57:06 Open discussion? 15:57:42 Kevin_Kofler: yeah, that's all I had on #topic. Thanks 15:57:56 #topic Open discussion 15:58:11 Hmmm, jreznik? 15:58:38 two minutes left... 15:59:05 * jreznik is looking 15:59:49 jreznik: np 16:00:42 it's not easy to find hw to test it :) 16:01:14 It should be testable with XRender compositing. 16:01:30 That normally works even on software rendering. 16:01:55 Kevin_Kofler: even with desktop effects on, my panel is not transparent and looks like snap1 16:02:12 I'll try to investigate it after meeting/tmrw 16:02:22 jreznik: KDE restarted after enabling effects? 16:02:36 it becames transparent after restart 16:03:03 nucleo: it flashed but that's all 16:03:06 #endmeeting