05:07:17 #startmeeting i18n 05:07:17 Meeting started Thu Aug 11 05:07:17 2011 UTC. The chair is tagoh. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 05:07:17 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #halp #info #idea #link #topic. 05:07:21 #meetingname i18n 05:07:21 The meeting name has been set to 'i18n' 05:07:40 #topic agenda and roll call 05:07:52 hi 05:07:58 https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/I18N/Meetings/2011-08-11 05:08:18 hi 05:08:30 hi, sorry for a bit late start. who else here today? 05:08:52 hello 05:09:13 hi 05:10:00 hello 05:10:00 if there are any topic you want to share please add it to the agenda or raise it at the end of meeting then. 05:10:09 okay, let's get started. 05:10:14 hi 05:10:17 #topic F16 05:11:11 as you may read an announce a few minutes ago, alpha is shipped one week. 05:12:12 yep - not entirely unexpected :) 05:12:28 one good news is that latest Live spin now boots :) 05:12:52 yep. alpha rc3 is available now. 05:13:03 and even has selinux working 05:13:11 tagoh: heh rc3 doesn't :) 05:13:48 maybe good to pick up from snapshot on alt.fp.o 05:14:21 anyway, any updates on features? 05:14:57 rc3 is latest on alt 05:15:01 anyway yes 05:16:14 I think probably https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/GnomeInputIntegration needs some more updating 05:16:51 I think rc4 will be released soon anyway 05:17:14 in the meantime there are newer nightly spins in koji 05:17:15 btw noriko-san from l10n team was asking if there are any further test on test day. they seem planning to have a half test day at 8/23 though. any concerns for anything on i18n? 05:18:29 fujiwarat, how much of GnomeInputIntegration is now in F16 btw? 05:19:01 the test day page for ibus feature is now open - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Day:2011-09-22_I18n_Desktop 05:19:16 we may need to polish that later though 05:19:20 juhp: now is GUADEC so the patch review is pending on upstream. 05:19:54 tagoh: cool 05:19:59 fujiwarat, ah yea 05:20:47 so anything for test day? 05:20:54 I see (strictly 85% should reflect what is in the tree...) 05:21:11 no need to test for indic say? 05:21:23 tagoh: hmm 05:21:38 or whatever 05:21:51 well, even if nothing, that's ok 05:22:28 tagoh: I got the impression from Noriko that l10n might be able to do some i18n (Fri) testing on the Tue 05:22:44 whereas doing two days would be too much for the team 05:23:32 I guess 23rd (l10n) will focus more on translations? 05:23:57 hm, yeah. so if we don't need further testing on non-planned area, we don't need to have it 05:24:05 juhp: right 05:24:55 this is just an opportunity to have more resources on i18n testing 05:25:18 so I thought it would be good if we had all the 26th testcases ready before 23rd 05:25:42 good point 05:25:44 yeah 05:25:45 for Asian translators 05:26:49 hi 05:27:36 testcases we are planning at 26th wouldn't be so much though, if we don't have anything else, we could simply have same test in 23rd perhaps 05:28:01 that would be one of idea. 05:28:13 tagoh: yep sounds good 05:29:01 so no particular candidates for testing? 05:30:54 will talk to noriko-san to have same testing for those who can't join at 23rd, to have more feedback on i18n then. 05:31:39 doc beat is now open. we may want to add some notes there. 05:32:07 candidates may be ibus feature and ITB and anything else? 05:33:29 ibus-rawcode 05:33:37 ? 05:33:58 aha 05:34:46 pravins, what about it? 05:35:01 please update the page as needed. we could discuss/polish it once it builds up. 05:35:08 yes please 05:35:22 I added a placeholder for the ibus feature 05:35:39 juhp: thanks 05:35:58 better if fujiwarat (and dueno) could kick off the initial text 05:36:58 okay 05:37:15 any concerns or topics on f16? 05:37:15 juhp: Are you talking about anything else instead of the test causes? 05:37:21 fujiwarat, https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Documentation_I18n_Beat 05:37:34 juhp: thx 05:38:19 fujiwarat, if you can put a sentence or two there say before before the next meeting that would be great :) 05:38:41 there may well be other ibus stuff to document too? for IMEs? 05:39:17 dueno, please mention ibus-gucharmap? 05:39:22 juhp: sorry, nothing about it 05:39:27 sure 05:39:33 great 05:39:40 yeah, maintainers, if there are anything better writing down in doc beat, good to add one. 05:40:09 any other new packages to mention? 05:40:31 pravins, maybe update ITB coverage? 05:40:55 juhp: yes, we have added Tamil also in that 05:41:07 ok 05:41:23 so let's have it ready in good time for the Alpha release 05:41:32 anyway, looking forward to see some notes there in next meeting :) 05:41:40 :) 05:41:41 juhp: yes, already packaged it for F16 05:41:51 pravins, the relnotes :) 05:42:09 tagoh: yesterday i packaged http://www.crulp.org/software/localization.htm fonts for Fedora 05:42:14 it = the docsbeat :) 05:42:24 it will increase Urdu font coverage in Fedora :) 05:42:30 cool 05:42:49 i will discuss with upstream regarding which font should be default for ur_IN and ur_PK 05:42:50 pravins, probably we can mentioned for Beta then 05:43:05 mention it 05:43:13 juhp: yeah may be, since this is in review stage presently 05:43:24 pravins: okay 05:43:39 better move on. 05:43:47 #topic Input Methods 05:43:59 any updates for IM? 05:46:09 nope? 05:47:55 hm, okay. move on then 05:48:06 #topic Fonts and Rendering 05:48:54 tagoh: nothing much 05:49:05 i am thinking to make upstream release of Lohit Telugu 05:49:24 lots of patched applied locally in Fedora only 05:49:27 pravins: wanted to ask a bit for new urdu fonts, as you said no decided for default font. so what's current status on priority etc? 05:50:04 pravins: aha 05:50:28 presently DroidSansArabic.ttf: "Droid Sans" "Regular" get selected for ur 05:51:13 but we really need comments from some Urdu person for selecting priority 05:52:03 i think http://www.crulp.org/software/localization.htm can provide some good inputs regarding that 05:52:20 hm, thought we don't have droid sans installed by default? 05:52:48 tagoh: they looks expert "Center for Research in Urdu Language Processing" 05:52:53 I should update the font list for f16 though 05:53:21 Just looking at the F16Blocker bugs - not quite sure if any of them really qualify - unfortunately or not I don't think the release criteria are so strict on l10n 05:53:26 tagoh: Yeah, will be good if we can take a look at it once again for F16 05:54:44 pravins, sure that is nice - but it would not be surprising if they recommend their own font - but sure let's hear what they say :-) 05:54:46 pravins: for f15 http://tagoh.fedorapeople.org/fonts/f15-defaultfonts.html - if unexpected result is there, we may need to revisit comps and fontconfig files etc 05:55:40 juhp: right. 05:55:54 yes 05:56:04 pravins, I wonder if comparing the fonts with some reference fonts would help 05:56:21 anyway we can always change the default later if necessary 05:56:52 juhp: from last experience on f15, criteria may be not that stricter than what it says. 05:56:52 juhp: from the website i am in impression that, they are using this font for wide purposes 05:57:29 juhp: but yeah, agree with you, we can test these against fonts release by Govt. of India 05:57:33 pravins, I am all for adding that font - just saying that it would not hurt to get another opinion too :) 05:57:42 sure 05:57:43 s/test/compare 05:58:07 tagoh; aha 05:58:46 epico_laptop: btw have you tested f16 for changing chinese fonts on anaconda? 06:00:05 .bug 709962 06:00:07 tagoh: Bug 709962 Please change the Chinese font in boot.iso from cjkuni-uming-fonts to wqy-microhei-fonts - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=709962 06:00:30 the bug status is MODIFIED. need to test that 06:02:12 okay, anything else? 06:02:37 tagoh: sorry, I will test it soon, thanks for informing me. 06:02:49 epico_laptop: thanks! 06:03:06 :) 06:03:27 anything before closing the meeting? 06:04:39 okay. better stop here then. thanks everyone for the meeting! 06:04:50 #endmeeting