#fedora-meeting: Fedora QA Meeting
Meeting started by jlaska at 15:00:18 UTC
(full logs).
Meeting summary
- Roll Call (jlaska, 15:00:33)
- https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA/Meetings/20110516
(jlaska,
15:02:49)
- Previous meeting follow-up (jlaska, 15:02:56)
- tflink to follow-up with cloud sig for test day
recap (jlaska,
15:03:08)
- jlaska to follow-up w/ halfline on bug#702650,
kparal+jlaska to verify -- Appears to be tested and resolved, thanks
kparal and halfline! (jlaska,
15:04:37)
- adamw proposing patch for bug#697834 -- Done
... AcceptedNTH and available for walters if desired (jlaska,
15:04:48)
- jlaska - file proposed NTH bugs for F14->F15
-- Done ... with help from adamw, those affecting the media were
AcceptedNTH (jlaska,
15:05:07)
- F-15-Final-RC3 status (jlaska, 15:06:05)
- Just a reminder - the Go/No_Go meeting is
scheduled for tomorrow (Tuesday, May 17) (jlaska,
15:06:30)
- http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Go_No_Go_Meeting
(jlaska,
15:06:37)
- Thank you robatino for the RC3 announcement and
wiki management (jlaska,
15:08:51)
- https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Installation_Test
(jlaska,
15:09:41)
- https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Desktop_Test
(jlaska,
15:09:47)
- The QA retrospective page available for noting
the good/bad/ugly ...
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_15_QA_Retrospective
(jlaska,
15:11:52)
- https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Current_Release_Blockers
(jlaska,
15:13:00)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=704726 (jlaska, 15:14:09)
- upgrade from F-14 broken due to conflicts with
gnome-desktop (jlaska,
15:14:13)
- AGREED: 704726 -
tentatively agree to keep on list awaiting additional feedback from
reporter. If conditions hold, likely not a blocker since yum
upgrades are not the official upgrade mechanism (jlaska,
15:20:33)
- AGREED: 704727 -
tentatively agree to keep on list awaiting additional feedback from
reporter. If conditions hold, likely not a blocker since yum
upgrades are not the official upgrade mechanism (jlaska,
15:21:39)
- AGREED: 704728 -
tentatively agree to keep on list awaiting additional feedback from
reporter. If conditions hold, likely not a blocker since yum
upgrades are not the official upgrade mechanism (jlaska,
15:21:43)
- AGREED: 704729 -
tentatively agree to keep on list awaiting additional feedback from
reporter. If conditions hold, likely not a blocker since yum
upgrades are not the official upgrade mechanism (jlaska,
15:21:47)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=704188 (jlaska, 15:27:58)
- TypeError: 'NoneType' object is not
subscriptable (jlaska,
15:28:01)
- AGREED: 704188 -
AcceptedNTH - if anaconda is respun for F15, this fix will be
included (jlaska,
15:30:48)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=704020 (jlaska, 15:30:55)
- libpanel_applet changed ABI; not all applets
ported (jlaska,
15:30:59)
- AGREED: 704020 -
RejectedNTH - Suitable as a day-0 update to 'updates' repo, does not
inhibit anaconda-based upgrades (jlaska,
15:33:33)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=703944 (jlaska, 15:33:47)
- pfstools-octave has broken dependencies.
(jlaska,
15:33:52)
- AGREED: 703944 -
RejectedNTH - Suitable as a day-0 update to 'updates' repo, does not
inhibit anaconda-based upgrades and isn't referenced in comps
(jlaska,
15:35:00)
- Desktop validation testing still needed -
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Desktop_Test
(jlaska,
15:36:16)
- Some obsolete packages are included in F15 repo
... brunowolff suggested removing them before release (jlaska,
15:38:09)
- AutoQA update (jlaska, 15:39:02)
- kparal implemented package caching in AutoQA
(optional, default off). When enabled, it drastically speeds up
mainly depcheck runs. (kparal,
15:40:22)
- jskladan introduced an algorithm to filter
interesting information from depcheck log about why a particular
package has broken dependencies (kparal,
15:40:51)
- we started to nicely document our test cases.
First piece is upgradepath. (kparal,
15:43:02)
- https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/AutoQA_tests/Upgradepath
(kparal,
15:43:02)
- tflink worked on issue of yum getting stuck in
a loop that generated huge depcheck logs. When new yum builds land
in stable repos, we should be have that handled. (kparal,
15:43:44)
- vhumpa created a pretty text template for our
future test reports (kparal,
15:44:24)
- http://vhumpa.fedorapeople.org/prettylog_upgradepath_example2.txt
(kparal,
15:44:24)
- Upcoming QA events (jlaska, 15:49:51)
- http://rbergero.fedorapeople.org/schedules/f-15/f-15-quality-tasks.html
(jlaska,
15:50:10)
- Tuesday, May 17 - Go/NoGo meeting -
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Go_No_Go_Meeting (jlaska,
15:50:23)
- Tuesday, May 24 - Final (GA) release
(jlaska,
15:50:44)
- Open Discussion - <your topic
here> (jlaska,
15:51:05)
- pbrobinson talking to dgilmore about shifting
the SoaS release date to include some day-0 fixes (jlaska,
15:53:14)
Meeting ended at 15:55:20 UTC
(full logs).
Action items
- (none)
People present (lines said)
- jlaska (151)
- adamw (56)
- kparal (28)
- j_dulaney (21)
- brunowolff (16)
- tflink (14)
- vhumpa (12)
- pbrobinson (9)
- jsmith (5)
- Southern_Gentlem (4)
- zodbot (3)
- rbergeron (3)
- satellit_ (3)
- fenrus02 (1)
- elad661 (1)
- Viking-Ice (1)
- msavy (1)
Generated by MeetBot 0.1.4.