13:00:34 #startmeeting Fedora Docs Project - Agenda https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Docs_Project_meetings 13:00:34 Meeting started Mon Aug 15 13:00:34 2011 UTC. The chair is zoglesby. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 13:00:34 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #halp #info #idea #link #topic. 13:00:57 #topic roll call 13:01:01 * bcotton 13:01:13 * zoglesby is here (I think) 13:01:19 I'm here 13:01:26 * eslobodo is here 13:01:30 * jjmcd 13:01:35 * fnadge too 13:02:20 no Sparks... 13:02:22 #topic Follow up on last week's action items 13:02:32 + rudi to continue to follow up on FOP issue 13:02:46 jjmcd: you said rudi had a fix for this? 13:02:55 Yes, a few weeks ago 13:03:13 or an interim solution 13:03:13 I don't recall, tho whether it was on fedorpeople or koji 13:03:33 okay, I will send an email to find out the status 13:03:36 Seems like it was a new version of FOP - still not in the repos as bes I can tell 13:04:15 #action zoglesby email rudi to find out status of FOP 13:05:03 Sparks so I will skip his items and get him to reply to the list 13:05:09 + jjmcd to write draft tech notes for beat writers 13:05:18 done, link on meeting page 13:05:41 #link http://jjmcd.fedorapeople.org/Download/F16_Technical_Notes/index.html 13:05:51 jjmcd: thanks, any issue come up with that? 13:05:58 No, interesting tho 13:06:12 that once again we have a huge number ofnew genomics apps 13:06:42 jjmcd: did you try to email the packager to find out if we wanted to work on a guide? 13:06:55 I don't remember what we said on that 13:07:09 no i didn't - didn't even identfy whether there was a single primary packager 13:07:20 ie if we wanted to email him, or bring it up at FUDCon 13:07:35 ah, okay 13:07:45 I may be thinking about something else 13:08:07 #topic Fedora 16 Schedule 13:08:13 Well, I know following up on the packager was something that occurred to me 13:08:28 #link http://tinyurl.com/F16-docs 13:08:40 * nathant sneaks in at the back 13:08:46 the only actual item this week is the Alpha notes 13:08:48 + Create Alpha Announcement (Marketing & Docs)Thu 2011-08-11 13:08:58 And good progress there 13:09:00 and I think that jjmcd has done most of the work on that 13:09:09 Several folks came out of the woodwork to work on them 13:09:17 * suehle follows nathant in the back door :) 13:09:29 I put up a skeleton, but rahul, I think nathant and others did a lot of work 13:09:52 #link http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_16_Alpha_release_notes 13:10:06 One thing rahul did I'm not 100% sure of 13:10:15 great, thanks to everyone that helped out with that 13:10:22 np! 13:10:35 He put most of the detail in the announcement and cleaned out the RNs to point tot he announcement. Not sure whether it shoudl be the other way around 13:11:10 But it doesn't look all that bad the way it is 13:11:28 If marketing is happy with it i'll let it go 13:11:36 Surely the alpha release notes are the alpha for the release notes as well as being release notes for the alpha? 13:11:46 By which I mean, they should be detailed? 13:11:47 nathant, not really 13:11:48 I will get with rbergeron or someone from marketing this week to give it a once over 13:11:56 oh ok 13:12:03 Beta is, but alpha rn's are wiki only, one page, pretty minimal 13:12:09 ok cool 13:12:37 A word t folks working on rn's 13:12:59 jjmcd: are we making progress on the release notes? I have not looked at the rn page to see if people are verifying there beats 13:13:12 The tech notes have all changes, so you can look at areas relevant to your beat, follow the upstream link, and get some insight there 13:13:31 zoglesby, some, more progress on the beats than removing the *s 13:13:50 * zoglesby needs to get started on my beats 13:14:20 Several writers started working on beat after i posted to dev 13:14:39 jjmcd: thats what I like to hear! 13:15:02 anyone have any schedule issue they want to bring up? 13:15:04 but we are very short on time this release 13:15:26 * jjmcd needs to beat on rbergeron to be sure we have a schedule review next release 13:15:42 jjmcd: I will make sure that happens 13:16:03 zoglesby, most RN work happens for beta 13:16:09 and that is very short this time 13:16:43 GA is minor updates and waiting for L10n 13:17:07 #topic FAD @ OLF 13:18:07 Sparks and I got an email back from the people at OLF and it looks like our internet connection will be free. They also offered lunch that day for 20 bucks a head, but I think that Sparks is going to address that on the list 13:18:32 that is the only news I have on OLF 13:18:54 jjmcd: do you have anything about either FUDCon? 13:19:03 No, not really 13:19:07 if not I am going to pass over that this week 13:19:10 okay 13:19:13 EMEA is getting close, too 13:19:22 We have some time for NA 13:19:35 we are also going to pass QA for the week 13:19:50 #topic Guide Status 13:20:12 * jjmcd just checked, rudi has a fop on koji 13:20:16 I saw an email about Gnome 3 for the Users Guide, anyone have any updates on this? 13:20:19 jjmcd: thanks! 13:20:26 and I think that is the one that works 13:20:28 zoglesby: yes 13:20:37 nathant: the floor is yours! 13:20:41 It's now been updated for GNOME 3 13:20:44 but 13:20:48 I need people to proofread 13:20:57 and fix my broken DocBook 13:21:00 woo-hoo!!! 13:21:05 and standardise my tags 13:21:13 Hi, am working on Gnome 3 and was wonmdering whether anybody else has done or is going to do anything on this chapter. Also, does anybody have any suggestions concenring : https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/F15_User_Guide_Gnome_3_Chapter 13:21:13 which are a bit all over the place 13:21:39 fnadge: it's all in the User Guide git repo 13:21:46 nathant: great, I will try and have a look ove the next few days 13:21:59 excellent 13:22:08 fnadge: feel free to add anything from your wiki to the repo if you think it fits 13:22:20 in particular, we need something about updating the system 13:22:30 Sure, sounds great, thanks 13:22:35 probably in the 'Managing Software' section 13:22:51 also 13:23:01 I understand that the guide currently has no maintainer 13:23:15 no one to branch it, publish drafts and translations etc 13:23:22 so we need to find someone to do that 13:23:26 any volunteers??? 13:23:27 Do we have a chapter for the new KDE plasma screen? 13:23:39 fnadge: I don't know about that 13:23:43 Sure, I can maintain that 13:23:55 my feeling is that we should get what is there up to date and correct 13:24:00 then add extra stuff later! 13:24:23 fnadge: ok, great! 13:24:24 nathant: you mean push what we have to docs.fp.o now? 13:24:31 is laubersm not maintaining the UG anymore? 13:24:56 nathant: well talked to some KDE people here and was told that they might need help with that 13:24:59 bcotton: the Guide Goals for F16 wiki page says that a new maintainer is needed 13:25:14 I think laubersm wrote that 13:25:19 so I'm guessing not! 13:25:22 nathant: i guess that answers that :-) 13:25:29 although if she wants to carry on doing it, then great 13:25:38 bcotton: are you working on the printing chapter? 13:26:02 bcotton: thanks for brining that up 13:26:21 We need to have people verify they are still willing to be guide owners 13:26:39 does anyone know if there's a wiki page for guide maintaining? 13:26:44 nathant: correct. i'll update it for f16 when i can get gnome3 working in virtual box :p 13:26:51 like a list of tasks it entails? 13:26:55 #action zoglesby email docs-list to have guide owners verify they are still working there guides 13:26:58 bcotton: great 13:27:20 bcotton: I left that chapter well alone because I knew you were working on it! 13:27:28 any other guide items? 13:27:41 guide maintenance wiki page? 13:27:53 re: how to maintain guides page, there's not one that i know of. but if someone experienced would like to start one, that'd be really useful to those of us who are newer 13:27:58 #link http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Docs_Project_meetings#Guides 13:28:03 bcotton: ^^ 13:28:18 oh, how to 13:28:36 yes, how to 13:28:40 By the way, I can remember you were looking into aq guide for astrophysics, we got two people here in Brno. Who is looking after that project at the moment? 13:28:40 zoglesby: yeah, nathant asked about it a few lines up 13:29:17 fnadge, gomix was heading that up 13:29:26 Will the Brno folks be at Milan? 13:29:37 jjmcd: thanks, will email him 13:29:43 jjmcd: would you be willing to work with me to create a guide owners howto page? 13:29:51 zoglesby, sure 13:30:12 jjmcd: nope, I don't think so 13:30:13 #action zoglesby and jjcmd to work on guide owners manual on wiki 13:30:18 zoglesby, jjmcd: that would be great 13:30:25 one more thing about guides 13:30:29 TRANSIFEX 13:30:30 fnadge, bothe gomix and I will be there 13:30:39 nathant, ack! 13:31:08 jjmcd: great, jhradilek, pkovar and me have already booked a flight 13:31:17 does anyone need help getting Transifex.net working with their guide or whatnot? 13:31:34 nathant, I have had zero success with release notes 13:31:38 There are some important changes happening this wekk 13:31:50 Mostly waiting for build system rather than burning more cycles 13:32:03 nathant: the issue I see is that most guide owners have yet to get it working 13:32:23 nb did a lot of work last release to get us going, but not much happend after that 13:33:11 ok, perhaps I should just take a look at the RNs and the guides 13:33:16 and see if I can set it up 13:33:23 I managed to do it for the Live Image Guide 13:33:32 nathant, the F15 RNs have several translations outstanding 13:33:38 nathant: if you have time that would be great 13:33:43 I notices LiveImage was the only thing translated 13:33:48 and the Transifex folks have some good documentation 13:34:05 I also need to spend some time with it, we did a bad job working with L10N last release and I would like to fix that 13:34:06 ok if I have time this week I will see what I can do 13:34:17 priorities? RNs? 13:34:31 nathant: yeah RN first 13:34:38 ok 13:34:46 nathant, I'm sure a lot of translators would be happy if you could publish their F15 translations 13:34:48 its the only item that changes 100% every release 13:35:01 jjmcd: ok, I'll try 13:35:19 I'm free this week, but then all hell breaks loose on Friday 13:35:24 any other items for guides? 13:35:35 and it'll be 2-3 weeks before I have any more time to work on stuff 13:35:45 nathant: i've some experience working with tx so i can help you out with that 13:35:59 pkovar: excellent, thank you! 13:36:20 #topic Open floor discussion 13:36:29 nathant: no problem, just ping me 13:36:35 Anything other comments, complaints, etc? 13:36:38 pkovar: ok 13:37:40 yes 13:37:51 jjmcd: go for it 13:37:51 any hints on how to get a review 13:38:07 I have a non-docs package wanting a review for a while now 13:38:15 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=722640 13:38:22 I saw someone trading reviews in another room last week :P 13:38:23 I'm pretty stale on the whole process 13:38:34 jjmcd: I will have a look at it today 13:38:42 Don't know if I'm qualified to review someone else's work 13:38:50 oh 13:39:00 review never mind 13:39:34 Yeah, and this one is kind of weird 13:39:39 It's an R plugin 13:40:18 jjmcd: I have no advice 13:41:10 I may have to ask spot for help 13:41:10 With that I will end the meeting, thanks everyone for showing up 13:41:16 thanks Zach 13:41:26 #endmeeting