17:00:09 #startmeeting cwg -- http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Community_Working_Group 17:00:09 Meeting started Tue Apr 12 17:00:09 2011 UTC. The chair is nirik. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 17:00:09 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #halp #info #idea #link #topic. 17:00:21 #meetingname cwg 17:00:21 The meeting name has been set to 'cwg' 17:00:32 ping red_alert rbergeron nirik mjg59 17:00:38 #topic roll call 17:00:55 * red_alert is here :) 17:01:00 * jsmith lurks 17:01:12 * rbergeron is here 17:01:13 #chair red_alert rbergeron 17:01:13 Current chairs: nirik rbergeron red_alert 17:01:28 #info bpepple sends his regrets for the day 17:02:59 ok, I guess mjg59 is also unable to attend. 17:03:11 #topic CoC enforcement 17:03:24 So, anyone see things we need to change with the enforcement page still? 17:03:29 * nirik digs up a link 17:04:34 http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Community_working_group/CoC_Enforcement 17:05:04 #chair mjg59 17:05:04 Current chairs: mjg59 nirik rbergeron red_alert 17:05:15 Hey - sorry, been travelling for the past couple of weeks, and I'm still a touch lagged 17:05:29 hey mjg59. 17:05:40 just looking over the enforcement doc again 17:05:42 http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Community_working_group/CoC_Enforcement 17:07:04 I'd argue for s/try and/try to/ but maybe that's just an americanism that has different connotations in other english 17:08:01 * nirik doesn't care what colour that bikeshed is. 17:08:12 Otherwise I'm good with these as a starting point 17:08:16 I'm happy content-wise and I'll let the native speakers decide on grammer/language :) 17:08:52 * rbergeron grins 17:10:19 ok. 17:10:25 So, whats our next steps? 17:10:35 Where are we with the board? 17:10:39 do we want to do another round of feedback? or submit to the Board ? 17:10:56 Have we had a round of feedback on the enforcement guidelines? 17:11:07 (Sorry, really didn't manage to keep up while I was away!) 17:11:28 fab-list had a round of feedback for both the coc and its enforcement 17:11:41 yeah, we had a round on both... 17:12:21 Ah, yeah, I did read that 17:12:29 Ok, in that case I think we might as well og to the board 17:12:38 They can always ask for more feedback if they think we haven't covered it 17:13:09 cool. 17:13:22 So, would someone like to take on the task to submit stuff to the board for us/ 17:13:43 This week's not great for me 17:13:56 * rbergeron can take it over. 17:13:57 (really) 17:14:07 rbergeron: Works for me! 17:14:13 Are we just submitting it to board-list? Or actually filing a ticket 17:14:34 we might do both? 17:14:44 list for more feedback, ticket to make sure the board talks about it? 17:15:05 * rbergeron nods 17:15:11 sounds good. 17:15:40 What are we actually looking for? Feedback? or actual approval? 17:15:46 #action rbergeron to submit our drafts to the Board 17:15:59 approval I guess... unless they think we need more feedback/adjustment? 17:16:12 okay. 17:16:19 feedback for improvement if any, approval otherwise? 17:16:43 * rbergeron nods 17:17:01 Yup 17:17:11 cool. 17:17:16 #topic Other Business 17:17:25 Do we have any other business we want to address? 17:18:19 Well, we seem to be lacking any significant abuses so far 17:18:27 So I don't think there's much else for us to worry about yet 17:18:30 hopefully that will continue. ;) 17:18:52 * rbergeron knocks on a big piece of wood 17:19:34 ok, if nothing else, lets go ahead and call it a quick meeting. ;) 17:19:41 that was a quick meeting. 17:19:42 :) 17:19:47 yay :D 17:19:52 Hurrah! 17:21:17 #endmeeting